Abbreviated Breast MRI for Supplemental Screening in Patients With Dense Breasts: Comparison of Baseline Versus Subsequent-Round Examinations

被引:3
|
作者
Edmonds, Christine E. [1 ]
Weinstein, Susan P. [1 ]
McDonald, Elizabeth S. [1 ]
Bagheri, Sina [1 ]
Zuckerman, Samantha P. [1 ]
O'Brien, Sophia R. [1 ]
Schnall, Mitchell D. [1 ]
Conant, Emily F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
abbreviated breast MRI; breast can-cer screening; dense breasts; fast MRI; supplemental screening; RISK; CANCER; WOMEN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; PROTOCOL; ULTRASOUND; INTERVAL; US;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.24.31098
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Abbreviated breast MRI (AB-MRI) achieves a higher cancer detection rate (CDR) than digital breast tomosynthesis when applied for baseline (i.e., firstround) supplemental screening of individuals with dense breasts. Limited literature has OBJECTIVE. This study aimed to compare outcomes between baseline and subsequent rounds of screening AB-MRI in individuals with dense breasts who otherwise had an average risk for breast cancer. METHODS. This retrospective study included patients with dense breasts who otherwise had an average risk for breast cancer and underwent AB-MRI for supplemental screening between December 20, 2016, and May 10, 2023. The clinical interpretations and results of recommended biopsies for AB-MRI examinations were extracted from the EMR. Baseline and subsequent-round AB-MRI examinations were compared. RESULTS. The final sample included 2585 AB-MRI examinations (2007 baseline and 578 subsequent-round examinations) performed for supplemental screening of 2007 women (mean age, 57.1 years old) with dense breasts. Of 2007 baseline examinations, 1658 (82.6%) were assessed as BI-RADS category 1 or 2, 171 (8.5%) as BI-RADS category 3, and 178 (8.9%) as BI-RADS category 4 or 5. Of 578 subsequent-round examinations, 533 (92.2%) were assessed as BI-RADS category 1 or 2, 20 (3.5%) as BI-RADS category 3, and 25 (4.3%) as BI-RADS category 4 or 5 (p < .001). The abnormal interpretation rate (AIR) was 17.4% (349/2007) for baseline examinations versus 7.8% (45/578) for subsequent-round examinations (p < .001). For baseline examinations, PPV2 was 21.3% (38/178), PPV3 was 26.6% (38/143), and the CDR was 18.9 cancers per 1000 examinations (38/2007). For subsequent-round examinations, PPV2 was 28.0% (7/25) (p = .45), PPV3 was 29.2% (7/24) (p = .81), and the CDR was 12.1 cancers per 1000 examinations (7/578) (p = .37). All 45 cancers diagnosed by baseline or subsequent-round AB-MRI were stage 0 or 1. Seven cancers diagnosed by subsequent-round AB-MRI had a mean interval of 872 +/- 373 (SD) days since prior AB-MRI and node-negative status at surgical axillary evaluation; six had an invasive component, all measuring 1.2 cm or less. CONCLUSION. Subsequent rounds of AB-MRI screening of individuals with dense breasts had lower AIR than baseline examinations while maintaining a high CDR. All cancers detected by subsequent-round examinations were early-stage node-negative cancers. CLINICAL IMPACT. The findings support sequential AB-MRI for supplemental screening in individuals with dense breasts. Further investigations are warranted to optimize the screening interval.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Supplemental Breast MRI for Women with Extremely Dense Breasts: Results of the Second Screening Round of the DENSE Trial
    Veenhuizen, Stefanie G. A.
    de Lange, Stephanie, V
    Bakker, Marije F.
    Pijnappel, Ruud M.
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Monninkhof, Evelyn M.
    Emaus, Marleen J.
    De Koekkoek-Doll, Petra K.
    Bisschops, Robertus H. C.
    Lobbes, Marc B., I
    de Jong, Mathijn D. F.
    Duvivier, Katya M.
    Veltman, Jeroen
    Karssemeijer, Nico
    de Koning, Harry J.
    van Diest, Paul J.
