Assessing and mitigating environmental impacts of construction materials: Insights from environmental product declarations

被引:0
|
作者
Yu, Zhonghan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Nurdiawati, Anissa [1 ,2 ]
Kanwal, Qudsia [1 ,2 ]
Al-Humaiqani, Mohammed M. [1 ,2 ]
Al-Ghamdi, Sami G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Environmental Science and Engineering Program, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal,23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
[2] KAUST Climate and Livability Initiative, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal,23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
[3] School of Ecology and Environment, Renmin University of China, Beijing,100872, China
来源
关键词
Carbon capture and storage - Carbon capture and utilization - Carbon sequestration - Direct air capture - Zero-carbon;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110929
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Construction activities significantly impact natural resources and the environment, accounting for 40 % of global energy consumption and 36 % of carbon emissions. This study evaluates the environmental impacts of various primary construction materials by leveraging more original and comprehensive Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) and incorporates insights from prevvious research to summarize effective mitigation strategies. Analyzing the environmental impact per unit mass is a critical step toward building-level assessments, enabling the strategic replacement of high-pollution materials with lower-impact alternatives to optimize environmental outcomes. The quantitative analysis of data from 180 EPDs indicates that aluminum and steel have the highest median total environmental impacts per unit mass, followed by plastics, while wood, cement, and concrete have relatively lower impacts. Overall, Abiotic Depletion Potential (ADP) and Global Warming Potential (GWP) are identified as the primary environmental impacts of construction materials. At the building level, the environmental footprint varies based on the quantity of each material used, leading to substantial overall impacts. Furthermore, this study explores the relationships between different environmental impacts, finding positive correlations between GWP and Primary Energy Non-Renewable Energy (PENRE), Acidification Potential (AP), and Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP). A comprehensive literature review identifies the key environmental hotspots and mitigation strategies for high-impact materials such as aluminum, steel, cement, and concrete. Common strategies include innovative production methods, waste recycling, carbon capture and storage (CCS), and the development of low-carbon materials. By integrating quantitative EPDs analysis with a qualitative literature review, this research provides a holistic understanding of the environmental burdens of construction materials, offering a valuable framework for developing sustainable policies and practices within the construction industry. © 2024 The Authors
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Application of Environmental Product Declarations in Sustainability of Geotechnical Structures
    Tehrani, Fariborz M.
    GEO-CONGRESS 2023: SOIL IMPROVEMENT, GEOENVIRONMENTAL, AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 339 : 661 - 670
  • [22] Resource reduction for buildings due to environmental product declarations
    Malkwitz, A.
    Karl, C. K.
    BAUINGENIEUR, 2014, 89 : 202 - 208
  • [23] Environmental product declarations (EPDS): What's in it for steel?
    Vissers, P
    STEEL IN SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION: IISI WORLD CONFERENCE 2002, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 347 - 352
  • [24] Environmental Product Declarations: Market Adaptation to the New Reality
    Bowyer, Jim
    FOREST PRODUCTS JOURNAL, 2015, 65 (7-8) : 305 - 306
  • [25] Environmental Product Declarations worldwide: a case study in Argentina
    Marcelo Marzocchini
    Javier Martin Echazarreta
    Verónica Gulivart
    Marina Lago Mathisen
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2023, 28 : 955 - 966
  • [26] Data Specificity of Concrete Mixture Environmental Product Declarations
    Cooper, Michelle A.
    Mukherjee, Amlan
    PAVEMENT, ROADWAY, AND BRIDGE LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT 2024, ISPRB LCA 2024, 2024, 51 : 187 - 197
  • [27] Environmental Product Declarations worldwide: a case study in Argentina
    Marzocchini, Marcelo
    Echazarreta, Javier Martin
    Gulivart, Veronica
    Mathisen, Marina Lago
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2023, 28 (08): : 955 - 966
  • [28] International survey of the costs of assessment for environmental product declarations
    Tasaki, Tomohiro
    Shobatake, Koichi
    Nakajima, Kenichi
    Dalhammar, Carl
    24TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING, 2017, 61 : 727 - 731
  • [29] Environmental Product Declarations for plants and soils: how to quantify carbon uptake in landscape design and construction?
    Matti Kuittinen
    Ranja Hautamäki
    Eeva-Maria Tuhkanen
    Anu Riikonen
    Mari Ariluoma
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 1100 - 1116
  • [30] Environmental Product Declarations for plants and soils: how to quantify carbon uptake in landscape design and construction?
    Kuittinen, Matti
    Hautamaki, Ranja
    Tuhkanen, Eeva-Maria
    Riikonen, Anu
    Ariluoma, Mari
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (06): : 1100 - 1116