Propofol Priming for Enhancing Induction Safety in Hypertensive Patients: A Prospective Double-blind Randomised Controlled Trial

被引:0
|
作者
Yadav, Tarun [1 ]
Golhar, Mayuri [1 ]
Saini, Chhavi [1 ]
机构
[1] Pt BD Sharma PGIMS, Dept Anaesthesiol, Rohtak, Haryana, India
关键词
Dose; Hypotension; General anaesthesia; COINDUCTION; ANESTHESIA;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2025/76353.20448
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Propofol is popular for inducing general anaesthesia, but it has drawbacks such as hypotension and bradycardia in a dose-dependent manner, especially in hypertensive patients. Reducing the total dose of Propofol using the priming principle has proven to be effective; however, it has not been studied in high-risk hypertensive patients. Therefore, the current study was planned. Aim: To evaluate the effects of priming on Propofol induction in controlled hypertensive patients, with objectives to assess haemodynamic parameters, total dose, and side- effects. Materials and Methods: This prospective, comparative, double-blind randomised controlled trail was performed at the Department of Anaesthesiology, Pt. Bhagwat Dayal Sharma (B.D.) Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (PGIMS) Rohtak, Haryana, India, from April 2023 to April 2024. A total of 60 patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia with controlled hypertension were randomly assigned to either Group 1 (study group, n=30), where Propofol priming was used, or Group 2 (control group, n=30). Demographics, total Propofol dose, haemodynamic parameters {Heart Rate (HR), Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)}, and adverse events were evaluated using International Bussiness Machine (IBM) Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used for normalisation, and the Mann's-Whitney U test, Independent t-test, and Chi-square test were used for data analysis. Results: In Group 1 (study), the mean age was 49.36 +/- 9.42 years, while in Group 2 (control), it was 49.36 +/- 9.19 years (p=0.91). A lesser dose of Propofol was needed in the study group (Group 1) (90.07 +/- 19.73 mg) compared to the control group (Group 2) (120.00 +/- 21.81 mg) (p=0.001). Haemodynamic alterations were more pronounced in the controls compared to the study group. After induction, a significant fall in MAP was observed in the controls compared to the study group (67.63 +/- 5.86 mmHg vs. 90.63 +/- 4.33 mmHg) (p=0.001). Adverse effects, such as pain at the injection site, were reported in one patient (n=1) in Group 2. Conclusion: The priming principle significantly reduces the total Propofol dose and leads to more stable haemodynamics during general anaesthesia induction in controlled hypertensive patients. Priming with Propofol is advised for patients with hypertension when inducing general anaesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:UC1 / UC5
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of propofol and ciprofol in patients undergoing bronchoscopy: protocol for a double-blind, randomised controlled trial
    Tang, Jinxuan
    Chen, Fang
    Huang, Jiayu
    Li, Dongliang
    Li, Cheng
    BMJ OPEN, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [2] The efficacy and safety of ciprofol and propofol in patients undergoing colonoscopy: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
    Gao, Shi-Hui
    Tang, Qian-Qian
    Wang, Chang-Ming
    Guan, Zhan-Ying
    Wang, Ling-Ling
    Zhang, Jing
    Yan, Zeng-Long
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2024, 95
  • [3] A randomised, prospective double-blind, propiverine-controlled trial of imidafenacin in patients with overactive bladder
    Park, C.
    Park, J.
    Choo, M-S
    Kim, J. C.
    Lee, J. G.
    Lee, J. Z.
    Lee, K-S
    Kim, D. Y.
    Lee, S-J
    Seo, J. T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2014, 68 (02) : 188 - 196
  • [4] The Effect of Prophylactic Ephedrine on Systemic Hypotension Caused by Induction of Anaesthesia with Propofol and Sufentanil in Elderly Hypertensive Patients: A Prospective Randomized, Double-blind Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial
    Zhang Xinpei
    Yin Kaiyu
    Huang Yabei
    Peng Mingqing
    SIGNA VITAE, 2021, 17 (01) : 133 - 138
  • [5] Target-controlled infusion during monitored anesthesia care in patients undergoing EUS: Propofol alone versus midazolam plus propofol A prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial
    Fanti, L.
    Agostoni, M.
    Arcidiacono, P. G.
    Albertin, A.
    Strini, G.
    Carrara, S.
    Guslandi, M.
    Torri, G.
    Testoni, P. A.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2007, 39 (01) : 81 - 86
  • [6] Immunonutrition in critically ill patients with liver disease; A prospective randomised double-blind controlled trial.
    Clarke, S
    Bernal, W
    Rees, G
    Wendon, J
    HEPATOLOGY, 2004, 40 (04) : 500A - 500A
  • [7] Safety and efficacy of pitolisant on cataplexy in patients with narcolepsy: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Szakacs, Zoltan
    Dauvilliers, Yves
    Mikhaylov, Vladimir
    Poverennova, Irina
    Krylov, Sergei
    Jankovic, Slavko
    Sonka, Karel
    Lehert, Philippe
    Lecomte, Isabelle
    Lecomte, Jeanne-Marie
    Schwartz, Jean-Charles
    LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2017, 16 (03): : 200 - 207
  • [8] The efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol in patients undergoing painless hysteroscopy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
    Li, Aijun
    Li, Ning
    Zhu, Lei
    Xu, Zige
    Wang, Yifan
    Li, Junjie
    Zhang, Gerong
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [9] Efficacy and Safety of a Subanesthetic Dose of Esketamine Combined with Propofol in Patients with Obesity Undergoing Painless Gastroscopy: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Zheng, Longbin
    Wang, Yiteng
    Ma, Qing
    Liang, Wenbo
    Zhang, Xiaojing
    Ren, Zhiqiang
    Qin, Weimin
    Meng, Fan
    Li, Yuhong
    Fan, Guoxiang
    Yin, Ning
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2023, 17 : 1347 - 1356
  • [10] Efficacy and Safety of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Diabetes: A Double-Blind, Randomised, Controlled Trial
    Ji, Linong
    Tong, Xiaolin
    Wang, Hongyuan
    Tian, Haoming
    Zhou, Huimin
    Zhang, Lili
    Li, Qifu
    Wang, Yizhong
    Li, Hongmei
    Liu, Min
    Yang, Hongjie
    Gao, Yanbin
    Li, Yan
    Li, Quanmin
    Guo, Xiaohui
    Yang, Gangyi
    Zhang, Zhongai
    Zhou, Zhiguang
    Ning, Guang
    Chen, Yingli
    Paul, Sanjoy
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (02):