Comparative efficacy and safety of ciprofol, propofol, and propofol and etomidate mixture, and ciprofol and etomidate mixture in patients undergoing painless gastroscopy: A randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Yanlong [1 ]
Qian, Yihong [1 ]
Zhang, Lilan [1 ]
Guo, Shanliang [1 ]
Fan, Longcheng [1 ]
Zhang, Mingsheng [1 ]
Liu, Zhongyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Prov Peoples Hosp, Affiliated Hosp 1, Nanchang Med Coll, Dept Anesthesiol, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
ciprofol; etomidate; gastroscopy; propofol;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000039585
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: To compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofol, propofol, propofol and etomidate mixture or ciprofol and etomidate mixture in patients undergoing painless gastroscopic anesthesia, and to explore the optimal plan to relieve the patient's discomfort. Methods: A total of 120 patients scheduled for painless gastroscopy were randomly assigned to 4 groups: propofol (Group P), ciprofol (Group C), propofol-etomidate mixture (Group P-E), and ciprofol-etomidate mixture (Group C-E). The success rate of gastroscopy examination, patient satisfaction, incidence of injection pain, hemodynamic parameters, induction time, procedure time, the consumption of drugs, awakening time, and incidence of adverse events were evaluated. Results: All patients in the study successfully completed the gastroscopy. The satisfaction of patients in Group C-E was significantly higher than that in Group P (P < .05), but there was no statistical significance in the patient satisfaction among the other groups. Compared with Group P, the incidence of injection pain in Groups C and C-E significantly decreased (P < .05). There were no significant differences in the SBP, diastolic blood pressure, HR, and SpO2 among the 4 groups (P > .05). The awakening time of Group C was significantly longer than that of Groups P and P-E (P < .05), but there was no statistically significant difference in the awakening time of other groups. Conclusion: Ciprofol demonstrated efficacy in inducing sedation or anesthesia during painless gastroscopy that was similar to propofol, while exhibiting a comparable safety profile. Moreover, the combination of propofol and etomidate, as well as the combination of ciprofol and etomidate, were both shown to be equally safe and effective for this clinical application. These findings suggest that ciprofol can be considered as a safe and effective alternative for painless gastroscopy, and the ciprofol-etomidate mixture may be a better choice.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol in patients undergoing painless hysteroscopy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
    Aijun Li
    Ning Li
    Lei Zhu
    Zige Xu
    Yifan Wang
    Junjie Li
    Gerong Zhang
    BMC Anesthesiology, 24 (1)
  • [2] The efficacy and safety of ciprofol and propofol in patients undergoing colonoscopy: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
    Gao, Shi-Hui
    Tang, Qian-Qian
    Wang, Chang-Ming
    Guan, Zhan-Ying
    Wang, Ling-Ling
    Zhang, Jing
    Yan, Zeng-Long
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2024, 95
  • [3] Safety and efficacy of etomidate and propofol anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing gastroscopy: A double-blind randomized clinical study
    Meng, Qing-Tao
    Cao, Chen
    Liu, Hui-Min
    Xia, Zhong-Yuan
    Li, Wei
    Tang, Ling-Hua
    Chen, Rong
    Jiang, Meng
    Wu, Yang
    Leng, Yan
    Lee, Chris C.
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2016, 12 (03) : 1515 - 1524
  • [4] Effect of propofol and ciprofol on the euphoric reaction in patients with painless gastroscopy: A prospective randomized controlled trial
    Li, Teng
    Zhang, Jin
    Liu, Zhouliang
    Lu, Yao
    Gong, Chuhao
    Han, Dan
    Wu, Ying
    Gao, Kailun
    Heng, Lei
    Wang, Liwei
    Peng, Peng
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (09)
  • [5] Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol Versus Propofol as Anesthetic for Patients Undergoing Painless Colonoscopy
    Ke Qiang He
    Ting Ting Huang
    Meng Yuan Tan
    Chen Gao
    Sheng Wang
    Pain and Therapy, 2024, 13 (6) : 1633 - 1644
  • [6] Ciprofol versus propofol for anesthesia induction in cardiac surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial
    Le Yu
    Xiang Liu
    Xiang Zhao
    Xiu Shan
    Evelyne Bischof
    Hui-hong Lu
    BMC Anesthesiology, 24 (1)
  • [7] Efficacy and Safety of a Subanesthetic Dose of Esketamine Combined with Propofol in Patients with Obesity Undergoing Painless Gastroscopy: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Zheng, Longbin
    Wang, Yiteng
    Ma, Qing
    Liang, Wenbo
    Zhang, Xiaojing
    Ren, Zhiqiang
    Qin, Weimin
    Meng, Fan
    Li, Yuhong
    Fan, Guoxiang
    Yin, Ning
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2023, 17 : 1347 - 1356
  • [8] A comparison of anesthetic regimens using etomidate and propofol in patients undergoing first-trimester abortions: double-blind, randomized clinical trial of safety and efficacy
    Wu, Jing
    Yao, Shanglong
    Wu, Zhouyang
    Wu, Zhiling
    Chu, Shujuan
    Xia, Geqing
    Deng, Feitao
    CONTRACEPTION, 2013, 87 (01) : 55 - 62
  • [9] The component analysis of propofol and etomidate mixture and its clinical efficacy
    Liao, Yong
    You, Yan
    Zhou, Xuejun
    Guo, Yang
    Tang, Zhipeng
    Wang, Qin
    Jian, Daolin
    2015 SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MEASURING TECHNOLOGY AND MECHATRONICS AUTOMATION (ICMTMA 2015), 2015, : 1152 - 1155
  • [10] Sedation with a 1:1 mixture of etomidate and propofol for gastroscopy in hypertensive elderly patients
    Liu, Yanpeng
    Huang, Yiping
    Wang, Ruoguo
    Zhai, Yongji
    Huang, Kechang
    Ren, Zhanjie
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2023, 25 (08): : 778 - 783