The impact of lightweighting and battery technologies on the sustainability of electric vehicles: A comprehensive life cycle assessment

被引:0
|
作者
机构
[1] Ahmadzadeh, Omidreza
[2] Rodriguez, Renato
[3] Getz, Jonah
[4] Panneerselvam, Samy
[5] Soudbakhsh, Damoon
关键词
Greenhouse gas emissions;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107668
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We present a comprehensive analysis of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of two battery electric vehicles (BEVs) using detailed teardown data and contrast them with those of four internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). We used the teardown data to calculate the production and recycling phases as well as for the vehicle dynamics modeling and estimating the utilization phase GHGs. After validating the models and establishing a baseline, we analyzed the effect of new trends on their net carbon footprint. Specifically, we considered lightweighting, battery technology, and charging technologies and showed the tradeoff between longer-range BEVs and their sustainability as a green alternative to ICEVs. The GHGs were calculated based on a life cycle assessment, including the vehicles' production, utilization, and disposal/recycling life. The GHGs of the production phase were calculated using detailed vehicle teardown data rather than general assumptions about the vehicles' material composition. Similarly, the utilization phase GHGs were estimated by first creating accurate dynamic models of the vehicles and validating them against vehicle test data. Then, we analyzed the effect of charging type and electricity source on the sustainability of these technologies. These studies showed that the average (mixed) US electricity source accounts for about 50 % of GHGs, and changing charging from household to station or supercharging can save about 8 % of GHG emissions. Next, we studied the effect of battery technology and lightweighting on EVs' net GHGs. OEMs have exploited both of these options to reduce the car's weight and improve its electrical consumption during the utilization phase (driving). Our study showed that while the higher energy density of battery technologies like NMC and NCAs is attractive for reducing the vehicle's weight and increasing its range, the use of rare materials significantly increases GHG emissions during production. Similarly, we showed that lightweighting by substituting steel with aluminum alloys (such as giga-casting) adds more production GHGs that significantly offset the savings in electrical consumption achieved during the vehicle's lifetime. Therefore, this study proposes three pivotal considerations in the design and utilization of electric vehicles: battery material selection, trade-off analysis for vehicle lightweighting, and adoption of efficient charging methods and energy sources, all of which aim to reduce their overall global carbon footprint. © 2024 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Beyond Tailpipe Emissions: Life Cycle Assessment Unravels Battery's Carbon Footprint in Electric Vehicles
    Ankathi, Sharath K.
    Bouchard, Jessey
    He, Xin
    [J]. WORLD ELECTRIC VEHICLE JOURNAL, 2024, 15 (06):
  • [32] Life cycle assessment of lithium ion battery from water-based manufacturing for electric vehicles
    Shen, Kang
    Zhai, Qiang
    Gu, Yu
    Wang, Weibo
    Cao, Huajun
    Hauschild, Michael
    Yuan, Chris
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2023, 198
  • [33] Environmental life cycle assessment of battery electric vehicles from the current and future energy mix perspective
    Shafique, Muhammad
    Luo, Xiaowei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 303
  • [34] Quantification of Non-linearities in the Consequential Life Cycle Assessment of the Use Phase of Battery Electric Vehicles
    Rovelli, Davide
    Cornago, Simone
    Scaglia, Pietro
    Brondi, Carlo
    Low, Jonathan Sze Choong
    Ramakrishna, Seeram
    Dotelli, Giovanni
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 2
  • [35] Switchable Heat Pipes for Eco-Friendly Battery Cooling in Electric Vehicles: A Life Cycle Assessment
    Illner, Maike
    Thuesing, Kai
    Salles, Ana
    Trettenhann, Anian
    Albrecht, Stefan
    Winkler, Markus
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (04)
  • [36] BEVSIM: Battery electric vehicle sustainability impact assessment model
    Mehta, Rajesh
    Golkaram, Milad
    Vogels, Jack T. W. E.
    Ligthart, Tom
    Someren, Eugene
    Ferjan, Spela
    Lennartz, Jelmer
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2023, 27 (05) : 1266 - 1276
  • [37] THE ROLE OF ENVIRONMENTAL LIFE CYCLE COSTING IN SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT OF THE TECHNOLOGIES
    Janik, Agnieszka
    [J]. ECOLOGY, ECONOMICS, EDUCATION AND LEGISLATION CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, SGEM 2016, VOL III, 2016, : 677 - 684
  • [38] Life Cycle Assessment of Battery Electric and Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles Considering the Impact of Electricity Generation Mix: A Case Study in China
    Tang, Bowen
    Xu, Yi
    Wang, Mingyang
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (02)
  • [39] Life cycle assessment of electric vehicles in comparison to combustion engine vehicles: A review
    Verma, Shrey
    Dwivedi, Gaurav
    Verma, Puneet
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 49 : 217 - 222
  • [40] Commercialization of Lithium Battery Technologies for Electric Vehicles
    Zeng, Xiaoqiao
    Li, Matthew
    Abd El-Hady, Deia
    Alshitari, Wael
    Al-Bogami, Abdullah S.
    Lu, Jun
    Amine, Khalil
    [J]. ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS, 2019, 9 (27)