Propofol Priming for Enhancing Induction Safety in Hypertensive Patients: A Prospective Double-blind Randomised Controlled Trial

被引:0
|
作者
Yadav, Tarun [1 ]
Golhar, Mayuri [1 ]
Saini, Chhavi [1 ]
机构
[1] Pt BD Sharma PGIMS, Dept Anaesthesiol, Rohtak, Haryana, India
关键词
Dose; Hypotension; General anaesthesia; COINDUCTION; ANESTHESIA;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2025/76353.20448
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Propofol is popular for inducing general anaesthesia, but it has drawbacks such as hypotension and bradycardia in a dose-dependent manner, especially in hypertensive patients. Reducing the total dose of Propofol using the priming principle has proven to be effective; however, it has not been studied in high-risk hypertensive patients. Therefore, the current study was planned. Aim: To evaluate the effects of priming on Propofol induction in controlled hypertensive patients, with objectives to assess haemodynamic parameters, total dose, and side- effects. Materials and Methods: This prospective, comparative, double-blind randomised controlled trail was performed at the Department of Anaesthesiology, Pt. Bhagwat Dayal Sharma (B.D.) Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (PGIMS) Rohtak, Haryana, India, from April 2023 to April 2024. A total of 60 patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia with controlled hypertension were randomly assigned to either Group 1 (study group, n=30), where Propofol priming was used, or Group 2 (control group, n=30). Demographics, total Propofol dose, haemodynamic parameters {Heart Rate (HR), Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)}, and adverse events were evaluated using International Bussiness Machine (IBM) Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used for normalisation, and the Mann's-Whitney U test, Independent t-test, and Chi-square test were used for data analysis. Results: In Group 1 (study), the mean age was 49.36 +/- 9.42 years, while in Group 2 (control), it was 49.36 +/- 9.19 years (p=0.91). A lesser dose of Propofol was needed in the study group (Group 1) (90.07 +/- 19.73 mg) compared to the control group (Group 2) (120.00 +/- 21.81 mg) (p=0.001). Haemodynamic alterations were more pronounced in the controls compared to the study group. After induction, a significant fall in MAP was observed in the controls compared to the study group (67.63 +/- 5.86 mmHg vs. 90.63 +/- 4.33 mmHg) (p=0.001). Adverse effects, such as pain at the injection site, were reported in one patient (n=1) in Group 2. Conclusion: The priming principle significantly reduces the total Propofol dose and leads to more stable haemodynamics during general anaesthesia induction in controlled hypertensive patients. Priming with Propofol is advised for patients with hypertension when inducing general anaesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:UC1 / UC5
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Propofol Versus Thiopental for Rapid-Sequence Induction in Isolated Systolic Hypertensive Patients: A Factorial Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial
    Aslan, Nesrin Ahu
    Vural, Cagil
    Yilmaz, Ali Abbas
    Alanoglu, Zekeriyya
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATION, 2018, 46 (05) : 367 - 372
  • [32] Clinical efficacy of metoclopramide to treat pain and nausea in renal colic patients: a prospective randomised, double-blind, controlled trial
    Kaya, F. Baloglu
    Cevik, A. A.
    Acar, N.
    Kaya, S.
    Zeytin, A. T.
    Can, C.
    Metintas, S.
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 22 (02) : 93 - 99
  • [33] Quality of Life in patients with Marfan syndrome included in a randomised controlled double-blind trial
    De Nobele, S.
    Loeys, B.
    De Paepe, A.
    De Backer, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2011, 10 : S17 - S17
  • [34] Acupuncture for the induction of labour: a double-blind randomised controlled study Reply
    Smith, J. R.
    Ghaem-Maghami, S.
    McIndoe, A.
    Farthing, A.
    Mason, P.
    Ungar, L.
    Del Priore, G.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (03) : 377 - 378
  • [35] Effect of alkalinisation of lignocaine for propofol injection pain: a prospective, randomised, double-blind study
    Ozgul, U.
    Begec, Z.
    Erdogan, M. A.
    Aydogan, M. S.
    Sanli, M.
    Colak, C.
    Durmus, M.
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2013, 41 (04) : 501 - 504
  • [36] SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY OF ZS-9 IN A MULTICENTER, RANDOMISED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL IN PATIENTS WITH HYPERKALAEMIA
    Packham, David K.
    Rasmussen, Henrik S.
    Lavin, Philip T.
    Yang, Alex
    Qunibi, Wajeh Y.
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 29 : 184 - 184
  • [37] Randomised placebo-controlled double-blind trial to assess safety and efficacy of erythropoietin in patients with Friedreich's ataxia
    Mariotti, C.
    Fancellu, R.
    Nanetti, L.
    Solari, A.
    Martini, A.
    Di Bella, D.
    Plumari, M.
    Lauria, G.
    Cappellini, M. D.
    Taroni, F.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2008, 255 : 65 - 66
  • [38] Discharge readiness after remimazolam versus propofol for colonoscopy A randomised, double-blind trial
    Yao, Yusheng
    Guan, Jinsheng
    Liu, Linwei
    Fu, Bingbing
    Chen, Lei
    Zheng, Xiaochun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 39 (12) : 911 - 917
  • [39] Cophenylcaine spray vs. placebo in flexible nasendoscopy: a prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial
    Georgalas, C
    Sandhu, G
    Frosh, A
    Xenellis, J
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2005, 59 (02) : 130 - 133
  • [40] Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Conscious Sedation in Awake Craniotomy: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized, and Controlled Clinical Trial
    Shen, She-liang
    Zheng, Jia-yin
    Zhang, Jun
    Wang, Wen-yuan
    Jin, Tao
    Zhu, Jing
    Zhang, Qi
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2013, 47 (11) : 1391 - 1399