Efficient Positioning of QTL and Secondary Limit Thresholds in a Clinical Trial Risk-Based Monitoring

被引:0
|
作者
Shnaydman, Vladimir [1 ]
机构
[1] ORBee Consulting, 57 East Bluff Rd, Ashland, MA 01721 USA
关键词
Risk planning; Contingency budget; Optimization; Risk mitigation; RBM; RBQM; Strategy; Mitigation cost; Probability of occurrence; Impact; Risk score; Simulation; QTL; KRI; Secondary limit;
D O I
10.1007/s43441-024-00722-6
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
In the high-stakes world of clinical trials, where a company's multimillion-dollar drug development investment is at risk, the increasing complexity of these trials only compounds the challenges. Therefore, the development of a robust risk mitigation strategy, as a crucial component of comprehensive risk planning, is not just important but essential for effective drug development, particularly in the RBQM (Risk-Based Quality Management) ecosystem and its component-RBM (Risk-Based Monitoring). This emphasis on the urgency and significance of risk mitigation strategy can help the audience understand the gravity of the topic. The paper introduces a novel modeling framework for deriving an efficient risk mitigation strategy at the planning stage of a clinical trial and establishing operational rules (thresholds) under the assumption that contingency resources are limited. The problem is solved in two steps: (1) Deriving a contingency budget and its efficient allocation across risks to be mitigated and (2) Deriving operational rules to be aligned with risk assessment and contingency resources. This approach is based on combining optimization and simulation models. The optimization model aims to derive an efficient contingency budget and allocate limited mitigation resources across mitigated risks. The simulation model aims to efficiently position each risk's QTL/KRI (Quality Tolerance Limits/Key Risk Indicators at a clinical trial level) and Secondary Limit thresholds. A case study illustrates the proposed technique's practical application and effectiveness. This example demonstrates the framework's potential and instills confidence in its successful implementation, reassuring the audience of its practicality and usefulness. The paper is structured as follows. (1) Introduction; (2) Methodology; (3) Models-Risk Optimizer and Risk Simulator; (4) Case study; (5) Discussion and (6) Conclusion.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 183
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A model for risk-based monitoring of contaminants in feed ingredients
    van der Fels-Klerx, H. J.
    Adamse, P.
    de Jong, J.
    Hoogenboom, R.
    de Nijs, M.
    Bikker, P.
    FOOD CONTROL, 2017, 72 : 211 - 218
  • [42] Risk-Based Quality Management: A Case for Centralized Monitoring
    Stansbury, Nicole
    Branco, Danilo
    Mcdavid, Cris
    Stewart, Jennifer
    Surdam, Kristin
    Olson, Nycole
    Perry, Joanne
    Liska, Jeremy
    Phillips, Linda
    Coogan, Amanda
    Adelfio, Anina
    Garson, Lauren
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2025, 59 (02) : 199 - 210
  • [43] Risk-based monitoring of udder health. A review
    Zoche, V.
    Heuwieser, W.
    Kroemker, V.
    TIERAERZTLICHE PRAXIS AUSGABE GROSSTIERE NUTZTIERE, 2011, 39 (02): : 88 - 94
  • [44] Risk-Based Data Monitoring: Quality Control in Central Nervous System (CNS) Clinical Trials
    Cynthia McNamara
    Nina Engelhardt
    William Potter
    Christian Yavorsky
    Matthew Masotti
    Guillermo Di Clemente
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2019, 53 : 176 - 182
  • [45] Risk-based centralized data monitoring of clinical trials at the time of COVID-19 pandemic
    Afroz, Most Alina
    Schwarber, Grant
    Bhuiyan, Mohammad Alfrad Nobel
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2021, 104
  • [46] Risk-Based Thresholds for Hemodialysis Ultrafiltration Rates A Warning Signal or a Call to Action?
    Canney, Mark
    Clark, Edward G.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2023, 18 (06): : 693 - 695
  • [47] Risk-Based Data Monitoring: Quality Control in Central Nervous System (CNS) Clinical Trials
    McNamara, Cynthia
    Engelhardt, Nina
    Potter, William
    Yavorsky, Christian
    Masotti, Matthew
    Di Clemente, Guillermo
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2019, 53 (02) : 176 - 182
  • [48] Extended Risk-Based Monitoring Model, On-Demand Query-Driven Source Data Verification, and Their Economic Impact on Clinical Trial Operations
    Vadim Tantsyura
    Imogene McCanless Dunn
    Joel Waters
    Kaye Fendt
    Yong Joong Kim
    Deborah Viola
    Jules Mitchel
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2016, 50 : 115 - 122
  • [49] Extended Risk-Based Monitoring Model, On-Demand Query-Driven Source Data Verification, and Their Economic Impact on Clinical Trial Operations
    Tantsyura, Vadim
    Dunn, Imogene McCanless
    Waters, Joel
    Fendt, Kaye
    Kim, Yong Joong
    Viola, Deborah
    Mitchel, Jules
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2016, 50 (01) : 115 - 122
  • [50] A Risk-Based Approach to Improving Disaster Relief Asset Pre-Positioning
    Arnette, Andrew N.
    Zobel, Christopher W.
    PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2019, 28 (02) : 457 - 478