Age-related differences in psychometric properties of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0): a retrospective analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Karsikas, Mika [1 ]
Saltychev, Mikhail [2 ,3 ]
Juhola, Juhani [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Med Sch, Dept Clin Med, Turku, Finland
[2] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Phys & Rehabil Med, POB 528, FI-20701 Turku, Finland
[3] Univ Turku, Turku, Finland
关键词
cross-sectional studies; data accuracy; musculoskeletal diseases; psychometrics; validation studies; validity and reliability;
D O I
10.1097/MRR.0000000000000645
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to detect a possible age-related differential item functioning (DIF) of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) among people with musculoskeletal disorders. This was a cross-sectional study of 1739 consecutive patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain at a university clinic. Difficulty and discrimination parameters were calculated for each of 12 items of the WHODAS 2.0 using item response theory. The presence of DIF was assessed both numerically and graphically. When considering differences in both difficulty and discrimination, a statistically significant DIF was observed for all the items except for the item 'washing' (P values <0.001). The DIF was mostly uniform. Items 'standing', 'household responsibilities', 'learning a new task', 'emotional affectedness', 'concentrating', 'washing' and 'dressing' showed better precision among older patients. Items 'walking', 'dealing with strangers', 'maintaining a friendship' and 'day-to-day work' were more informative among younger patients. Difficulty and discrimination parameters were alike for all 12 items. The DIF was mostly uniform. These results can be taken into account when applying the WHODAS 2.0 to people with musculoskeletal complaints, especially when the studied groups are predominated by people of certain age.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 281
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Psychometric Evaluation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Using Rasch Analysis
    Snell, Deborah
    Siegert, Richard
    Silverberg, Noah
    BRAIN INJURY, 2019, 33 : 59 - 59
  • [42] Mapping the 12-item World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) onto the assessment of quality of life (AQoL)-4D utilities
    Ma, Bernice Hua
    Chen, Gang
    Badji, Samia
    Petrie, Dennis
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2024, 33 (02) : 411 - 422
  • [43] The Sociodemographic Factors Related to Disability of Applicants of Welfare Benefits in Greece: A Cross-Sectional Survey Based on the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0
    Theotokatos, Georgios
    Escorpizo, Reuben
    Angelopoulos, Theodore J.
    Chrysagis, Nikolaos K.
    Venieri, Aikaterini
    Bickenbach, Jerome
    Karteroliotis, Konstantinos
    Grammatopoulou, Eirini
    Skordilis, Emmanouil
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [44] Mapping the 12-item World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) onto the assessment of quality of life (AQoL)-4D utilities
    Bernice Hua Ma
    Gang Chen
    Samia Badji
    Dennis Petrie
    Quality of Life Research, 2024, 33 : 411 - 422
  • [45] Minimal clinically important difference and minimal detectable change of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) amongst patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain
    Katajapuu, Niina
    Heinonen, Ari
    Saltychev, Mikhail
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2020, 34 (12) : 1506 - 1511
  • [46] Validation of the Polish version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in an elderly population (60-70 yearsold)
    Cwirlej-Sozanska, Agnieszka
    Wilmowska-Pietruszynska, Anna
    Sozanski, Bernard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND ERGONOMICS, 2018, 24 (03) : 386 - 394
  • [47] Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in adults with spinal cord injury in Taiwan: a psychometric study
    Tzu-Ying Chiu
    Monika E. Finger
    Carolina S. Fellinghauer
    Reuben Escorpizo
    Wen-Chou Chi
    Tsan-Hon Liou
    Chia-Feng Yen
    Spinal Cord, 2019, 57 : 516 - 524
  • [48] Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in adults with spinal cord injury in Taiwan: a psychometric study
    Chiu, Tzu-Ying
    Finger, Monika E.
    Fellinghauer, Carolina S.
    Escorpizo, Reuben
    Chi, Wen-Chou
    Liou, Tsan-Hon
    Yen, Chia-Feng
    SPINAL CORD, 2019, 57 (06) : 516 - 524
  • [49] Psychometric Properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale 2.0 among Iranian Cancer Patients
    Norouzi, Hassan
    Roohi, Samaneh
    Shahhosseini, Meysam
    Ghasemabady, Robabeh Nouri
    MIDDLE EAST JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 11 (03) : 333 - 342
  • [50] Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS-2.0) Within the Clubhouse Model of Psychosocial Rehabilitation for Serious Mental Illness
    Wojtalik, Jessica A.
    Kotwani, Anju
    Honarvar, Rochanne L.
    Eack, Shaun M.
    D'Angelo, Lori
    Whiting-Madison, Chrissy
    Brown, Wilson J.
    PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION JOURNAL, 2024, 47 (03) : 229 - 239