The impact of lightweighting and battery technologies on the sustainability of electric vehicles: A comprehensive life cycle assessment

被引:0
|
作者
机构
[1] Ahmadzadeh, Omidreza
[2] Rodriguez, Renato
[3] Getz, Jonah
[4] Panneerselvam, Samy
[5] Soudbakhsh, Damoon
关键词
Greenhouse gas emissions;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107668
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We present a comprehensive analysis of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of two battery electric vehicles (BEVs) using detailed teardown data and contrast them with those of four internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). We used the teardown data to calculate the production and recycling phases as well as for the vehicle dynamics modeling and estimating the utilization phase GHGs. After validating the models and establishing a baseline, we analyzed the effect of new trends on their net carbon footprint. Specifically, we considered lightweighting, battery technology, and charging technologies and showed the tradeoff between longer-range BEVs and their sustainability as a green alternative to ICEVs. The GHGs were calculated based on a life cycle assessment, including the vehicles' production, utilization, and disposal/recycling life. The GHGs of the production phase were calculated using detailed vehicle teardown data rather than general assumptions about the vehicles' material composition. Similarly, the utilization phase GHGs were estimated by first creating accurate dynamic models of the vehicles and validating them against vehicle test data. Then, we analyzed the effect of charging type and electricity source on the sustainability of these technologies. These studies showed that the average (mixed) US electricity source accounts for about 50 % of GHGs, and changing charging from household to station or supercharging can save about 8 % of GHG emissions. Next, we studied the effect of battery technology and lightweighting on EVs' net GHGs. OEMs have exploited both of these options to reduce the car's weight and improve its electrical consumption during the utilization phase (driving). Our study showed that while the higher energy density of battery technologies like NMC and NCAs is attractive for reducing the vehicle's weight and increasing its range, the use of rare materials significantly increases GHG emissions during production. Similarly, we showed that lightweighting by substituting steel with aluminum alloys (such as giga-casting) adds more production GHGs that significantly offset the savings in electrical consumption achieved during the vehicle's lifetime. Therefore, this study proposes three pivotal considerations in the design and utilization of electric vehicles: battery material selection, trade-off analysis for vehicle lightweighting, and adoption of efficient charging methods and energy sources, all of which aim to reduce their overall global carbon footprint. © 2024 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Material footprint of electric vehicles: A multiregional life cycle assessment
    Sen, Burak
    Onat, Nuri C.
    Kucukvar, Murat
    Tatari, Omer
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 209 : 1033 - 1043
  • [42] Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles
    Hawkins, Troy R.
    Singh, Bhawna
    Majeau-Bettez, Guillaume
    Stromman, Anders Hammer
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2013, 17 (01) : 53 - 64
  • [43] Life cycle assessment of electric vehicles: a systematic review of literature
    Das, Pabitra Kumar
    Bhat, Mohammad Younus
    Sajith, Shambhu
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2024, 31 (01) : 1314 - 1330
  • [44] Life-cycle assessment of electric vehicles in the United States
    Humphreys, KK
    Placet, M
    Singh, M
    [J]. IECEC 96 - PROCEEDINGS OF THE 31ST INTERSOCIETY ENERGY CONVERSION ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-4, 1996, : 2124 - 2127
  • [45] Life cycle assessment of electric vehicles: a systematic review of literature
    Pabitra Kumar Das
    Mohammad Younus Bhat
    Shambhu Sajith
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 : 73 - 89
  • [46] Development of Hybrid Electric Vehicles in the Context of Life Cycle Assessment
    Weber, P.
    Toedter, O.
    Koch, T.
    Weyhing, T.
    [J]. CONFERENCE ON THERMO-AND FLUID DYNAMICS OF CLEAN PROPULSION POWERPLANTS, THIESEL 2022, 2022,
  • [47] Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Sport Utility Vehicles: The Case for Qatar
    Aboushaqrah, Nour N. M.
    Onat, Nuri Cihat
    Kucukvar, Murat
    Jabbar, Rateb
    [J]. SMART AND GREEN SOLUTIONS FOR TRANSPORT SYSTEMS, 2020, 1091 : 279 - 287
  • [48] A life-cycle assessment of battery electric and internal combustion engine vehicles: A case in Hebei Province, China
    Shi, Sainan
    Zhang, Haoran
    Yang, Wen
    Zhang, Qianru
    Wang, Xuejun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 228 : 606 - 618
  • [49] An equalizing charge control strategy to extend battery cycle life for electric vehicles
    Xu, Shungang
    Wang, Jinping
    Xu, Jianping
    [J]. Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 2012, 32 (03): : 43 - 48
  • [50] Implication viability assessment of electric vehicles for different regions: An approach of life cycle assessment considering exergy analysis and battery degradation
    Nimesh, Vikas
    Kumari, Ranjana
    Soni, Neelesh
    Goswami, Arkopal K.
    Reddy, V. Mahendra
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 237