Automated liver magnetic resonance elastography quality control and liver stiffness measurement using deep learning

被引:0
|
作者
Ozkaya, Efe [1 ,2 ]
Nieves-Vazquez, Heriberto A. [3 ]
Yuce, Murat [1 ,2 ]
Yasokawa, Kazuya [1 ,2 ]
Altinmakas, Emre [1 ,2 ]
Ueda, Jun [4 ]
Taouli, Bachir [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Biomed Engn & Imaging Inst, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Diagnost Mol & Intervent Radiol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Georgia Inst Technol, Dept Biomed Engn, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Mech Engn, Atlanta, GA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Magnetic resonance elastography; Deep learning; Quality control; MR ELASTOGRAPHY; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-025-04883-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeMagnetic resonance elastography (MRE) measures liver stiffness for fibrosis staging, but its utility can be hindered by quality control (QC) challenges and measurement variability. The objective of the study was to fully automate liver MRE QC and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using a deep learning (DL) method.MethodsIn this retrospective, single center, IRB-approved human study, a curated dataset involved 897 MRE magnitude slices from 146 2D MRE scans [1.5 T and 3 T MRI, 2D Gradient Echo (GRE), and 2D Spin Echo-Echo Planar Imaging (SE-EPI)] of 69 patients (37 males, mean age 51.6 years). A SqueezeNet-based binary QC model was trained using combined and individual inputs of MRE magnitude slices and their 2D Fast-Fourier transforms to detect artifacts from patient motion, aliasing, and blurring. Three independent observers labeled MRE magnitude images as 0 (non-diagnostic quality) or 1 (diagnostic quality) to create a reference standard. A 2D U-Net segmentation model was trained on diagnostic slices with liver masks to support LSM. Intersection over union between the predicted segmentation and confidence masks identified measurable areas for LSM on elastograms. Cohen's unweighted Kappa coefficient, mean LSM error (%), and intra-class correlation coefficient were calculated to compare the DL-assisted approach with the observers' annotations. An efficiency analysis compared the DL-assisted vs manual LSM durations.ResultsThe top QC ensemble model (using MRE magnitude alone) achieved accuracy, precision, and recall of 0.958, 0.982, and 0.886, respectively. The mean LSM error between the DL-assisted approach and the reference standard was 1.9% +/- 4.6%. DL-assisted approach completed LSM for 29 diagnostic slices in under 1 s, compared to 20 min manually.ConclusionAn automated DL-based classification of liver MRE diagnostic quality, liver segmentation, and LSM approach demonstrates a promising high performance, with potential for clinical adoption.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Liver stiffness measurement using transient elastography and hepatocellular carcinoma
    Nakao, Haruhisa
    Yoneda, Masashi
    HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH, 2011, 41 (10) : 921 - 924
  • [32] Influence of Intravenous Gadolinium on Estimation of Liver Stiffness with Magnetic Resonance Elastography for Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis
    Venkatesh, S.
    Teo, L.
    Ang, B.
    Lim, S.
    Wee, A.
    Ehman, R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (05)
  • [33] Stable Automated Segmentation of Liver MR Elastography Images for Clinical Stiffness Measurement
    Dzyubak, Bogdan
    Venkatesh, Sudhakar K.
    Glaser, Kevin
    Yin, Meng
    Talwalkar, Jayant
    Chen, Jun
    Manduca, Armando
    Ehman, Richard L.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2013: BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS IN MOLECULAR, STRUCTURAL, AND FUNCTIONAL IMAGING, 2013, 8672
  • [34] Comparison of the liver stiffness measurement by transient elastography with the liver biopsy
    Ioan Sporea
    Roxana ■irli
    Alexandra Deleanu
    Adriana Tudora
    Manuela Curescu
    Marioara Cornianu
    Daniela Lazǎr
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2008, (42) : 6513 - 6517
  • [35] Comparison of the liver stiffness measurement by transient elastography with the liver biopsy
    Sporea, Ioan
    Sirli, Roxana
    Deleanu, Alexandra
    Tudora, Adriana
    Curescu, Manuela
    Cornianu, Marioara
    Lazar, Daniela
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 14 (42) : 6513 - 6517
  • [36] Liver stiffness measurement by magnetic resonance elastography is not associated with developing hepatocellular carcinoma in subjects with compensated cirrhosis
    Anaparthy, R.
    Talwalkar, J. A.
    Yin, M.
    Roberts, L. R.
    Fidler, J. L.
    Ehman, R. L.
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2011, 34 (01) : 83 - 91
  • [37] Exploring the impact of excluding intrahepatic segmental vessels on liver stiffness measurement and advanced fibrosis diagnosis using magnetic resonance elastography
    Kim, Wook
    Hwang, Jeong Ah
    Min, Ji Hye
    Lee, Sunyoung
    Lee, Ji Eun
    Shin, Jaeseung
    Jeong, Woo Kyoung
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2024, 65 (09) : 1021 - 1029
  • [38] Predictive Value of Liver Stiffness Measurement by Magnetic Resonance Elastography for Complications after Liver Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liang, Jiaxu
    Qiu, Bo
    Yin, Suo
    Chen, Yong
    Zhang, Sijia
    DIGESTION, 2022, 103 (05) : 357 - 366
  • [39] Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Liver in Children and Adolescents: Assessment of Regional Variations in Stiffness
    Krishnamurthy, Ramkumar
    Thompson, Benjamin L.
    Shankar, Anand
    Gariepy, Cheryl E.
    Potter, Carol J.
    Fung, Bonita R.
    Hu, Houchun H.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2020, 27 (05) : E109 - E115
  • [40] Spleen stiffness in a healthy pediatric population undergoing liver magnetic resonance elastography
    Serai, Suraj D.
    Glenn, Alexandra
    Trout, Andrew T.
    Lerebo, Wondwossen T.
    Gee, Michael S.
    Khanna, Geetika
    Anupindi, Sudha A.
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2025, : 846 - 856