Age-related differences in psychometric properties of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0): a retrospective analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Karsikas, Mika [1 ]
Saltychev, Mikhail [2 ,3 ]
Juhola, Juhani [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Med Sch, Dept Clin Med, Turku, Finland
[2] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Phys & Rehabil Med, POB 528, FI-20701 Turku, Finland
[3] Univ Turku, Turku, Finland
关键词
cross-sectional studies; data accuracy; musculoskeletal diseases; psychometrics; validation studies; validity and reliability;
D O I
10.1097/MRR.0000000000000645
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to detect a possible age-related differential item functioning (DIF) of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) among people with musculoskeletal disorders. This was a cross-sectional study of 1739 consecutive patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain at a university clinic. Difficulty and discrimination parameters were calculated for each of 12 items of the WHODAS 2.0 using item response theory. The presence of DIF was assessed both numerically and graphically. When considering differences in both difficulty and discrimination, a statistically significant DIF was observed for all the items except for the item 'washing' (P values <0.001). The DIF was mostly uniform. Items 'standing', 'household responsibilities', 'learning a new task', 'emotional affectedness', 'concentrating', 'washing' and 'dressing' showed better precision among older patients. Items 'walking', 'dealing with strangers', 'maintaining a friendship' and 'day-to-day work' were more informative among younger patients. Difficulty and discrimination parameters were alike for all 12 items. The DIF was mostly uniform. These results can be taken into account when applying the WHODAS 2.0 to people with musculoskeletal complaints, especially when the studied groups are predominated by people of certain age.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 281
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with Huntington disease (HD)
    Carlozzi, Noelle E.
    Kratz, Anna L.
    Downing, Nancy R.
    Goodnight, Siera
    Miner, Jennifer A.
    Migliore, Nicholas
    Paulsen, Jane S.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (08) : 1963 - 1971
  • [22] Validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with Huntington disease (HD)
    Noelle E. Carlozzi
    Anna L. Kratz
    Nancy R. Downing
    Siera Goodnight
    Jennifer A. Miner
    Nicholas Migliore
    Jane S. Paulsen
    Quality of Life Research, 2015, 24 : 1963 - 1971
  • [23] Gender-related differences in psychometric properties of WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
    Katajapuu, Niina
    Laimi, Katri
    Heinonen, Ari
    Saltychev, Mikhail
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2019, 42 (04) : 316 - 321
  • [24] Comparing the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in children and adolescents
    de la Pena, Francisco R.
    Escalona, Mariana Paulina
    Ulloa, Rosa Elena
    Palacios-Cruz, Lino
    Palacio, Juan David
    Mayer, Pablo
    Diaz, Ricardo
    Rosetti, Marcos Francisco
    SALUD MENTAL, 2024, 47 (03) : 137 - 143
  • [25] Psychometric measurement properties of the world health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS) evaluated among veterans with mild traumatic brain injury and behavioral health conditions
    Herrold, Amy A.
    Kletzel, Sandra L.
    Mallinson, Trudy
    Pape, Theresa L. Bender
    Weaver, Jennifer A.
    Guernon, Ann
    Smith, Bridget
    Babcock-Parziale, Judith
    High, Walter M.
    Sesso-Osburn, Francis
    Vis, Lynnea
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 43 (09) : 1313 - 1322
  • [26] Functioning and disability of premenopausal women with urinary incontinence: An assessment by using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-WHODAS 2.0
    de Macedo Dantas, Thaissa Hamana
    Castaneda, Luciana
    Correia, Grasiela Nascimento
    das Chagas Campelo, Clarissa Loureiro
    Dantas, Diego de Sousa
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2019, 38 (06) : 1767 - 1774
  • [27] The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in a chronic pain population being considered for chronic opioid therapy
    Wawrzyniak, Kelly M.
    Finkelman, Matthew
    Schatman, Michael E.
    Kulich, Ronald J.
    Weed, Valerie F.
    Myrta, Eura
    DiBenedetto, David J.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2019, 12 : 1855 - 1862
  • [28] Adapting World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 for Nepal
    Ajay Risal
    Dipak Kunwar
    Eliza Karki
    Shambhu Prasad Adhikari
    Inosha Bimali
    Barsha Shrestha
    Subekshya Khadka
    Are Holen
    BMC Psychology, 9
  • [29] Adapting World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 for Nepal
    Risal, Ajay
    Kunwar, Dipak
    Karki, Eliza
    Adhikari, Shambhu Prasad
    Bimali, Inosha
    Shrestha, Barsha
    Khadka, Subekshya
    Holen, Are
    BMC PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 9 (01)
  • [30] Diabetes and disability - a latent class analysis of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
    Seet, V.
    Abdin, E.
    Jeyagurunathan, A.
    Tan, S. C.
    Lee, E. S.
    Vaingankar, J.
    Chong, S. A.
    Subramaniam, M.
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2023, 197