Machine learning for the diagnosis accuracy of bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Pan, Yi [1 ]
Wang, Pushi [2 ]
Xue, Bowen [3 ,4 ]
Liu, Yanbin [2 ]
Shen, Xinhua [1 ]
Wang, Shiliang [1 ]
Wang, Xing [1 ]
机构
[1] Huzhou Univ, Huzhou Municipal Hosp 3, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Neurosis & Psychosomat Dis, Huzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] NCMHC, Natl Ctr Mental Hlth, Dept Mental Disorders, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Mental Hlth Ctr, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Univ, Hangzhou Peoples Hosp 7, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY | 2025年 / 15卷
关键词
depression; bipolar disorder; machine learning; predictive model; systematic review; DEPRESSION; UNIPOLAR; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1515549
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Diagnosing bipolar disorder poses a challenge in clinical practice and demands a substantial time investment. With the growing utilization of artificial intelligence in mental health, researchers are endeavoring to create AI-based diagnostic models. In this context, some researchers have sought to develop machine learning models for bipolar disorder diagnosis. Nevertheless, the accuracy of these diagnoses remains a subject of controversy. Consequently, we conducted this systematic review to comprehensively assess the diagnostic value of machine learning in the context of bipolar disorder. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science, with the search ending on April 1, 2023. QUADAS-2 was applied to assess the quality of the literature included. In addition, we employed a bivariate mixed-effects model for the meta-analysis. Results: 18 studies were included, covering 3152 participants, including 1858 cases of bipolar disorder. 28 machine learning models were encompassed. Sensitivity and specificity in discriminating between bipolar disorder and normal individuals were 0.88 (9.5% CI: 0.74 similar to 0.95) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.73 similar to 0.96) respectively, and the SROC curve was 0.94(95% CI: 0.92 similar to 0.96). The sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing between bipolar disorder and depression were 0.84 (95%CI: 0.80 similar to 0.87) and 0.82 (95%CI: 0.75 similar to 0.88) respectively. The SROC curve was 0.89 (95%CI: 0.86 similar to 0.91). Conclusions: Machine learning methods can be employed for discriminating and diagnosing bipolar disorder. However, in current research, they are predominantly utilized for binary classification tasks, limiting their progress in clinical practice. Therefore, in future studies, we anticipate the development of more multi-class classification tasks to enhance the clinical applicability of these methods.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
    Fleuren, Lucas M.
    Klausch, Thomas L. T.
    Zwager, Charlotte L.
    Schoonmade, Linda J.
    Guo, Tingjie
    Roggeveen, Luca F.
    Swart, Eleonora L.
    Girbes, Armand R. J.
    Thoral, Patrick
    Ercole, Ari
    Hoogendoorn, Mark
    Elbers, Paul W. G.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 46 (03) : 383 - 400
  • [32] Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
    Lucas M. Fleuren
    Thomas L. T. Klausch
    Charlotte L. Zwager
    Linda J. Schoonmade
    Tingjie Guo
    Luca F. Roggeveen
    Eleonora L. Swart
    Armand R. J. Girbes
    Patrick Thoral
    Ari Ercole
    Mark Hoogendoorn
    Paul W. G. Elbers
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2020, 46 : 383 - 400
  • [33] Formal thought disorder in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yalincetin, Berna
    Bora, Emre
    Binbay, Tolga
    Ulas, Halis
    Akdede, Berna Binnur
    Alptekin, Koksal
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2017, 185 : 2 - 8
  • [34] Prevalence and treatment of panic disorder in bipolar disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Preti, Antonio
    Vrublevska, Jelena
    Veroniki, Areti Angeliki
    Huedo-Medina, Tania B.
    Kyriazis, Odysseas
    Fountoulakis, Konstantinos N.
    EVIDENCE-BASED MENTAL HEALTH, 2018, 21 (02) : 53 - 60
  • [35] FORMAL THOUGHT DISORDER IN SCHIZOPHRENIA AND BIPOLAR DISORDER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Alptekin, Koksal
    Yalincetin, Berna
    Bora, Emra
    Akdede, Berna Binnur
    SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2017, 43 : S250 - S250
  • [36] Formal thought disorder in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alptekin, K.
    Yalincetin, B.
    Bora, E.
    Berna, A.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 41 : S185 - S185
  • [37] The application of machine learning techniques in posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Jing
    Ouyang, Hui
    Jiao, Runda
    Cheng, Suhui
    Zhang, Haiyan
    Shang, Zhilei
    Jia, Yanpu
    Yan, Wenjie
    Wu, Lili
    Liu, Weizhi
    NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2024, 7 (01)
  • [38] Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Tianyi
    Chen, Ruiyuan
    Fan, Ning
    Zang, Lei
    Yuan, Shuo
    Du, Peng
    Wu, Qichao
    Wang, Aobo
    Li, Jian
    Kong, Xiaochuan
    Zhu, Wenyi
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26
  • [39] Accuracy of Presepsin in Sepsis Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wu, Jiayuan
    Hu, Liren
    Zhang, Gaohua
    Wu, Fenping
    He, Taiping
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (07):
  • [40] Diagnosis Accuracy for Compartment Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lorange, Justin-Pierre
    Laverdiere, Carl
    Corban, Jason
    Montreuil, Julien
    Harvey, Edward J. J.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2023, 37 (08) : E319 - E325