Low-Value Care De-implementation: Practices for Systemwide Reduction

被引:4
|
作者
Sorenson, Corinna [1 ]
Japinga, Mark [2 ]
Crook, Hannah [3 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Duke Margolis Ctr Hlth Policy, Sanford Sch Publ Policy, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Duke Margolis Ctr Hlth Policy, Washington, DC USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Policy, Nashville, TN USA
来源
关键词
CULTURE;
D O I
10.1056/CAT.21.0387
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Despite a growing body of evidence documenting the problem of low-value care, our understanding of how to effectively reduce or eliminate it remains limited. Through semistructured interviews with U.S. health care organizations with demonstrated experience and success in low-value care reduction, the authors sought to elucidate how different stakeholders across the system approach low-value care de-implementation in practice and the key strategies and actions used. The analysis identified four key phases of low-value care de-implementation: (1) plan and assemble, (2) identify and assess, (3) de-implement, and (4) evaluate and disseminate. De-implementation is an iterative, multiphased, multicomponent process marked by ongoing learning and feedback loops. Each organization approached low-value care de-implementation with a strong orientation toward experimentation and continuous improvement and as a central tenet of a broader organizational mission to improve health and health care value. To combat the complex drivers that facilitate and sustain low-value care provision, organizations adopted a range of strategies, resources, and tools to inform, implement, and drive their de-implementation efforts. Such features included, but were not limited to, senior leadership support and aligning low-value care initiatives with unifying organizational values and priorities; physician leadership and empowerment; de-implementation infrastructure supports across people, data, and technology; education and engagement opportunities for providers, patients, and staff; data-driven techniques to measure and track low-value care, benchmark performance, and embed or link de-implementation targets within payment, network design, and care pathways; and ongoing relations with internal teams and external stakeholders and partners to disseminate and scale de-implementation best practices. While health care organizations are complex and unique - with their own culture, workforce mix, resources, and priorities - these identified experiences and practices from organizations successful in de-implementation can inform and empower others across the health care landscape to act, innovate, and move the needle on systemwide low-value care reduction.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Identification and de-implementation of low-value emergency care
    Gangathimmaiah, Vinay
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2025, 37 (02)
  • [2] De-implementation of Low-Value Practices for Autism Spectrum Disorder
    Friedman, Nicole R.
    Watkins, Laci
    Barnard-Brak, Lucy
    Barber, Angela
    White, Susan W.
    CLINICAL CHILD AND FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2023, 26 (03) : 690 - 705
  • [3] De-implementation of Low-Value Practices for Autism Spectrum Disorder
    Nicole R. Friedman
    Laci Watkins
    Lucy Barnard-Brak
    Angela Barber
    Susan W. White
    Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2023, 26 : 690 - 705
  • [4] Methodological progress note: De-implementation of low-value care
    Kripalani, Sunil
    Norton, Wynne E.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2024, 19 (01) : 57 - 61
  • [5] Strategies for de-implementation of low-value care—a scoping review
    Sara Ingvarsson
    Henna Hasson
    Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz
    Per Nilsen
    Byron J. Powell
    Clara Lindberg
    Hanna Augustsson
    Implementation Science, 17
  • [6] Informing de-implementation of low-value breast and prostate cancer practices
    Skolarus, Ted
    Wittmann, Daniela
    Forman, Jane
    Sparks, Jordan
    Metreger, Tabitha
    Sales, Anne
    Paniagua-Cruz, Alan
    Stensland, Kristian
    Hawley, Sarah
    Wang, Ton
    Baskin, Alison
    Mott, Nicole
    Dossett, Lesly
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2021, 16 (SUPPL 1):
  • [7] Strategies for de-implementation of low-value care-a scoping review
    Ingvarsson, Sara
    Hasson, Henna
    von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
    Nilsen, Per
    Powell, Byron J.
    Lindberg, Clara
    Augustsson, Hanna
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [8] Towards De-Implementation of low-value thyroid care in older adults
    Perkins, Jennifer M.
    Papaleontiou, Maria
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENDOCRINOLOGY DIABETES AND OBESITY, 2022, 29 (05) : 483 - 491
  • [9] Effectiveness of de-implementation of low-value healthcare practices: an overview of systematic reviews
    Kien, Christina
    Daxenbichler, Julia
    Titscher, Viktoria
    Baenziger, Julia
    Klingenstein, Pauline
    Naef, Rahel
    Klerings, Irma
    Clack, Lauren
    Fila, Julian
    Sommer, Isolde
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [10] Identifying embedded, low-value nutrition care practices for de-implementation - a nominal group technique approach
    Rushton, Alita
    Elmas, Kai
    Bell, Jack
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2020, 15 (SUPPL 4):