Machine learning for the diagnosis accuracy of bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Pan, Yi [1 ]
Wang, Pushi [2 ]
Xue, Bowen [3 ,4 ]
Liu, Yanbin [2 ]
Shen, Xinhua [1 ]
Wang, Shiliang [1 ]
Wang, Xing [1 ]
机构
[1] Huzhou Univ, Huzhou Municipal Hosp 3, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Neurosis & Psychosomat Dis, Huzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] NCMHC, Natl Ctr Mental Hlth, Dept Mental Disorders, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Mental Hlth Ctr, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Univ, Hangzhou Peoples Hosp 7, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY | 2025年 / 15卷
关键词
depression; bipolar disorder; machine learning; predictive model; systematic review; DEPRESSION; UNIPOLAR; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1515549
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Diagnosing bipolar disorder poses a challenge in clinical practice and demands a substantial time investment. With the growing utilization of artificial intelligence in mental health, researchers are endeavoring to create AI-based diagnostic models. In this context, some researchers have sought to develop machine learning models for bipolar disorder diagnosis. Nevertheless, the accuracy of these diagnoses remains a subject of controversy. Consequently, we conducted this systematic review to comprehensively assess the diagnostic value of machine learning in the context of bipolar disorder. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science, with the search ending on April 1, 2023. QUADAS-2 was applied to assess the quality of the literature included. In addition, we employed a bivariate mixed-effects model for the meta-analysis. Results: 18 studies were included, covering 3152 participants, including 1858 cases of bipolar disorder. 28 machine learning models were encompassed. Sensitivity and specificity in discriminating between bipolar disorder and normal individuals were 0.88 (9.5% CI: 0.74 similar to 0.95) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.73 similar to 0.96) respectively, and the SROC curve was 0.94(95% CI: 0.92 similar to 0.96). The sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing between bipolar disorder and depression were 0.84 (95%CI: 0.80 similar to 0.87) and 0.82 (95%CI: 0.75 similar to 0.88) respectively. The SROC curve was 0.89 (95%CI: 0.86 similar to 0.91). Conclusions: Machine learning methods can be employed for discriminating and diagnosing bipolar disorder. However, in current research, they are predominantly utilized for binary classification tasks, limiting their progress in clinical practice. Therefore, in future studies, we anticipate the development of more multi-class classification tasks to enhance the clinical applicability of these methods.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Olanzapine plus fluoxetine for bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Silva, Marcus T.
    Zimmermann, Ivan R.
    Galvao, Tais F.
    Pereira, Mauricio G.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2013, 146 (03) : 310 - 318
  • [42] Prevalence of Bipolar Symptoms or Disorder in Epilepsy A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Li, Jimmy
    Ledoux-Hutchinson, Lawrence
    Toffa, Denahin Hinnoutondji
    NEUROLOGY, 2022, 98 (19) : E1913 - E1922
  • [43] Ecological momentary interventions for bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hirbod-Mobarakeh, Armin
    Keshavarz-Akhlaghi, Amir-Abbas
    Hadi, Fatemeh
    Eghdami, Shayan
    Hirbod-Mobarakeh, Arash
    Kalhori, Sara Hassan
    Khanipour-Kencha, Ali
    SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2025,
  • [44] The prevalence of bipolar disorder in autoimmune disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Mengyi
    Jiang, Qi
    Zhang, Lei
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (01) : 350 - 361
  • [45] Prepulse inhibition in patients with bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhen Mao
    Qijing Bo
    Weidi Li
    Zhimin Wang
    Xin Ma
    Chuanyue Wang
    BMC Psychiatry, 19
  • [46] A systematic review and meta-analysis of premature mortality in bipolar affective disorder
    Hayes, J. F.
    Miles, J.
    Walters, K.
    King, M.
    Osborn, D. P. J.
    ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2015, 131 (06) : 417 - 425
  • [47] Prevalence of bipolar disorder in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Joseph, Boney
    Nandakumar, Aiswarya L.
    Ahmed, Ahmed T.
    Gopal, Neethu
    Murad, M. Hassan
    Frye, Mark A.
    Tobin, W. Oliver
    Singh, Balwinder
    EVIDENCE-BASED MENTAL HEALTH, 2021, 24 (02) : 88 - 94
  • [48] Serum folate levels in bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hsieh, Yung-Chi
    Chou, Li-Shiu
    Lin, Ching-Hua
    Wu, Hung-Chi
    Li, Dian-Jeng
    Tseng, Ping-Tao
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [49] A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatments for rapid cycling bipolar disorder
    Strawbridge, Rebecca
    Kurana, Suman
    Kerr-Gaffney, Jess
    Jauhar, Sameer
    Kaufman, Kenneth R.
    Yalin, Nefize
    Young, Allan H.
    ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2022, 146 (04) : 290 - 311
  • [50] Substance abuse in patients with bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Messer, Thomas
    Lammers, Gero
    Mueller-Siecheneder, Florian
    Schmidt, Raluca-Florela
    Latifi, Sahar
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2017, 253 : 338 - 350