Propofol Priming for Enhancing Induction Safety in Hypertensive Patients: A Prospective Double-blind Randomised Controlled Trial

被引:0
|
作者
Yadav, Tarun [1 ]
Golhar, Mayuri [1 ]
Saini, Chhavi [1 ]
机构
[1] Pt BD Sharma PGIMS, Dept Anaesthesiol, Rohtak, Haryana, India
关键词
Dose; Hypotension; General anaesthesia; COINDUCTION; ANESTHESIA;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2025/76353.20448
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Propofol is popular for inducing general anaesthesia, but it has drawbacks such as hypotension and bradycardia in a dose-dependent manner, especially in hypertensive patients. Reducing the total dose of Propofol using the priming principle has proven to be effective; however, it has not been studied in high-risk hypertensive patients. Therefore, the current study was planned. Aim: To evaluate the effects of priming on Propofol induction in controlled hypertensive patients, with objectives to assess haemodynamic parameters, total dose, and side- effects. Materials and Methods: This prospective, comparative, double-blind randomised controlled trail was performed at the Department of Anaesthesiology, Pt. Bhagwat Dayal Sharma (B.D.) Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (PGIMS) Rohtak, Haryana, India, from April 2023 to April 2024. A total of 60 patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia with controlled hypertension were randomly assigned to either Group 1 (study group, n=30), where Propofol priming was used, or Group 2 (control group, n=30). Demographics, total Propofol dose, haemodynamic parameters {Heart Rate (HR), Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)}, and adverse events were evaluated using International Bussiness Machine (IBM) Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used for normalisation, and the Mann's-Whitney U test, Independent t-test, and Chi-square test were used for data analysis. Results: In Group 1 (study), the mean age was 49.36 +/- 9.42 years, while in Group 2 (control), it was 49.36 +/- 9.19 years (p=0.91). A lesser dose of Propofol was needed in the study group (Group 1) (90.07 +/- 19.73 mg) compared to the control group (Group 2) (120.00 +/- 21.81 mg) (p=0.001). Haemodynamic alterations were more pronounced in the controls compared to the study group. After induction, a significant fall in MAP was observed in the controls compared to the study group (67.63 +/- 5.86 mmHg vs. 90.63 +/- 4.33 mmHg) (p=0.001). Adverse effects, such as pain at the injection site, were reported in one patient (n=1) in Group 2. Conclusion: The priming principle significantly reduces the total Propofol dose and leads to more stable haemodynamics during general anaesthesia induction in controlled hypertensive patients. Priming with Propofol is advised for patients with hypertension when inducing general anaesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:UC1 / UC5
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparing propofol with placebo for early resolution of acute migraine in adult emergency department patients: A double-blind randomised controlled trial
    Meek, Robert
    Graudins, Andis
    McDonald, Micah
    McGannon, Daniel
    Limm, Ezra
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2021, 33 (03) : 465 - 472
  • [22] Haemodynamic stability during anaesthesia induction with propofol - impact of phenylephrine. A double-blind, randomised clinical trial
    Kamenik, Mirt
    Kos, Darjan
    Petrun, Andreja Moller
    Green, David W.
    Zorko, Nuska
    Mekis, Dusan
    SIGNA VITAE, 2018, 14 (01) : 20 - 26
  • [23] SELECTIVE OR TRUNCAL VAGOTOMY - A DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    KENNEDY, T
    CONNELL, AM
    LANCET, 1969, 1 (7601): : 899 - &
  • [24] Randomised double-blind placebo controlled trial comparing oral with vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour
    Yenuberi, H.
    Abraham, A.
    Sebastian, A.
    Benjamin, S.
    Londhe, V
    Mathews, J.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 121 : 94 - 95
  • [25] Azithromycin for acute bronchitis: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial
    Evans, AT
    Husain, S
    Durairaj, L
    Sadowski, LS
    Charles-Damte, M
    Wang, Y
    LANCET, 2002, 359 (9318): : 1648 - 1654
  • [26] Evaluation of antioxidant treatment in presbyacusis: prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised trial
    Polanski, J. F.
    Cruz, O. L.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2013, 127 (02): : 134 - 141
  • [27] Ciprofol versus propofol for anesthesia induction in cardiac surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial
    Yu, Le
    Liu, Xiang
    Zhao, Xiang
    Shan, Xiu
    Bischof, Evelyne
    Lu, Hui-hong
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [28] A prospective, double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover trial of azithromycin in paediatric cystic fibrosis
    Equi, A
    Bush, A
    Balfour-Lynn, IM
    Rosenthal, M
    THORAX, 2002, 57
  • [29] DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL OF FENFLURAMINE IN OBESE HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS
    WAALMANNING, HJ
    SIMPSON, FO
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO MEDICAL SCHOOL, 1969, 47 (01): : 35 - +
  • [30] Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib in Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial
    Harish, B., V
    Sahoo, Rasmi Ranjan
    Gochhait, Samanyoya
    Patro, Pradeepta Sekhar
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2025, 20 (01) : 27 - 34