The efficacy and safety of ciprofol and propofol in patients undergoing colonoscopy: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial

被引:2
|
作者
Gao, Shi-Hui [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Qian-Qian [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Chang-Ming [2 ]
Guan, Zhan-Ying [3 ]
Wang, Ling-Ling [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Jing [2 ]
Yan, Zeng-Long [4 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Med Univ, Dalian, Peoples R China
[2] China Med Univ, Peoples Hosp Liaoning Prov, Peoples Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, 33 Wenyi Rd, Shenyang 110016, Peoples R China
[3] Jinqiu Hosp Liaoning Prov, Dept Anesthesiol, Shenyang, Peoples R China
[4] China Med Univ, Peoples Hosp, Liao Ning Provical Peoples Hosp, Dept Extraskeletal Surg 3, Shenyang, Peoples R China
关键词
Ciprofol; Propofol; Colonoscopy; Sedation; SEDATION; COMBINATION; ANESTHESIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111474
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study objective: Propofol is a commonly utilized anesthetic for painless colonoscopy, but its usage is occasionally limited due to its potential side effects, including cardiopulmonary suppression and injection pain. To address this limitation, the novel compound ciprofol has been proposed as a possible alternative for propofol. This study sought to determine whether there are any differences in the safety and efficacy of propofol and ciprofol for painless colonoscopy. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Setting: Single-centre, class A tertiary hospital, November 2021 to November 2022. Patients: Adult, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I to II and body mass index of 18 to 30 kg m(-2) patients scheduled to undergo colonoscopy. Interventions: Consecutive patients were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive sedation for colonoscopy with ciprofol (group C) or propofol (group P). Measurements: The primary outcome was the success rate of colonoscopy. The secondary outcomes were onset time of sedation, operation time, recovery time and discharge time, patients and endoscopists satisfaction, side effects (e.g. injection pain, myoclonus, drowsiness, dizziness, procedure recall, nausea and vomiting) and incidence rate of cardiopulmonary adverse events. Main results: No significant difference was found in the success rate of colonoscopy between the two groups (ciprofol 96.3% vs. propofol 97.6%; mean difference - 1.2%, 95% CI: -6.5% to 4.0%, P = 0.650). However, group C showed prolonged sedation (63.4 vs. 54.8 s, P < 0.001) and fully alert times (9 vs 8 min, P = 0.013), as well as reduced incidences of injection pain (0 vs. 40.2%, P < 0.001), respiratory depression (2.4% vs. 13.4%, P = 0.021) and hypotension (65.9% vs. 80.5%, P = 0.034). Patients satisfaction was also higher in Group C (10 vs 9, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Ciprofol can be used independently for colonoscopy. When comparing the sedation efficacy of ciprofol and propofol, a 0.4 mg kg(-1) dose of ciprofol proved to be equal to a 2.0 mg kg(-1) dose of propofol, with fewer side effects and greater patient satisfaction during the procedure.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative efficacy and safety of ciprofol, propofol, and propofol and etomidate mixture, and ciprofol and etomidate mixture in patients undergoing painless gastroscopy: A randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial
    Liu, Yanlong
    Qian, Yihong
    Zhang, Lilan
    Guo, Shanliang
    Fan, Longcheng
    Zhang, Mingsheng
    Liu, Zhongyu
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (36)
  • [2] Efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate in patients with obesity undergoing painless colonoscopy: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial
    Deng, Lei
    Zhou, Rui
    Jiang, Wencai
    Zhai, Wenhu
    Chen, Xuemeng
    Xia, Leqiang
    Xiong, Chao
    Zhou, Yukai
    Zhang, Xianjie
    Peng, Yanhua
    [J]. SIGNA VITAE, 2024, 20 (07) : 76 - 85
  • [3] Combination of propofol and dezocine to improve safety and efficacy of anesthesia for gastroscopy and colonoscopy in adults: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
    Li, Xue-Ting
    Ma, Chao-Qun
    Qi, Si-Hua
    Zhang, Li-Min
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2019, 7 (20) : 3237 - 3246
  • [4] Combination of propofol and dezocine to improve safety and efficacy of anesthesia for gastroscopy and colonoscopy in adults: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
    Xue-Ting Li
    Chao-Qun Ma
    Si-Hua Qi
    Li-Min Zhang
    [J]. World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2019, (20) : 3237 - 3246
  • [5] The efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for deep sedation during colonoscopy: A phase III, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial
    Li Junxiang
    Wang Xiao
    Liu Jin
    Wang Xia
    Zuo YunXia
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2021, 133 (3S_SUPPL): : 264 - 264
  • [6] Efficacy and Safety of a Subanesthetic Dose of Esketamine Combined with Propofol in Patients with Obesity Undergoing Painless Gastroscopy: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Zheng, Longbin
    Wang, Yiteng
    Ma, Qing
    Liang, Wenbo
    Zhang, Xiaojing
    Ren, Zhiqiang
    Qin, Weimin
    Meng, Fan
    Li, Yuhong
    Fan, Guoxiang
    Yin, Ning
    [J]. DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2023, 17 : 1347 - 1356
  • [7] Patient-controlled sedation with propofol/remifentanil versus propofol/alfentanil for patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy, a randomized, controlled double-blind study
    Sultan, Sherif S.
    [J]. SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 8 (05) : S36 - S40
  • [8] The efficacy and safety of intrathecal dexmedetomidine for parturients undergoing cesarean section: a double-blind randomized controlled trial
    Xiao-xiao Li
    Yu-mei Li
    Xue-li Lv
    Xing-he Wang
    Su Liu
    [J]. BMC Anesthesiology, 20
  • [9] The efficacy and safety of intrathecal dexmedetomidine for parturients undergoing cesarean section: a double-blind randomized controlled trial
    Li, Xiao-xiao
    Li, Yu-mei
    Lv, Xue-li
    Wang, Xing-he
    Liu, Su
    [J]. BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [10] Safety and efficacy of etomidate and propofol anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing gastroscopy: A double-blind randomized clinical study
    Meng, Qing-Tao
    Cao, Chen
    Liu, Hui-Min
    Xia, Zhong-Yuan
    Li, Wei
    Tang, Ling-Hua
    Chen, Rong
    Jiang, Meng
    Wu, Yang
    Leng, Yan
    Lee, Chris C.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2016, 12 (03) : 1515 - 1524