    Mali, Willem P. T. M.
    van den Bosch, Maurice A. A. J.
    van Gils, Carla H.
    Veldhuis, Wouter B.
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 299 (02) : 278 - 286
  • [3] Abbreviated Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Supplemental Screening of Women With Dense Breasts and Average Risk
    Weinstein, Susan P.
    Korhonen, Katrina
    Cirelli, Claire
    Schnall, Mitchell D.
    McDonald, Elizabeth S.
    Pantel, Austin R.
    Zuckerman, Samantha
    Borthakur, Ari
    Conant, Emily F.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (33) : 3874 - 3882
  • [4] Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening
    Comstock, Christopher E.
    Gatsonis, Constantine
    Newstead, Gillian M.
    Snyder, Bradley S.
    Gareen, Ilana F.
    Bergin, Jennifer T.
    Rahbar, Habib
    Sung, Janice S.
    Jacobs, Christina
    Harvey, Jennifer A.
    Nicholson, Mary H.
    Ward, Robert C.
    Holt, Jacqueline
    Prather, Andrew
    Miller, Kathy D.
    Schnall, Mitchell D.
    Kuhl, Christiane K.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 323 (08): : 746 - 756
  • [5] Performance of abbreviated protocols versus unenhanced MRI in detecting occult breast lesions of mammography in patients with dense breasts
    Peipei Chen
    Guangrui Shao
    Baijie Li
    Huikun Zhang
    Juan Xiao
    Suhong Zhao
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [6] Performance of abbreviated protocols versus unenhanced MRI in detecting occult breast lesions of mammography in patients with dense breasts
    Chen, Peipei
    Shao, Guangrui
    Li, Baijie
    Zhang, Huikun
    Xiao, Juan
    Zhao, Suhong
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [7] Commentary on "Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening"
    Greenwood, Heather I.
    Freimanis, Rita I.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 216 (01) : 37 - 37
  • [8] Re-attendance in supplemental breast MRI screening rounds of the DENSE trial for women with extremely dense breasts
    Veenhuizen, Stefanie G. A.
    van Grinsven, Sophie E. L.
    Laseur, Isabelle L.
    Bakker, Marije F.
    Monninkhof, Evelyn M.
    de Lange, Stephanie V.
    Pijnappel, Ruud M.
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Lobbes, Marc B. I.
    Duvivier, Katya M.
    de Jong, Mathijn D. F.
    Loo, Claudette E.
    Karssemeijer, Nico
    van Diest, Paul J.
    Veldhuis, Wouter B.
    van Gils, Carla H.
    van Gils, C. H.
    Bakker, M. F.
    van Grinsven, S. E. L.
    de Lange, S., V
    Veenhuizen, S. G. A.
    Veldhuis, W. B.
    Pijnappel, R. M.
    Emaus, M. J.
    Monninkhof, E. M.
    Fernandez-Gallardo, M. A.
    van den Bosch, M. A. A. J.
    van Diest, P. J.
    Mann, R. M.
    Mus, R.
    Imhof-Tas, M.
    Karssemeijer, N.
    Loo, C. E.
    de Koekkoek-Doll, P. K.
    Winter-Warnars, H. A. O.
    Bisschops, R. H. C.
    Kock, M. C. J. M.
    Storm, R. K.
    van der Valk, P. H. M.
    Lobbes, M. B., I
    Gommers, S.
    Lobbes, M. B., I
    de Jong, M. D. F.
    Rutten, M. J. C. M.
    Duvivier, K. M.
    de Graaf, P.
    Veltman, J.
    Bourez, R. L. J. H.
    de Koning, H. J.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (10) : 6334 - 6347
  • [9] Supplemental MRI in Extremely Dense Breasts: Sharp Reduction in False-Positive Rate in the Second Screening Round of the DENSE Trial
    Moy, Linda
    Gao, Yiming
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 299 (02) : 287 - 289
  • [10] Editorial Comment: What Does Advertising Abbreviated Breast MRI to Patients With Dense Breasts Accomplish?
    Margolies, Laurie R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2024, 223 (01)