NEW LANDFILL CRITERIA. THE CRITERIA FROM A NATIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FIRM'S VIEW.

被引:0
|
作者
Greco, James R.
机构
来源
关键词
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION - Legislation - STANDARDS - WASTE DISPOSAL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
On September 13, 1979, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published its final rule for defining the criteria to be used for classifying solid waste disposal facilities and practices. The criteria establish a level of proection necessary to provide that ″no reasonable probability of adverse effects on health or the environment″ will result from operation of a ″sanitary landfill″ facility. Hence in setting these criteria the EPA is providing a general definition of ″sanitary landfill″ and ″open dump″ while citing that landfills can be located, designed, and operated in an environmentally-safe manner. However, the author believes that EPA developed the criteria more from a mandate for environmental protection than from a mandate of clear Congressional direction. While commendable so as to fulfill the broad objectives of the law, actual implementation of the criteria - and hence the law - may be stymied by judicial judgments and legal interpretations resulting from litigation. The likely effect of these criteria when used for evaluating a facility remains uncertain. Much of this uncertainty stems from the fact that the determination of compliance or non-compliance can depend upon the evaluator's interpretation of the criteria. As published, the criteria do not address closure requirements.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 85
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] New perspectives on sanitation management: proposing a model for municipal solid waste landfill
    Dacach Fernandez Marchi, Cristina Maria
    URBE-REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GESTAO URBANA, 2015, 7 (01): : 91 - 105
  • [22] Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making to optimise solid waste management
    Garcia-Garcia G.
    Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 2022, 37
  • [23] A multiple criteria analysis for-household solid waste management in the urban community of Dakar
    Kapepula, Ka-Mbayu
    Colson, Gerard
    Sabri, Karim
    Thonart, Philippe
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 27 (11) : 1690 - 1705
  • [24] Index of Environmental Sustainabilty: Criteria and Challenges of Implentation on Malaysian Municipal Solid Waste Management
    Samsudin, Khairunnisa Syarafina
    Mat, Sohif
    Razali, Halim
    Basri, Noor Ezlin Ahmad
    Aini, Zulkifli
    JURNAL KEJURUTERAAN, 2019, 31 (02): : 349 - 356
  • [25] Multi-criteria analysis for municipal solid waste management in a Brazilian metropolitan area
    Santos, Simone Machado
    Silva, Maisa Mendonca
    Melo, Renata Maciel
    Gavazza, Savia
    Florencio, Lourdinha
    Kato, Mario T.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2017, 189 (11)
  • [26] Performing Multi-Criteria Analysis to Solve Municipal Solid Waste Management Problems
    Pascu, Dan
    Tamasila, Matei
    Diaconescu, Andra
    Prostean, Gabriela
    INNOVATION MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION EXCELLENCE THROUGH VISION 2020, VOLS I -XI, 2018, : 2289 - 2298
  • [27] The use of '5E' criteria for the optimal planning of solid waste management systems
    Chang, NB
    Chang, YH
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWELFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOLID WASTE TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 1996, : U167 - U168
  • [28] A multi-criteria assessment of alternative sustainable solid waste management of flexible packaging
    Pongpimol, Somying
    Badir, Yuosre F.
    Erik, Bohez L. J.
    Sukhotu, Vatcharapol
    MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2020, 31 (01) : 201 - 222
  • [29] Multi-criteria analysis for municipal solid waste management in a Brazilian metropolitan area
    Simone Machado Santos
    Maisa Mendonça Silva
    Renata Maciel Melo
    Savia Gavazza
    Lourdinha Florencio
    Mario T. Kato
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2017, 189
  • [30] Potential landfill site selection for solid waste disposal using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA)
    Kapilan, S.
    Elangovan, K.
    JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY, 2018, 25 (03) : 570 - 585