Efficient Positioning of QTL and Secondary Limit Thresholds in a Clinical Trial Risk-Based Monitoring

被引:0
|
作者
Shnaydman, Vladimir [1 ]
机构
[1] ORBee Consulting, 57 East Bluff Rd, Ashland, MA 01721 USA
关键词
Risk planning; Contingency budget; Optimization; Risk mitigation; RBM; RBQM; Strategy; Mitigation cost; Probability of occurrence; Impact; Risk score; Simulation; QTL; KRI; Secondary limit;
D O I
10.1007/s43441-024-00722-6
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
In the high-stakes world of clinical trials, where a company's multimillion-dollar drug development investment is at risk, the increasing complexity of these trials only compounds the challenges. Therefore, the development of a robust risk mitigation strategy, as a crucial component of comprehensive risk planning, is not just important but essential for effective drug development, particularly in the RBQM (Risk-Based Quality Management) ecosystem and its component-RBM (Risk-Based Monitoring). This emphasis on the urgency and significance of risk mitigation strategy can help the audience understand the gravity of the topic. The paper introduces a novel modeling framework for deriving an efficient risk mitigation strategy at the planning stage of a clinical trial and establishing operational rules (thresholds) under the assumption that contingency resources are limited. The problem is solved in two steps: (1) Deriving a contingency budget and its efficient allocation across risks to be mitigated and (2) Deriving operational rules to be aligned with risk assessment and contingency resources. This approach is based on combining optimization and simulation models. The optimization model aims to derive an efficient contingency budget and allocate limited mitigation resources across mitigated risks. The simulation model aims to efficiently position each risk's QTL/KRI (Quality Tolerance Limits/Key Risk Indicators at a clinical trial level) and Secondary Limit thresholds. A case study illustrates the proposed technique's practical application and effectiveness. This example demonstrates the framework's potential and instills confidence in its successful implementation, reassuring the audience of its practicality and usefulness. The paper is structured as follows. (1) Introduction; (2) Methodology; (3) Models-Risk Optimizer and Risk Simulator; (4) Case study; (5) Discussion and (6) Conclusion.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 183
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An optimization framework to guide the choice of thresholds for risk-based cancer screening
    Adam R. Brentnall
    Emma C. Atakpa
    Harry Hill
    Ruggiero Santeramo
    Celeste Damiani
    Jack Cuzick
    Giovanni Montana
    Stephen W. Duffy
    npj Digital Medicine, 6
  • [32] Risk-based secondary prevention of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome
    Ruffatti, A.
    Calligaro, A.
    Del Ross, T.
    Favaro, M.
    Tonello, M.
    Banzato, A.
    Punzi, L.
    Pengo, V.
    LUPUS, 2012, 21 (07) : 741 - 743
  • [33] Assessing the impact of risk-based data monitoring on outcomes for a paediatric multicentre randomised controlled trial
    Le Marsney, Renate
    Johnson, Kerry
    Flores, Jenipher Chumbes
    Coetzer, Shelley
    Darvas, Jennifer
    Delzoppo, Carmel
    Jolly, Arielle
    Masterson, Kate
    Sherring, Claire
    Thomson, Hannah
    Ergetu, Endrias
    Gilholm, Patricia
    Gibbons, Kristen S.
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2024, 21 (04) : 461 - 469
  • [34] Evaluation of Data Errors and Monitoring Activities in a Trial in Japan Using a Risk-Based Approach Including Central Monitoring and Site Risk Assessment
    Hidenobu Kondo
    Tomoaki Kamiyoshihara
    Kenji Fujisawa
    Toshiaki Nojima
    Ryohei Tanigawa
    Hisataka Fujiwara
    Hideki Suganami
    Yukikazu Hayashi
    Takuhiro Yamaguchi
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2021, 55 : 841 - 849
  • [35] Evaluation of Data Errors and Monitoring Activities in a Trial in Japan Using a Risk-Based Approach Including Central Monitoring and Site Risk Assessment
    Kondo, Hidenobu
    Kamiyoshihara, Tomoaki
    Fujisawa, Kenji
    Nojima, Toshiaki
    Tanigawa, Ryohei
    Fujiwara, Hisataka
    Suganami, Hideki
    Hayashi, Yukikazu
    Yamaguchi, Takuhiro
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2021, 55 (04) : 841 - 849
  • [36] A risk-based monitoring approach to source data monitoring and documenting monitoring findings
    Brulotte, Maryse
    Alvey, Jessica S.
    Casper, T. Charles
    Cook, Lawrence J.
    Dwyer, Jamie P.
    VanBuren, John M.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2024, 143
  • [37] Technology Considerations to Enable the Risk-Based Monitoring Methodology
    Barnes, Shelly
    Katta, Nareen
    Sanford, Neil
    Staigers, Thomas
    Verish, Thomas
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2014, 48 (05) : 536 - 545
  • [38] On risk-based active learning for structural health monitoring
    Hughes, A. J.
    Bull, L. A.
    Gardner, P.
    Barthorpe, R. J.
    Dervilis, N.
    Worden, K.
    MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2022, 167
  • [39] Active surveillance: a review of risk-based, dynamic monitoring
    Nieboer, Daan
    Tomer, Anirudh
    Rizopoulos, Dimitris
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2018, 7 (01) : 106 - 115
  • [40] Technology Considerations to Enable the Risk-Based Monitoring Methodology
    Shelly Barnes
    Nareen Katta
    Neil Sanford
    Thomas Staigers
    Thomas Verish
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2014, 48 : 536 - 545