Low-Value Care De-implementation: Practices for Systemwide Reduction

被引:4
|
作者
Sorenson, Corinna [1 ]
Japinga, Mark [2 ]
Crook, Hannah [3 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Duke Margolis Ctr Hlth Policy, Sanford Sch Publ Policy, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Duke Margolis Ctr Hlth Policy, Washington, DC USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Policy, Nashville, TN USA
来源
关键词
CULTURE;
D O I
10.1056/CAT.21.0387
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Despite a growing body of evidence documenting the problem of low-value care, our understanding of how to effectively reduce or eliminate it remains limited. Through semistructured interviews with U.S. health care organizations with demonstrated experience and success in low-value care reduction, the authors sought to elucidate how different stakeholders across the system approach low-value care de-implementation in practice and the key strategies and actions used. The analysis identified four key phases of low-value care de-implementation: (1) plan and assemble, (2) identify and assess, (3) de-implement, and (4) evaluate and disseminate. De-implementation is an iterative, multiphased, multicomponent process marked by ongoing learning and feedback loops. Each organization approached low-value care de-implementation with a strong orientation toward experimentation and continuous improvement and as a central tenet of a broader organizational mission to improve health and health care value. To combat the complex drivers that facilitate and sustain low-value care provision, organizations adopted a range of strategies, resources, and tools to inform, implement, and drive their de-implementation efforts. Such features included, but were not limited to, senior leadership support and aligning low-value care initiatives with unifying organizational values and priorities; physician leadership and empowerment; de-implementation infrastructure supports across people, data, and technology; education and engagement opportunities for providers, patients, and staff; data-driven techniques to measure and track low-value care, benchmark performance, and embed or link de-implementation targets within payment, network design, and care pathways; and ongoing relations with internal teams and external stakeholders and partners to disseminate and scale de-implementation best practices. While health care organizations are complex and unique - with their own culture, workforce mix, resources, and priorities - these identified experiences and practices from organizations successful in de-implementation can inform and empower others across the health care landscape to act, innovate, and move the needle on systemwide low-value care reduction.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reducing Low-Value Practices a Functional-Contextual Consideration to Aid in De-Implementation Efforts
    Farmer, Ryan L.
    Zaheer, Imad
    Duhon, Gary J.
    Ghazal, Stephanie
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 36 (02) : 153 - 165
  • [22] Low-value health care, de-implementation, and implications for nursing research: A discussion paper
    Beks, H.
    Clayden, S.
    Wong Shee, Anna
    Manias, E.
    Versace, V. L.
    Beauchamp, A.
    Mc Namara, K. P.
    Alston, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2024, 156
  • [23] Unpacking low-value castration practices using behavior specification to guide de-implementation in prostate cancer care.
    Skolarus, Ted A.
    Forman, Jane
    Sparks, Jordan B.
    Metreger, Tabitha
    Hawley, Sarah T.
    Caram, Megan Veresh
    Dossett, Lesly Ann
    Larkin, Angela
    Cruz, Alan Paniagua
    Makarov, Danil V.
    Leppert, John T.
    Shelton, Jeremy B.
    Stensland, Kristian D.
    Hollenbeck, Brent K.
    Shahinian, Vahakn
    Wittmann, Daniela A.
    Deolankar, Varad
    Sriram, S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (16) : E17055 - E17055
  • [24] Specifying behavioural and strategy components of de-implementation efforts targeting low-value prescribing practices in secondary health care
    Dunsmore, Jennifer
    Duncan, Eilidh
    Maclennan, Sara
    N'Dow, James
    Maclennan, Steven
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 5 (01):
  • [25] Perspectives on low-value care and barriers to de-implementation among primary care physicians: a multinational survey
    Raudasoja, Aleksi
    Tikkinen, Kari A. O.
    Bellini, Benedetta
    Ben-Sheleg, Eliana
    Ellen, Moriah E.
    Francesconi, Paolo
    Hussien, Muaad
    Kaji, Yuki
    Karlafti, Eleni
    Koizumi, Shunzo
    Ouahrani, Emir
    Paier-Abuzahra, Muna
    Savopoulos, Christos
    Spary-Kainz, Ulrike
    Komulainen, Jorma
    Sipila, Raija
    BMC PRIMARY CARE, 2024, 25 (01):
  • [26] De-implementation of low value clinical practices is essential for critical care nurses
    Tume, Lyvonne N.
    Aitken, Leanne M.
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2024, 29 (02) : 244 - 245
  • [27] Strategic de-implementation: strengthening patient safety by eliminating low value care practices
    Glarcher, Manela
    Ferguson, Caleb
    Patch, Michelle
    Steven, Alison
    Vaismoradi, Mojtaba
    CONTEMPORARY NURSE, 2024, 60 (03) : 223 - 227
  • [28] De-implementation of care practices and interventions
    Resnick, Barbara
    GERIATRIC NURSING, 2018, 39 (04) : 369 - 370
  • [29] COMMENTARY: DE-IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE: A VIRTUOUS CYCLE OF CEASING AND DESISTING LOW-VALUE CARE BEFORE IMPLEMENTING NEW HIGH VALUE CARE
    Davidson, Karina W.
    Ye, Siqin
    Mensah, George A.
    ETHNICITY & DISEASE, 2017, 27 (04) : 463 - 468
  • [30] Does de-implementation of low-value care impact the patient-clinician relationship? A mixed methods study
    Rockwell, Michelle S.
    Michaels, Kenan C.
    Epling, John W.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)