Efficient Positioning of QTL and Secondary Limit Thresholds in a Clinical Trial Risk-Based Monitoring

被引:0
|
作者
Shnaydman, Vladimir [1 ]
机构
[1] ORBee Consulting, 57 East Bluff Rd, Ashland, MA 01721 USA
关键词
Risk planning; Contingency budget; Optimization; Risk mitigation; RBM; RBQM; Strategy; Mitigation cost; Probability of occurrence; Impact; Risk score; Simulation; QTL; KRI; Secondary limit;
D O I
10.1007/s43441-024-00722-6
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
In the high-stakes world of clinical trials, where a company's multimillion-dollar drug development investment is at risk, the increasing complexity of these trials only compounds the challenges. Therefore, the development of a robust risk mitigation strategy, as a crucial component of comprehensive risk planning, is not just important but essential for effective drug development, particularly in the RBQM (Risk-Based Quality Management) ecosystem and its component-RBM (Risk-Based Monitoring). This emphasis on the urgency and significance of risk mitigation strategy can help the audience understand the gravity of the topic. The paper introduces a novel modeling framework for deriving an efficient risk mitigation strategy at the planning stage of a clinical trial and establishing operational rules (thresholds) under the assumption that contingency resources are limited. The problem is solved in two steps: (1) Deriving a contingency budget and its efficient allocation across risks to be mitigated and (2) Deriving operational rules to be aligned with risk assessment and contingency resources. This approach is based on combining optimization and simulation models. The optimization model aims to derive an efficient contingency budget and allocate limited mitigation resources across mitigated risks. The simulation model aims to efficiently position each risk's QTL/KRI (Quality Tolerance Limits/Key Risk Indicators at a clinical trial level) and Secondary Limit thresholds. A case study illustrates the proposed technique's practical application and effectiveness. This example demonstrates the framework's potential and instills confidence in its successful implementation, reassuring the audience of its practicality and usefulness. The paper is structured as follows. (1) Introduction; (2) Methodology; (3) Models-Risk Optimizer and Risk Simulator; (4) Case study; (5) Discussion and (6) Conclusion.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 183
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An evaluation of risk-based monitoring in pragmatic trials in UK Clinical Trials Units
    Daniel Beever
    Lizzie Swaby
    Trials, 20
  • [22] An evaluation of risk-based monitoring in pragmatic trials in UK Clinical Trials Units
    Beever, Daniel
    Swaby, Lizzie
    TRIALS, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [23] A risk-based microbiological criterion that uses the relative risk as the critical limit
    Andersen, Jens Kirk
    Norrung, Birgit
    Alves Machado, Simone da Costa
    Nauta, Maarten
    FOOD CONTROL, 2015, 58 : 29 - 32
  • [24] Key Considerations in the Transition to Risk-Based Monitoring
    Rosenberg, Michael J.
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2014, 48 (04) : 428 - 435
  • [25] Key Considerations in the Transition to Risk-Based Monitoring
    Michael J. Rosenberg
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2014, 48 : 428 - 435
  • [26] Structural health monitoring - a risk-based approach
    Colford, Barry R.
    Zhou, Ed
    Pape, Torill
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2022, 177 (02) : 89 - 98
  • [27] MIL AND MIRO DIAGRAMS FOR RISK-BASED POSITIONING OF DRILLING RIGS WITH DYNAMIC POSITIONING SYSTEM
    Maturana, Marcos Coelho
    Souza, Victor Rafael
    Mesa, Valentina Clavijo
    Martins, Marcelo Ramos
    Oshiro, Anderson Takehiro
    Schleder, Adriana Miralles
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 39TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, OMAE2020, VOL 2A, 2020,
  • [28] Evaluation of risk-based colposcopy in the ALTS trial
    Liu, Angela H.
    Schiffman, Mark
    Gage, Julia C.
    Castle, Philip E.
    Wentzensen, Nicolas
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [29] An optimization framework to guide the choice of thresholds for risk-based cancer screening
    Brentnall, Adam R.
    Atakpa, Emma C.
    Hill, Harry
    Santeramo, Ruggiero
    Damiani, Celeste
    Cuzick, Jack
    Montana, Giovanni
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2023, 6 (01)
  • [30] NOVEL RISK-BASED THRESHOLDS FOR BONE MINERAL BIOMARKERS IN ADVANCED CKD
    Canney, Mark
    Djurdjev, Ognjenka
    Tang, Mila
    Zierold, Claudia
    Blocki, Frank
    Bonelli, Fabrizio
    Wolf, Myles
    Levin, Adeera
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 33 : 160 - 160