Machine learning for the diagnosis accuracy of bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Pan, Yi [1 ]
Wang, Pushi [2 ]
Xue, Bowen [3 ,4 ]
Liu, Yanbin [2 ]
Shen, Xinhua [1 ]
Wang, Shiliang [1 ]
Wang, Xing [1 ]
机构
[1] Huzhou Univ, Huzhou Municipal Hosp 3, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Neurosis & Psychosomat Dis, Huzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] NCMHC, Natl Ctr Mental Hlth, Dept Mental Disorders, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Mental Hlth Ctr, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Univ, Hangzhou Peoples Hosp 7, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY | 2025年 / 15卷
关键词
depression; bipolar disorder; machine learning; predictive model; systematic review; DEPRESSION; UNIPOLAR; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1515549
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Diagnosing bipolar disorder poses a challenge in clinical practice and demands a substantial time investment. With the growing utilization of artificial intelligence in mental health, researchers are endeavoring to create AI-based diagnostic models. In this context, some researchers have sought to develop machine learning models for bipolar disorder diagnosis. Nevertheless, the accuracy of these diagnoses remains a subject of controversy. Consequently, we conducted this systematic review to comprehensively assess the diagnostic value of machine learning in the context of bipolar disorder. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science, with the search ending on April 1, 2023. QUADAS-2 was applied to assess the quality of the literature included. In addition, we employed a bivariate mixed-effects model for the meta-analysis. Results: 18 studies were included, covering 3152 participants, including 1858 cases of bipolar disorder. 28 machine learning models were encompassed. Sensitivity and specificity in discriminating between bipolar disorder and normal individuals were 0.88 (9.5% CI: 0.74 similar to 0.95) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.73 similar to 0.96) respectively, and the SROC curve was 0.94(95% CI: 0.92 similar to 0.96). The sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing between bipolar disorder and depression were 0.84 (95%CI: 0.80 similar to 0.87) and 0.82 (95%CI: 0.75 similar to 0.88) respectively. The SROC curve was 0.89 (95%CI: 0.86 similar to 0.91). Conclusions: Machine learning methods can be employed for discriminating and diagnosing bipolar disorder. However, in current research, they are predominantly utilized for binary classification tasks, limiting their progress in clinical practice. Therefore, in future studies, we anticipate the development of more multi-class classification tasks to enhance the clinical applicability of these methods.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy of machine learning in the diagnosis of odontogenic cysts and tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shrivastava, Priyanshu Kumar
    Hasan, Shamimul
    Abid, Laraib
    Injety, Ranjit
    Shrivastav, Ayush Kumar
    Sybil, Deborah
    ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 40 (03) : 342 - 356
  • [2] Diagnosis accuracy of machine learning for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li Cong
    Ying Chen
    Xiaolei He
    MaiLiKai KuErBan
    Chao Wu
    Liping Chen
    European Journal of Medical Research, 30 (1)
  • [3] Clozapine in bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Delgado, Andre
    Velosa, Jorge
    Zhang, Junyu
    Dursun, Serdar M.
    Kapczinski, Flavio
    Cardoso, Taiane de Azevedo
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2020, 125 : 21 - 27
  • [4] Lactate in bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kuang, H.
    Duong, A.
    Jeong, H.
    Zachos, K.
    Andreazza, A. C.
    BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2019, 21 : 25 - 25
  • [5] Lactate in bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kuang, Heidi
    Duong, Angela
    Jeong, Hyunjin
    Zachos, Kassandra
    Andreazza, Ana C.
    PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2018, 72 (08) : 546 - 555
  • [6] Tamoxifen for bipolar disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Palacios, Jorge
    Yildiz, Aysegul
    Young, Allan H.
    Taylor, Matthew J.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 33 (02) : 177 - 184
  • [7] The neuropathology of bipolar disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Harrison, Paul J.
    Colbourne, Lucy
    Harrison, Charlotte H.
    MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 25 (08) : 1787 - 1808
  • [8] Clozapine in bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Delgado, Andre
    Velosa, Jorge
    Zhang, Junyu
    Dursun, Serdar
    Kapczinski, Flavio
    Cardoso, Taiane de Azevedo
    BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2020, 22 : 81 - 81
  • [9] The neuropathology of bipolar disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Paul J. Harrison
    Lucy Colbourne
    Charlotte H. Harrison
    Molecular Psychiatry, 2020, 25 : 1787 - 1808
  • [10] Leptin in bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fernandes, B. S.
    Dash, S.
    Jacka, F.
    Dodd, S.
    Carvalho, A. F.
    Kohler, C. A.
    Steiner, J.
    da Graca, M.
    Nardin, P.
    Goncalves, C. -A.
    Berk, M.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 35 : 1 - 7