Assessing and mitigating environmental impacts of construction materials: Insights from environmental product declarations

被引:0
|
作者
Yu, Zhonghan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Nurdiawati, Anissa [1 ,2 ]
Kanwal, Qudsia [1 ,2 ]
Al-Humaiqani, Mohammed M. [1 ,2 ]
Al-Ghamdi, Sami G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Environmental Science and Engineering Program, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal,23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
[2] KAUST Climate and Livability Initiative, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal,23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
[3] School of Ecology and Environment, Renmin University of China, Beijing,100872, China
来源
关键词
Carbon capture and storage - Carbon capture and utilization - Carbon sequestration - Direct air capture - Zero-carbon;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110929
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Construction activities significantly impact natural resources and the environment, accounting for 40 % of global energy consumption and 36 % of carbon emissions. This study evaluates the environmental impacts of various primary construction materials by leveraging more original and comprehensive Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) and incorporates insights from prevvious research to summarize effective mitigation strategies. Analyzing the environmental impact per unit mass is a critical step toward building-level assessments, enabling the strategic replacement of high-pollution materials with lower-impact alternatives to optimize environmental outcomes. The quantitative analysis of data from 180 EPDs indicates that aluminum and steel have the highest median total environmental impacts per unit mass, followed by plastics, while wood, cement, and concrete have relatively lower impacts. Overall, Abiotic Depletion Potential (ADP) and Global Warming Potential (GWP) are identified as the primary environmental impacts of construction materials. At the building level, the environmental footprint varies based on the quantity of each material used, leading to substantial overall impacts. Furthermore, this study explores the relationships between different environmental impacts, finding positive correlations between GWP and Primary Energy Non-Renewable Energy (PENRE), Acidification Potential (AP), and Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP). A comprehensive literature review identifies the key environmental hotspots and mitigation strategies for high-impact materials such as aluminum, steel, cement, and concrete. Common strategies include innovative production methods, waste recycling, carbon capture and storage (CCS), and the development of low-carbon materials. By integrating quantitative EPDs analysis with a qualitative literature review, this research provides a holistic understanding of the environmental burdens of construction materials, offering a valuable framework for developing sustainable policies and practices within the construction industry. © 2024 The Authors
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of type III environmental product declarations for construction products: Material sourcing and harmonization evaluation
    Gelowitz, M. D. C.
    McArthur, J. J.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 157 : 125 - 133
  • [32] The Dutch approach for assessing and reducing environmental impacts of building materials
    de Klijn-Chevalerias, Marie
    Javed, Saqib
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 111 : 147 - 159
  • [33] Reaching the Full Potential of Machine Learning in Mitigating Environmental Impacts of Functional Materials
    Ying He
    Guohong Liu
    Chengjun Li
    Xiliang Yan
    Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2022, 260
  • [34] Evaluation Indexes System for Assessing Road Construction with Recycled Waste Materials to Achieve Better Environmental Impacts
    Chen Dezhen
    Geng Cuijie
    Sun Wenzhou
    ADVANCED BUILDING MATERIALS, PTS 1-4, 2011, 250-253 (1-4): : 1001 - +
  • [35] Reaching the Full Potential of Machine Learning in Mitigating Environmental Impacts of Functional Materials
    He, Ying
    Liu, Guohong
    Li, Chengjun
    Yan, Xiliang
    REVIEWS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 2022, 260 (01)
  • [36] Alternative materials as an opportunity to reduce environmental impacts in the construction sector
    Fernanda Hernandez-Zamora, Maria
    Jimenez-Martinez, Sebastian
    Ignacio Sanchez-Monge, Juan
    TECNOLOGIA EN MARCHA, 2021, 34 (02): : 3 - 10
  • [37] Sustainability of earth building materials - Environmental product declarations as an instrument of competition in building material industry
    Schroeder, Horst
    Lemke, Manfred
    VITRUVIO-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL TECHNOLOGY AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, (01): : 45 - 55
  • [38] Environmental product declarations for building materials and products: u.s. policy and market drivers
    Simonen, Kathrina L.
    Haselbach, Liv M.
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION: CIVIL ENGINEERING AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 86 : 197 - 204
  • [39] ASSESSING THE IMPACTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION
    RODRICKS, J
    HARRIS, R
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1983, 185 (MAR): : 37 - CHAS
  • [40] APPROACH TO ASSESSING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
    FISCHER, DW
    DAVIES, GS
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1973, 1 (03) : 207 - 227