Supplemental Screening With MRI in Women With Dense Breasts: The European Perspective

被引:0
|
作者
Kilburn-Toppin, Fleur [1 ]
Allajbeu, Iris [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Healy, Nuala [5 ,6 ]
Gilbert, Fiona J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Radiol, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, Dept Radiol, Cambridge Biomed Campus, Cambridge, England
[3] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Radiol, Cambridge, England
[4] Western Balkans Univ, Sch Clin Med, Tirana, Albania
[5] Beaumont Hosp, Beaumont Breast Ctr, Dublin, Ireland
[6] Royal Coll Surg, Dept Radiol, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
breast cancer; breast density; MRI; screening; CANCER RISK; MAMMOGRAPHY; MORTALITY; MODALITY; US;
D O I
10.1093/jbi/wbae091
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in women in Europe, and while all European countries have some form of screening for breast cancer, disparities in organization and implementation exist. Breast density is a well-established risk factor for breast cancer; however, most countries in Europe do not have recommendations in place for notification of breast density or additional supplementary imaging for women with dense breasts. Various supplemental screening modalities have been investigated in Europe, and when comparing modalities, MRI has been shown to be superior in cancer detection rate and in detecting small invasive disease that may impact long-term survival, as demonstrated in the Dense Tissue and Early Breast Neoplasm Screening (DENSE) trial in the Netherlands. Based on convincing evidence, the European Society of Breast Imaging issued recommendations that women with category D density undergo breast MRI from ages 50 to 70 years at least every 4 years and preferably every 2 to 3 years. However, currently no countries in Europe routinely offer women with BI-RADS category D density breasts MRI as supplemental imaging. The reasons for lack of implementation of MRI screening are multifactorial. Concerns regarding increased recalls have been cited, as have cost and lack of resources. However, studies have demonstrated breast MRI in women with BI-RADS category D density breasts to be cost-effective compared with the current breast cancer screening standard of biannual mammography. Furthermore, abbreviated MRI protocols could facilitate more widespread use of affordable MRI screening. Women's perception on breast density notification and supplemental imaging is key to successful implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 140
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Supplemental breast cancer-screening ultrasonography in women with dense breasts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yuan, Wei-Hsin
    Hsu, Hui-Chen
    Chen, Ying-Yuan
    Wu, Chia-Hung
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 123 (04) : 673 - 688
  • [42] Supplemental breast cancer-screening ultrasonography in women with dense breasts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wei-Hsin Yuan
    Hui-Chen Hsu
    Ying-Yuan Chen
    Chia-Hung Wu
    British Journal of Cancer, 2020, 123 : 673 - 688
  • [43] 3D Supine Automated Ultrasound (SAUS, ABUS, ABVS) for Supplemental Screening Women with Dense Breasts
    Mundinger, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH, 2016, 12 (02): : 52 - 55
  • [44] Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force
    Melnikow, Joy
    Fenton, Joshua J.
    Whitlock, Evelyn P.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Weyrich, Meghan S.
    Thompson, Jamie H.
    Shah, Kunal
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 164 (04) : 268 - +
  • [45] Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening in Women with Dense Breasts and Negative Mammography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hussein, Heba
    Abbas, Engy
    Keshavarzi, Sareh
    Fazelzad, Rouhi
    Bukhanov, Karina
    Kulkarni, Supriya
    Au, Frederick
    Ghai, Sandeep
    Alabousi, Abdullah
    Freitas, Vivianne
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 306 (03)
  • [46] Role of Supplemental Breast MRI in Screening Women with Mammographically Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (vol 6, pg 355, 2024)
    Faheem, Michael
    Tam, Hui Zhen
    Nojoum, Magd
    Suaris, Tamara
    Jahan, Noor
    Lloyd, Thomas
    Johnson, Laura
    Aggarwal, Shweta
    Ullah, MdZaker
    Thompson, Erik W.
    Brentnall, Adam R.
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2024,
  • [47] Abbreviated Breast MRI for Supplemental Screening in Patients With Dense Breasts: Comparison of Baseline Versus Subsequent-Round Examinations
    Edmonds, Christine E.
    Weinstein, Susan P.
    McDonald, Elizabeth S.
    Bagheri, Sina
    Zuckerman, Samantha P.
    O'Brien, Sophia R.
    Schnall, Mitchell D.
    Conant, Emily F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2024, 223 (01)
  • [48] Comment on “Supplemental breast cancer-screening ultrasonography in women with dense breasts: a systematic review and meta-analysis”
    Rama Jayaraj
    Peter Shaw
    Sameep Shetty
    Chellan Kumaraswamy
    K. M. Gothandam
    M. Ravishankar Ram
    Siddhartha Baxi
    British Journal of Cancer, 2021, 124 : 1891 - 1892
  • [49] Comment on "Supplemental breast cancer-screening ultrasonography in women with dense breasts: a systematic review and meta-analysis"
    Jayaraj, Rama
    Shaw, Peter
    Shetty, Sameep
    Kumaraswamy, Chellan
    Gothandam, K. M.
    Ravishankar Ram, M.
    Baxi, Siddhartha
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 124 (11) : 1891 - 1892
  • [50] The Impact of Dense Breasts on the Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis: A Review and Options for Supplemental Screening
    Gordon, Paula B.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (05) : 3595 - 3636