Automated liver magnetic resonance elastography quality control and liver stiffness measurement using deep learning

被引:0
|
作者
Ozkaya, Efe [1 ,2 ]
Nieves-Vazquez, Heriberto A. [3 ]
Yuce, Murat [1 ,2 ]
Yasokawa, Kazuya [1 ,2 ]
Altinmakas, Emre [1 ,2 ]
Ueda, Jun [4 ]
Taouli, Bachir [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Biomed Engn & Imaging Inst, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Diagnost Mol & Intervent Radiol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Georgia Inst Technol, Dept Biomed Engn, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Mech Engn, Atlanta, GA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Magnetic resonance elastography; Deep learning; Quality control; MR ELASTOGRAPHY; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-025-04883-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeMagnetic resonance elastography (MRE) measures liver stiffness for fibrosis staging, but its utility can be hindered by quality control (QC) challenges and measurement variability. The objective of the study was to fully automate liver MRE QC and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using a deep learning (DL) method.MethodsIn this retrospective, single center, IRB-approved human study, a curated dataset involved 897 MRE magnitude slices from 146 2D MRE scans [1.5 T and 3 T MRI, 2D Gradient Echo (GRE), and 2D Spin Echo-Echo Planar Imaging (SE-EPI)] of 69 patients (37 males, mean age 51.6 years). A SqueezeNet-based binary QC model was trained using combined and individual inputs of MRE magnitude slices and their 2D Fast-Fourier transforms to detect artifacts from patient motion, aliasing, and blurring. Three independent observers labeled MRE magnitude images as 0 (non-diagnostic quality) or 1 (diagnostic quality) to create a reference standard. A 2D U-Net segmentation model was trained on diagnostic slices with liver masks to support LSM. Intersection over union between the predicted segmentation and confidence masks identified measurable areas for LSM on elastograms. Cohen's unweighted Kappa coefficient, mean LSM error (%), and intra-class correlation coefficient were calculated to compare the DL-assisted approach with the observers' annotations. An efficiency analysis compared the DL-assisted vs manual LSM durations.ResultsThe top QC ensemble model (using MRE magnitude alone) achieved accuracy, precision, and recall of 0.958, 0.982, and 0.886, respectively. The mean LSM error between the DL-assisted approach and the reference standard was 1.9% +/- 4.6%. DL-assisted approach completed LSM for 29 diagnostic slices in under 1 s, compared to 20 min manually.ConclusionAn automated DL-based classification of liver MRE diagnostic quality, liver segmentation, and LSM approach demonstrates a promising high performance, with potential for clinical adoption.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Automated liver stiffness measurements with magnetic resonance elastography
    Dzyubak, Bogdan
    Glaser, Kevin
    Yin, Meng
    Talwalkar, Jayant
    Chen, Jun
    Manduca, Armando
    Ehman, Richard L.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 38 (02) : 371 - 379
  • [2] Liver stiffness measurement by magnetic resonance elastography is not affected by hepatic steatosis
    Jie Chen
    Alina M. Allen
    Terry M. Therneau
    Jun Chen
    Jiahui Li
    Safa Hoodeshenas
    Jingbiao Chen
    Xin Lu
    Zheng Zhu
    Sudhakar K. Venkatesh
    Bin Song
    Richard L. Ehman
    Meng Yin
    European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 950 - 958
  • [3] Liver stiffness measurement by magnetic resonance elastography is not affected by hepatic steatosis
    Chen, Jie
    Allen, Alina M.
    Therneau, Terry M.
    Chen, Jun
    Li, Jiahui
    Hoodeshenas, Safa
    Chen, Jingbiao
    Lu, Xin
    Zhu, Zheng
    Venkatesh, Sudhakar K.
    Song, Bin
    Ehman, Richard L.
    Yin, Meng
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (02) : 950 - 958
  • [4] Change in serial liver stiffness measurement by magnetic resonance elastography and outcomes in NAFLD
    Gidener, Tolga
    Dierkhising, Ross A.
    Mara, Kristin C.
    Therneau, Terry M.
    Venkatesh, Sudhakar K.
    Ehman, Richard L.
    Yin, Meng
    Allen, Alina M.
    HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 77 (01) : 268 - 274
  • [5] Measurement of the liver stiffness with two imaging techniques: magnetic resonance elastography and Fibroscan
    Bensamoun, S.
    Wang, L.
    Robert, L.
    Charleux, F.
    Latrive, J. P.
    Tho, M. C. Ho Ba
    COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 11 : 31 - 32
  • [6] Inflammation activity affects liver stiffness measurement by magnetic resonance elastography in MASLD
    Wei, Xiaodie
    Qi, Shi
    Wei, Xinhuan
    Qiu, Lixia
    Du, Xiaofei
    Liu, Yali
    Xu, Hangfei
    Zhao, Jinhan
    Chen, Sitong
    Zhang, Jing
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2024, 56 (10) : 1715 - 1720
  • [7] LIVER STIFFNESS ON MAGNETIC RESONANCE ELASTOGRAPHY AND LIVER-RELATED OUTCOMES
    Ajmera, Veeral H.
    Nguyen, Khang
    Tamaki, Nobuharu
    Bettencourt, Ricki
    Loomba, Rohit
    HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 74 : 51A - 51A
  • [8] Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: Interobserver Agreement for Liver Stiffness Measurement with Manual and Automated Methods
    Hoodeshenas, Safa
    Welle, Christopher L.
    Navin, Patrick J.
    Dzyubak, Bogdan
    Eaton, John E.
    Ehman, Richard L.
    Venkatesh, Sudhakar K.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (12) : 1625 - 1632
  • [9] The role of magnetic resonance elastography in liver stiffness evaluation
    Mannelli, Lorenzo
    Monti, Serena
    Ogurtsov, Pavel
    POLISH ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE-POLSKIE ARCHIWUM MEDYCYNY WEWNETRZNEJ, 2019, 129 (05): : 301 - 302
  • [10] Deep Learning-Enabled Automated Quality Control for Liver MR Elastography: Initial Results
    Nieves-Vazquez, Heriberto A.
    Ozkaya, Efe
    Meinhold, Waiman
    Geahchan, Amine
    Bane, Octavia
    Ueda, Jun
    Taouli, Bachir
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2025, 61 (02) : 985 - 994