Machine learning for the diagnosis accuracy of bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Pan, Yi [1 ]
Wang, Pushi [2 ]
Xue, Bowen [3 ,4 ]
Liu, Yanbin [2 ]
Shen, Xinhua [1 ]
Wang, Shiliang [1 ]
Wang, Xing [1 ]
机构
[1] Huzhou Univ, Huzhou Municipal Hosp 3, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Neurosis & Psychosomat Dis, Huzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] NCMHC, Natl Ctr Mental Hlth, Dept Mental Disorders, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Mental Hlth Ctr, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Univ, Hangzhou Peoples Hosp 7, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY | 2025年 / 15卷
关键词
depression; bipolar disorder; machine learning; predictive model; systematic review; DEPRESSION; UNIPOLAR; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1515549
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Diagnosing bipolar disorder poses a challenge in clinical practice and demands a substantial time investment. With the growing utilization of artificial intelligence in mental health, researchers are endeavoring to create AI-based diagnostic models. In this context, some researchers have sought to develop machine learning models for bipolar disorder diagnosis. Nevertheless, the accuracy of these diagnoses remains a subject of controversy. Consequently, we conducted this systematic review to comprehensively assess the diagnostic value of machine learning in the context of bipolar disorder. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science, with the search ending on April 1, 2023. QUADAS-2 was applied to assess the quality of the literature included. In addition, we employed a bivariate mixed-effects model for the meta-analysis. Results: 18 studies were included, covering 3152 participants, including 1858 cases of bipolar disorder. 28 machine learning models were encompassed. Sensitivity and specificity in discriminating between bipolar disorder and normal individuals were 0.88 (9.5% CI: 0.74 similar to 0.95) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.73 similar to 0.96) respectively, and the SROC curve was 0.94(95% CI: 0.92 similar to 0.96). The sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing between bipolar disorder and depression were 0.84 (95%CI: 0.80 similar to 0.87) and 0.82 (95%CI: 0.75 similar to 0.88) respectively. The SROC curve was 0.89 (95%CI: 0.86 similar to 0.91). Conclusions: Machine learning methods can be employed for discriminating and diagnosing bipolar disorder. However, in current research, they are predominantly utilized for binary classification tasks, limiting their progress in clinical practice. Therefore, in future studies, we anticipate the development of more multi-class classification tasks to enhance the clinical applicability of these methods.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bipolar disorder prevalence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature
    Clemente, Adauto S.
    Diniz, Breno S.
    Nicolato, Rodrigo
    Kapczinski, Flavio P.
    Soares, Jair C.
    Firmo, Joselia O.
    Castro-Costa, Erico
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE PSIQUIATRIA, 2015, 37 (02) : 155 - 161
  • [22] Cariprazine in the treatment of Bipolar Disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pinto, Jairo Vinicius
    Saraf, Gayatri
    Vigo, Daniel
    Keramatian, Kamyar
    Chakrabarty, Trisha
    Yatham, Lakshmi N.
    BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2020, 22 (04) : 360 - 371
  • [23] The efficacy of lamotrigine in bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Haenen, N.
    Kamperman, A. M.
    Prodan, A.
    Nolen, W. A.
    Boks, M. P.
    Wesseloo, R.
    BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2024, 26 (05) : 431 - 441
  • [24] The HPA axis in bipolar disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Murri, Martino Belvederi
    Prestia, Davide
    Mondelli, Valeria
    Pariante, Carmine
    Patti, Sara
    Olivieri, Benedetta
    Arzani, Costanza
    Masotti, Mattia
    Respino, Matteo
    Antonioli, Marco
    Vassallo, Linda
    Serafini, Gianluca
    Perna, Giampaolo
    Pompili, Maurizio
    Amore, Mario
    PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2016, 63 : 327 - 342
  • [25] Neurometabolites in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder - A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kraguljac, Nina Vanessa
    Reid, Meredith
    White, David
    Jones, Rebecca
    den Hollander, Jan
    Lowman, Deborah
    Lahti, Adrienne Carol
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING, 2012, 203 (2-3) : 111 - 125
  • [26] Actigraphic features of bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    De Crescenzo, Franco
    Economou, Alexis
    Sharpley, Ann L.
    Gormez, Aynur
    Quested, Digby J.
    SLEEP MEDICINE REVIEWS, 2017, 33 : 58 - 69
  • [27] Machine learning approaches for prediction of bipolar disorder based on biological, clinical and neuropsychological markers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Colombo, F.
    Calesella, F.
    Mazza, M. G.
    Melloni, E. M. T.
    Benedetti, F.
    Vai, B.
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 53 : S61 - S62
  • [28] Machine learning approaches for prediction of bipolar disorder based on biological, clinical and neuropsychological markers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Colombo, Federica
    Calesella, Federico
    Mazza, Mario Gennaro
    Melloni, Elisa Maria Teresa
    Morelli, Marco J.
    Scotti, Giulia Maria
    Benedetti, Francesco
    Bollettini, Irene
    Vai, Benedetta
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2022, 135
  • [29] Machine learning value in the diagnosis of vertebral fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Yue
    Liang, Zhuang
    Li, Yingchun
    Cao, Yang
    Zhang, Hui
    Dong, Bo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 181
  • [30] Accuracy of Machine Learning in Detecting Pediatric Epileptic Seizures: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zou, Zhuan
    Chen, Bin
    Xiao, Dongqiong
    Tang, Fajuan
    Li, Xihong
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26