Assessing and mitigating environmental impacts of construction materials: Insights from environmental product declarations

被引:0
|
作者
Yu, Zhonghan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Nurdiawati, Anissa [1 ,2 ]
Kanwal, Qudsia [1 ,2 ]
Al-Humaiqani, Mohammed M. [1 ,2 ]
Al-Ghamdi, Sami G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Environmental Science and Engineering Program, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal,23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
[2] KAUST Climate and Livability Initiative, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal,23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
[3] School of Ecology and Environment, Renmin University of China, Beijing,100872, China
来源
关键词
Carbon capture and storage - Carbon capture and utilization - Carbon sequestration - Direct air capture - Zero-carbon;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110929
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Construction activities significantly impact natural resources and the environment, accounting for 40 % of global energy consumption and 36 % of carbon emissions. This study evaluates the environmental impacts of various primary construction materials by leveraging more original and comprehensive Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) and incorporates insights from prevvious research to summarize effective mitigation strategies. Analyzing the environmental impact per unit mass is a critical step toward building-level assessments, enabling the strategic replacement of high-pollution materials with lower-impact alternatives to optimize environmental outcomes. The quantitative analysis of data from 180 EPDs indicates that aluminum and steel have the highest median total environmental impacts per unit mass, followed by plastics, while wood, cement, and concrete have relatively lower impacts. Overall, Abiotic Depletion Potential (ADP) and Global Warming Potential (GWP) are identified as the primary environmental impacts of construction materials. At the building level, the environmental footprint varies based on the quantity of each material used, leading to substantial overall impacts. Furthermore, this study explores the relationships between different environmental impacts, finding positive correlations between GWP and Primary Energy Non-Renewable Energy (PENRE), Acidification Potential (AP), and Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP). A comprehensive literature review identifies the key environmental hotspots and mitigation strategies for high-impact materials such as aluminum, steel, cement, and concrete. Common strategies include innovative production methods, waste recycling, carbon capture and storage (CCS), and the development of low-carbon materials. By integrating quantitative EPDs analysis with a qualitative literature review, this research provides a holistic understanding of the environmental burdens of construction materials, offering a valuable framework for developing sustainable policies and practices within the construction industry. © 2024 The Authors
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessing impacts of environmental contaminants
    O'Hara, TM
    O'Shea, TJ
    MARINE MAMMAL RESEARCH: CONSERVATION BEYOND CRISIS, 2005, : 63 - 83
  • [42] Environmental Management in a Kennel: survey of environmental impacts and proposition of mitigating measures
    Brito, Carolainy Silva
    Reis, Eduarda Oliveira
    REVISTA AGROGEOAMBIENTAL, 2021, 13 (03) : 595 - 605
  • [43] ASSESSING AND MITIGATING STUDIES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS OF 2011 WINTER UNIVERSIADE IN ERZURUM, TURKEY
    Eren, Zeynep
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOSYSTEMS AND ECOLOGY SCIENCE-IJEES, 2018, 8 (03): : 497 - 502
  • [44] The path to zero impacts: environmental building declarations based on LCA
    Killpack, R. Keith
    Burgoyne, Daniel E.
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION: CIVIL ENGINEERING AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 86 : 231 - 238
  • [45] Environmental Product Declaration (EPD): Visualization of environmental impacts
    S T E L L M A C H E R D.O.M.I.N.I.K.
    M E I N S-B E C K E R A.N.I.C.A.
    Bauingenieur, 2024, 99 (04): : A26 - A30
  • [46] Perceptions of governments towards mitigating the environmental impacts of expressway construction projects: A case of China
    Wu, Liu
    Ye, Kunhui
    Gong, Pan
    Xing, Jinding
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 236
  • [47] Stepwise environmental product declarations: ten SME case studies
    Zackrisson, Mats
    Rocha, Cristina
    Christiansen, Kim
    Jarnehammar, Anna
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2008, 16 (17) : 1872 - 1886
  • [48] PCR for Powder Coatings Allows Verifiable Environmental Product Declarations
    Darling, David
    COATINGSTECH, 2020, 17 (09): : 16 - 16
  • [49] LCA studies of food products as background for environmental product declarations
    Schau, Erwin Meissner
    Fet, Annik Magerholin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2008, 13 (03): : 255 - 264
  • [50] LCA studies of food products as background for environmental product declarations
    Erwin Meissner Schau
    Annik Magerholm Fet
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2008, 13 : 255 - 264