Efficient Positioning of QTL and Secondary Limit Thresholds in a Clinical Trial Risk-Based Monitoring

被引:0
|
作者
Shnaydman, Vladimir [1 ]
机构
[1] ORBee Consulting, 57 East Bluff Rd, Ashland, MA 01721 USA
关键词
Risk planning; Contingency budget; Optimization; Risk mitigation; RBM; RBQM; Strategy; Mitigation cost; Probability of occurrence; Impact; Risk score; Simulation; QTL; KRI; Secondary limit;
D O I
10.1007/s43441-024-00722-6
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
In the high-stakes world of clinical trials, where a company's multimillion-dollar drug development investment is at risk, the increasing complexity of these trials only compounds the challenges. Therefore, the development of a robust risk mitigation strategy, as a crucial component of comprehensive risk planning, is not just important but essential for effective drug development, particularly in the RBQM (Risk-Based Quality Management) ecosystem and its component-RBM (Risk-Based Monitoring). This emphasis on the urgency and significance of risk mitigation strategy can help the audience understand the gravity of the topic. The paper introduces a novel modeling framework for deriving an efficient risk mitigation strategy at the planning stage of a clinical trial and establishing operational rules (thresholds) under the assumption that contingency resources are limited. The problem is solved in two steps: (1) Deriving a contingency budget and its efficient allocation across risks to be mitigated and (2) Deriving operational rules to be aligned with risk assessment and contingency resources. This approach is based on combining optimization and simulation models. The optimization model aims to derive an efficient contingency budget and allocate limited mitigation resources across mitigated risks. The simulation model aims to efficiently position each risk's QTL/KRI (Quality Tolerance Limits/Key Risk Indicators at a clinical trial level) and Secondary Limit thresholds. A case study illustrates the proposed technique's practical application and effectiveness. This example demonstrates the framework's potential and instills confidence in its successful implementation, reassuring the audience of its practicality and usefulness. The paper is structured as follows. (1) Introduction; (2) Methodology; (3) Models-Risk Optimizer and Risk Simulator; (4) Case study; (5) Discussion and (6) Conclusion.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 183
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical Trial Monitoring: An Overview of Risk-based Approach
    Verma, Vishakha
    Mishra, Ashutosh
    Gowrav, M. P.
    Nischitha, M. S.
    JOURNAL OF YOUNG PHARMACISTS, 2023, 15 (02) : 239 - 244
  • [2] Rethinking the Clinically Based Thresholds of TransCelerate BioPharma for Risk-Based Monitoring
    Zink, Richard C.
    Dmitrienko, Anastasia
    Dmitrienko, Alex
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2018, 52 (05) : 560 - 571
  • [3] Rethinking the Clinically Based Thresholds of TransCelerate BioPharma for Risk-Based Monitoring
    Richard C. Zink
    Anastasia Dmitrienko
    Alex Dmitrienko
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2018, 52 : 560 - 571
  • [4] Risk-based Monitoring of Clinical Trials: An Integrative Approach
    Agrafiotis, Dimitris K.
    Lobanov, Victor S.
    Farnum, Michael A.
    Yang, Eric
    Ciervo, Joseph
    Walega, Michael
    Baumgart, Adam
    Mackey, Aaron J.
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2018, 40 (07) : 1204 - 1212
  • [5] Risk-Based Monitoring in Clinical Trials: 2021 Update
    Amy Adams
    Anina Adelfio
    Brian Barnes
    Ruth Berlien
    Danilo Branco
    Amanda Coogan
    Lauren Garson
    Nycole Ramirez
    Nicole Stansbury
    Jennifer Stewart
    Gillian Worman
    Paula Jo Butler
    Debby Brown
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2023, 57 : 529 - 537
  • [6] Risk-Based Monitoring in Clinical Trials: 2021 Update
    Adams, Amy
    Adelfio, Anina
    Barnes, Brian
    Berlien, Ruth
    Branco, Danilo
    Coogan, Amanda
    Garson, Lauren
    Ramirez, Nycole
    Stansbury, Nicole
    Stewart, Jennifer
    Worman, Gillian
    Butler, Paula Jo
    Brown, Debby
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2023, 57 (03) : 529 - 537
  • [7] Clinical trial monitoring effectiveness: Remote risk-based monitoring versus on-site monitoring with 100% source data verification
    Yamada, Osamu
    Chiu, Shih-Wei
    Takata, Munenori
    Abe, Michiaki
    Shoji, Mutsumi
    Kyotani, Eri
    Endo, Chiyo
    Shimada, Minami
    Tamura, Yuko
    Yamaguchi, Takuhiro
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2021, 18 (02) : 158 - 167
  • [8] Risk-Based Monitoring in Clinical Trials: Past, Present, and Future
    Brian Barnes
    Nicole Stansbury
    Debby Brown
    Lauren Garson
    Geoff Gerard
    Nickolas Piccoli
    Debra Jendrasek
    Nick May
    Vanesa Castillo
    Anina Adelfio
    Nycole Ramirez
    Andrea McSweeney
    Ruth Berlien
    Paula Jo Butler
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2021, 55 : 899 - 906
  • [9] Clinical Research Coordinators' Attitude Toward Risk-Based Monitoring
    Jeong, Ihn Sook
    Jeong, Jeong Hee
    Hwang, Youn Sun
    Youn, Ji Hyang
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2019, 53 (05) : 691 - 695
  • [10] Risk-Based Monitoring in Clinical Trials: Past, Present, and Future
    Barnes, Brian
    Stansbury, Nicole
    Brown, Debby
    Garson, Lauren
    Gerard, Geoff
    Piccoli, Nickolas
    Jendrasek, Debra
    May, Nick
    Castillo, Vanesa
    Adelfio, Anina
    Ramirez, Nycole
    McSweeney, Andrea
    Berlien, Ruth
    Butler, Paula Jo
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2021, 55 (04) : 899 - 906