Comparative efficacy and safety of ciprofol, propofol, and propofol and etomidate mixture, and ciprofol and etomidate mixture in patients undergoing painless gastroscopy: A randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Yanlong [1 ]
Qian, Yihong [1 ]
Zhang, Lilan [1 ]
Guo, Shanliang [1 ]
Fan, Longcheng [1 ]
Zhang, Mingsheng [1 ]
Liu, Zhongyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Prov Peoples Hosp, Affiliated Hosp 1, Nanchang Med Coll, Dept Anesthesiol, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
ciprofol; etomidate; gastroscopy; propofol;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000039585
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: To compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofol, propofol, propofol and etomidate mixture or ciprofol and etomidate mixture in patients undergoing painless gastroscopic anesthesia, and to explore the optimal plan to relieve the patient's discomfort. Methods: A total of 120 patients scheduled for painless gastroscopy were randomly assigned to 4 groups: propofol (Group P), ciprofol (Group C), propofol-etomidate mixture (Group P-E), and ciprofol-etomidate mixture (Group C-E). The success rate of gastroscopy examination, patient satisfaction, incidence of injection pain, hemodynamic parameters, induction time, procedure time, the consumption of drugs, awakening time, and incidence of adverse events were evaluated. Results: All patients in the study successfully completed the gastroscopy. The satisfaction of patients in Group C-E was significantly higher than that in Group P (P < .05), but there was no statistical significance in the patient satisfaction among the other groups. Compared with Group P, the incidence of injection pain in Groups C and C-E significantly decreased (P < .05). There were no significant differences in the SBP, diastolic blood pressure, HR, and SpO2 among the 4 groups (P > .05). The awakening time of Group C was significantly longer than that of Groups P and P-E (P < .05), but there was no statistically significant difference in the awakening time of other groups. Conclusion: Ciprofol demonstrated efficacy in inducing sedation or anesthesia during painless gastroscopy that was similar to propofol, while exhibiting a comparable safety profile. Moreover, the combination of propofol and etomidate, as well as the combination of ciprofol and etomidate, were both shown to be equally safe and effective for this clinical application. These findings suggest that ciprofol can be considered as a safe and effective alternative for painless gastroscopy, and the ciprofol-etomidate mixture may be a better choice.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Etomidate vs propofol in coronary heart disease patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery:A randomized clinical trial
    Zhong-Liang Dai
    Xing-Tao Cai
    Wen-Li Gao
    Miao Lin
    Juan Lin
    Yuan-Xu Jiang
    Xin Jiang
    World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2021, 9 (06) : 1293 - 1303
  • [42] Etomidate vs propofol in coronary heart disease patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery: A randomized clinical trial
    Dai, Zhong-Liang
    Cai, Xing-Tao
    Gao, Wen-Li
    Lin, Miao
    Lin, Juan
    Jiang, Yuan-Xu
    Jiang, Xin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2021, 9 (06) : 1293 - 1303
  • [43] Efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate in patients with obesity undergoing painless colonoscopy: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial
    Deng, Lei
    Zhou, Rui
    Jiang, Wencai
    Zhai, Wenhu
    Chen, Xuemeng
    Xia, Leqiang
    Xiong, Chao
    Zhou, Yukai
    Zhang, Xianjie
    Peng, Yanhua
    SIGNA VITAE, 2024, 20 (07) : 76 - 85
  • [44] Study on the effectiveness and safety of ciprofol in anesthesia in gynecological day surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled study
    Man, Yan
    Xiao, Hongyi
    Zhu, Teng
    Ji, Fanceng
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [45] A comparative study on the efficacy and safety of propofol combined with different doses of alfentanil in gastroscopy: a randomized controlled trial
    Ling-Ling Wang
    Zhan-Ying Guan
    Chang-Ming Wang
    Yi-Wen Zhang
    Jing Zhang
    Ping Zhao
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2023, 37 : 201 - 209
  • [46] A comparative study on the efficacy and safety of propofol combined with different doses of alfentanil in gastroscopy: a randomized controlled trial
    Wang, Ling-Ling
    Guan, Zhan-Ying
    Wang, Chang-Ming
    Zhang, Yi-Wen
    Zhang, Jing
    Zhao, Ping
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2023, 37 (02) : 201 - 209
  • [47] Effect of different doses of esketamine compared with fentanyl combined with propofol on hypotension in patients undergoing painless abortion surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial
    Jiejuan Chen
    Xiaohua Zou
    Bailong Hu
    Yang Yang
    Feng Wang
    Qian Zhou
    Minhuan Shen
    BMC Anesthesiology, 22
  • [48] Effect of different doses of esketamine compared with fentanyl combined with propofol on hypotension in patients undergoing painless abortion surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial
    Chen, Jiejuan
    Zou, Xiaohua
    Hu, Bailong
    Yang, Yang
    Wang, Feng
    Zhou, Qian
    Shen, Minhuan
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [49] Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol Sedation in ICU Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation: A Multicenter, Single-Blind, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial
    Liu, Yongjun
    Peng, Zhiyong
    Liu, Songqiao
    Yu, Xiangyou
    Zhu, Duming
    Zhang, Linlin
    Wen, Jianli
    An, Youzhong
    Zhan, Liying
    Wang, Xiaochuang
    Kang, Yan
    Pan, Aijun
    Yan, Jing
    Zhang, Lina
    Liu, Fengming
    Zeng, Jun
    Lin, Qinhan
    Sun, Renhua
    Yu, Jiangquan
    Wang, Huaxue
    Yao, Li
    Chen, Chuanxi
    Liu, Ning
    Nie, Yao
    Lyu, Jie
    Wu, Kun
    Wu, Jianfeng
    Liu, Xiao
    Guan, Xiangdong
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (10) : 1318 - 1327
  • [50] Study on the effectiveness and safety of ciprofol in anesthesia in gynecological day surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled study
    Yan Man
    Hongyi Xiao
    Teng Zhu
    Fanceng Ji
    BMC Anesthesiology, 23