Age-related differences in psychometric properties of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0): a retrospective analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Karsikas, Mika [1 ]
Saltychev, Mikhail [2 ,3 ]
Juhola, Juhani [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Med Sch, Dept Clin Med, Turku, Finland
[2] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Phys & Rehabil Med, POB 528, FI-20701 Turku, Finland
[3] Univ Turku, Turku, Finland
关键词
cross-sectional studies; data accuracy; musculoskeletal diseases; psychometrics; validation studies; validity and reliability;
D O I
10.1097/MRR.0000000000000645
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to detect a possible age-related differential item functioning (DIF) of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) among people with musculoskeletal disorders. This was a cross-sectional study of 1739 consecutive patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain at a university clinic. Difficulty and discrimination parameters were calculated for each of 12 items of the WHODAS 2.0 using item response theory. The presence of DIF was assessed both numerically and graphically. When considering differences in both difficulty and discrimination, a statistically significant DIF was observed for all the items except for the item 'washing' (P values <0.001). The DIF was mostly uniform. Items 'standing', 'household responsibilities', 'learning a new task', 'emotional affectedness', 'concentrating', 'washing' and 'dressing' showed better precision among older patients. Items 'walking', 'dealing with strangers', 'maintaining a friendship' and 'day-to-day work' were more informative among younger patients. Difficulty and discrimination parameters were alike for all 12 items. The DIF was mostly uniform. These results can be taken into account when applying the WHODAS 2.0 to people with musculoskeletal complaints, especially when the studied groups are predominated by people of certain age.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 281
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Validity of the 36-item Persian (Farsi) version of the world health organization disability assessment schedule (WHODAS) 2.0
    Rajeziesfahani, Sepideh
    Federici, Stefano
    Bacci, Silvia
    Meloni, Fabio
    Bartolucci, Francesco
    Zahiroddin, Alireza
    Shams, Jamal
    Noorbakhsh, Simasadat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH, 2019, 48 (01) : 14 - 39
  • [32] The Brazilian version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) is reliable and valid for chronic stroke survivors
    Ovando, Angelica Cristiane
    Dall'Agnol, Catiane
    Luiz, Jhoanne Merlyn
    Momo, Renata Andrade
    De Castro, Shamyr Sulyvan
    TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2024, 31 (02) : 211 - 220
  • [33] Reliability and validity of the Brazilian version of the world health organization disability assessment schedule (WHODAS 2.0) questionnaire for women with urinary incontinence
    Ribeiro de Moura, Anna Caroline
    Rocha, Rebeca de Oliveira
    da Silva de Araujo, Ana Karoline
    de Castro, Shamyr Sulyvan
    Moreira, Mayle Andrade
    do Nascimento, Simony Lira
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024, 46 (26) : 6455 - 6460
  • [34] Reliability, internal consistency, and validity of the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 among adults with heart failure
    Gondim, Georgia de Melo Castro
    Bede, Julia Maria Sales
    Martins, Cristiany Azevedo
    da Silva, Francisco Vandecir
    da Silveira, Brenno Lucas Rodrigues
    Ribeiro, Vitoria Fonteles
    da Saude, Scheidt Martins
    Neto, Almino Cavalcante Rocha
    Mesquita, Rafael
    Mont'Alverne, Daniela Gardano Bucharles
    HEART & LUNG, 2025, 70 : 30 - 35
  • [35] Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0), Greek Version: A Cross-Sectional Study on Applicants of Welfare Benefits
    Theotokatos, Georgios
    Escorpizo, Reuben
    Angelopoulos, Theodore J.
    Chrysagis, Nikolaos K.
    Bickenbach, Jerome
    Venieri, Aikaterini
    Karteroliotis, Konstantinos
    Grammatopoulou, Eirini
    Skordilis, Emmanouil
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (11)
  • [36] World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: An international systematic review
    Federici, Stefano
    Bracalenti, Marco
    Meloni, Fabio
    Luciano, Juan V.
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2017, 39 (23) : 2347 - 2380
  • [37] Development of traditional Chinese version of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 36-item (WHODAS 2.0) in Taiwan: Validity and reliability analyses
    Chiu, Tzu-Ying
    Yen, Chia-Feng
    Chou, Cheng-Hsiu
    Lin, Jin-Ding
    Hwang, Ai-Wen
    Liao, Hua-Fang
    Chi, Wen-Chou
    RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2014, 35 (11) : 2812 - 2820
  • [38] Cross-cultural adaptation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for Hebrew-speaking subjects with and without hand injury
    Marom, Batia S.
    Carel, Rafael S.
    Sharabi, Moshe
    Ratzon, Navah Z.
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2017, 39 (12) : 1155 - 1161
  • [39] Correlation between World Health Disability Assessment Schedule (Whodas) 2.0 and six minutes walk test
    Carvalho da Silva, Marcela Maria
    Lozano, Rafaela Sakumotu
    Pereira, Natalia Duarte
    Marrara Marmorato, Kamilla Tays
    De Souza, Nathalia Maria
    Barbosa Zorrer Franco, Francisco Jose
    Vergamini, Gabriela Carreri
    Arcuri, Juliano Ferreira
    Pires Di Lorenzo, Valeria Amorim
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2019, 54
  • [40] Psychometric properties of 12-item self-administered World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) among general population and people with non-acute physical causes of disability - systematic review
    Saltychev, Mikhail
    Katajapuu, Niina
    Barlund, Esa
    Laimi, Katri
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 43 (06) : 789 - 794