Supplemental Screening With MRI in Women With Dense Breasts: The European Perspective

被引:0
|
作者
Kilburn-Toppin, Fleur [1 ]
Allajbeu, Iris [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Healy, Nuala [5 ,6 ]
Gilbert, Fiona J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Radiol, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, Dept Radiol, Cambridge Biomed Campus, Cambridge, England
[3] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Radiol, Cambridge, England
[4] Western Balkans Univ, Sch Clin Med, Tirana, Albania
[5] Beaumont Hosp, Beaumont Breast Ctr, Dublin, Ireland
[6] Royal Coll Surg, Dept Radiol, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
breast cancer; breast density; MRI; screening; CANCER RISK; MAMMOGRAPHY; MORTALITY; MODALITY; US;
D O I
10.1093/jbi/wbae091
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in women in Europe, and while all European countries have some form of screening for breast cancer, disparities in organization and implementation exist. Breast density is a well-established risk factor for breast cancer; however, most countries in Europe do not have recommendations in place for notification of breast density or additional supplementary imaging for women with dense breasts. Various supplemental screening modalities have been investigated in Europe, and when comparing modalities, MRI has been shown to be superior in cancer detection rate and in detecting small invasive disease that may impact long-term survival, as demonstrated in the Dense Tissue and Early Breast Neoplasm Screening (DENSE) trial in the Netherlands. Based on convincing evidence, the European Society of Breast Imaging issued recommendations that women with category D density undergo breast MRI from ages 50 to 70 years at least every 4 years and preferably every 2 to 3 years. However, currently no countries in Europe routinely offer women with BI-RADS category D density breasts MRI as supplemental imaging. The reasons for lack of implementation of MRI screening are multifactorial. Concerns regarding increased recalls have been cited, as have cost and lack of resources. However, studies have demonstrated breast MRI in women with BI-RADS category D density breasts to be cost-effective compared with the current breast cancer screening standard of biannual mammography. Furthermore, abbreviated MRI protocols could facilitate more widespread use of affordable MRI screening. Women's perception on breast density notification and supplemental imaging is key to successful implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 140
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Screening Outcomes of Supplemental Automated Breast US in Asian Women with Dense and Nondense Breasts
    Kwon, Mi-ri
    Choi, Ji Soo
    Lee, Mi Yeon
    Kim, Sinae
    Ko, Eun Sook
    Ko, Eun Young
    Han, Boo Kyung
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 307 (04)
  • [22] Supplemental MRI Screening for Women with Extremely Dense Breast Tissue
    Bakker, Marije F.
    de Lange, Stephanie V.
    Pijnappel, Ruud M.
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Peeters, Petra H. M.
    Monninkhof, Evelyn M.
    Emaus, Marleen J.
    Loo, Claudette E.
    Bisschops, Robertus H. C.
    Lobbes, Marc B. I.
    de Jong, Matthijn D. F.
    Duvivier, Katya M.
    Veltman, Jeroen
    Karssemeijer, Nico
    de Koning, Harry J.
    van Diest, Paul J.
    Mali, Willem P. T. M.
    van den Bosch, Maurice A. A. J.
    Veldhuis, Wouter B.
    van Gils, Carla H.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 381 (22): : 2091 - 2102
  • [23] Racial/ethnic differences in supplemental imaging for breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts
    Ezratty, Charlotte
    Vang, Suzanne
    Brown, Jordonna
    Margolies, Laurie R.
    Jandorf, Lina
    Lin, Jenny J.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2020, 182 (01) : 181 - 185
  • [24] Racial/ethnic differences in supplemental imaging for breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts
    Charlotte Ezratty
    Suzanne Vang
    Jordonna Brown
    Laurie R. Margolies
    Lina Jandorf
    Jenny J. Lin
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2020, 182 : 181 - 185
  • [25] Supplemental breast cancer screening after negative mammography in US women with dense breasts
    Foster, Victoria M.
    Trentham-Dietz, Amy
    Stout, Natasha K.
    Lee, Christoph, I
    Ichikawa, Laura E.
    Eavey, Joanna
    Henderson, Louise
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Bowles, Erin A.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Sprague, Brian L.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2024,
  • [26] Supplemental Screening With Automated Breast Ultrasound in Women With Dense Breasts: Comparing Notification Methods and Screening Behaviors
    Aripoli, Allison
    Fountain, Kelly
    Winblad, Onalisa
    Gatewood, Jason
    Hill, Jacqueline
    Wick, Jo A.
    Inciardi, Marc
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (01) : W22 - W28
  • [27] Abbreviated Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Supplemental Screening of Women With Dense Breasts and Average Risk
    Weinstein, Susan P.
    Korhonen, Katrina
    Cirelli, Claire
    Schnall, Mitchell D.
    McDonald, Elizabeth S.
    Pantel, Austin R.
    Zuckerman, Samantha
    Borthakur, Ari
    Conant, Emily F.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (33) : 3874 - 3882
  • [28] Screening with breast sonography in women with dense breasts
    Crystal, P
    Strano, S
    Shcharinsky, S
    Verthaim, M
    Koretz, M
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 38 : S142 - S142
  • [29] Supplemental MRI in Extremely Dense Breasts: Sharp Reduction in False-Positive Rate in the Second Screening Round of the DENSE Trial
    Moy, Linda
    Gao, Yiming
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 299 (02) : 287 - 289
  • [30] Meta-Analysis of Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening Modalities in Women with Dense Breasts and Negative Mammography
    Tran, Evelyn
    Ray, Kimberly
    RADIOLOGY-IMAGING CANCER, 2023, 5 (03):