The impact of lightweighting and battery technologies on the sustainability of electric vehicles: A comprehensive life cycle assessment

被引:0
|
作者
机构
[1] Ahmadzadeh, Omidreza
[2] Rodriguez, Renato
[3] Getz, Jonah
[4] Panneerselvam, Samy
[5] Soudbakhsh, Damoon
关键词
Greenhouse gas emissions;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107668
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We present a comprehensive analysis of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of two battery electric vehicles (BEVs) using detailed teardown data and contrast them with those of four internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). We used the teardown data to calculate the production and recycling phases as well as for the vehicle dynamics modeling and estimating the utilization phase GHGs. After validating the models and establishing a baseline, we analyzed the effect of new trends on their net carbon footprint. Specifically, we considered lightweighting, battery technology, and charging technologies and showed the tradeoff between longer-range BEVs and their sustainability as a green alternative to ICEVs. The GHGs were calculated based on a life cycle assessment, including the vehicles' production, utilization, and disposal/recycling life. The GHGs of the production phase were calculated using detailed vehicle teardown data rather than general assumptions about the vehicles' material composition. Similarly, the utilization phase GHGs were estimated by first creating accurate dynamic models of the vehicles and validating them against vehicle test data. Then, we analyzed the effect of charging type and electricity source on the sustainability of these technologies. These studies showed that the average (mixed) US electricity source accounts for about 50 % of GHGs, and changing charging from household to station or supercharging can save about 8 % of GHG emissions. Next, we studied the effect of battery technology and lightweighting on EVs' net GHGs. OEMs have exploited both of these options to reduce the car's weight and improve its electrical consumption during the utilization phase (driving). Our study showed that while the higher energy density of battery technologies like NMC and NCAs is attractive for reducing the vehicle's weight and increasing its range, the use of rare materials significantly increases GHG emissions during production. Similarly, we showed that lightweighting by substituting steel with aluminum alloys (such as giga-casting) adds more production GHGs that significantly offset the savings in electrical consumption achieved during the vehicle's lifetime. Therefore, this study proposes three pivotal considerations in the design and utilization of electric vehicles: battery material selection, trade-off analysis for vehicle lightweighting, and adoption of efficient charging methods and energy sources, all of which aim to reduce their overall global carbon footprint. © 2024 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment on Battery Electric Vehicles
    Zhang, Yaowei
    Liao, Yanfen
    Liu, Guicai
    Hu, Shanchao
    Ma, Xiaoqian
    Yang, Ru
    He, Junfei
    [J]. ENERGY SCIENCE AND APPLIED TECHNOLOGY, 2016, : 89 - 94
  • [2] Optimal lightweighting in battery electric vehicles
    Hofer, Johannes
    Wilhelm, Erik
    Schenler, Warren
    [J]. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 2012, 5 (03): : 751 - 762
  • [3] Lightweighting electric vehicles: Scoping review of life cycle assessments
    Cimprich, Alexander
    Sadayappan, Kumar
    Young, Steven B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 433
  • [4] Life cycle assessment of lithium oxygen battery for electric vehicles
    Wang, Fenfen
    Deng, Yelin
    Yuan, Chris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 264
  • [5] Life cycle assessment of lithium sulfur battery for electric vehicles
    Deng, Yelin
    Li, Jianyang
    Li, Tonghui
    Gao, Xianfeng
    Yuan, Chris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2017, 343 : 284 - 295
  • [6] A coherent life cycle assessment of a range of lightweighting strategies for compact vehicles
    Raugei, Marco
    Morrey, Denise
    Hutchinson, Allan
    Winfield, Patricia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 108 : 1168 - 1176
  • [7] Life cycle environmental impact assessment for battery-powered electric vehicles at the global and regional levels
    Zhang, Hongliang
    Xue, Bingya
    Li, Songnian
    Yu, Yajuan
    Li, Xi
    Chang, Zeyu
    Wu, Haohui
    Hu, Yuchen
    Huang, Kai
    Liu, Lei
    Chen, Lai
    Su, Yuefeng
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [8] Life cycle environmental impact assessment for battery-powered electric vehicles at the global and regional levels
    Hongliang Zhang
    Bingya Xue
    Songnian Li
    Yajuan Yu
    Xi Li
    Zeyu Chang
    Haohui Wu
    Yuchen Hu
    Kai Huang
    Lei Liu
    Lai Chen
    Yuefeng Su
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 13
  • [9] A Comprehensive Sustainability Assessment of Battery Electric Vehicles, Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles, and Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles through a Comparative Circular Economy Assessment Approach
    Ahmed, Aser Alaa
    Nazzal, Mohammad A.
    Darras, Basil M.
    Deiab, Ibrahim M.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [10] Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Electric Vehicles: Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing Evaluation of Electricity Sources
    Rapa, Mattia
    Gobbi, Laura
    Ruggieri, Roberto
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (23)