Seismic vulnerability assessment using the instrumentation of an existing building

被引:1
|
作者
Duco F. [1 ]
Faye J.-P. [1 ]
Caperaa S. [1 ]
Reubrez E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Université de Toulouse, INP/ENIT, LGP, F-65016 Tarbes
关键词
Existing building; Instrumentation; Modelling; Ophite Tower; Seismic vulnerability;
D O I
10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.482.79
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
France is a country composed of moderate seismic hazard regions but however vulnerable to earthquakes. Indeed, only a few parts of existing buildings have been built using paraseismic regulation. Several current large-scale seismic vulnerability assessment methods are used, as Hazus or Risk-UE, but they are inappropriate to the analysis of a specific building. In our case, we use an experimental approach to study the elastic behaviour of existing buildings: ambient vibration analyses seem to be an interesting way to determine the vulnerability. Ambient noise testing with Output-Only Modal Identification is a low-cost non-destructive method to provide vibration data from civil engineering structures like buildings. The interest of this method is to obtain dynamic parameters with only natural excitations: wind, traffic, human activity... In the frame of the "Plan sé sme des Hautes-Pyŕ́ s", the building considered is the relatively regular 18-storey Ophite Tower located in Lourdes, France. The vibration measurements are conducted using a 24-channel system connected to an acquisition station. The modal parameters of this building (natural frequencies, modal shapes and damping) are calculated using the stochastic subspace identification method. These parameters, extracted from in situ data, are then used to calibrate a model. Having defined damage level criterion, the response motion, produced by seismic events, will lead to the determination of the vulnerability curves of Ophite Tower. © (2011) Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 87
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Seismic Vulnerability Assessment for Masonry Churches: An Overview on Existing Methodologies
    Zizi, Mattia
    Rouhi, Jafar
    Chisari, Corrado
    Cacace, Daniela
    De Matteis, Gianfranco
    BUILDINGS, 2021, 11 (12)
  • [22] Multiscale Seismic Vulnerability Assessment and Retrofit of Existing Masonry Buildings
    Ferreira, Tiago Miguel
    Mendes, Nuno
    Silva, Rui
    BUILDINGS, 2019, 9 (04)
  • [23] RAPID ASSESSMENT OF SEISMIC DEMAND IN EXISTING BUILDING STRUCTURES
    Tsang, Hing-Ho
    Su, Ray K. L.
    Lam, Nelson T. K.
    Lo, S. H.
    STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2009, 18 (04): : 427 - 439
  • [24] Seismic assessment of a R/C strategic existing building
    Mehani, Youcef
    Kibboua, Abderrahmane
    STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, 2007, 26 (06) : 617 - 634
  • [25] Editorial: Seismic Vulnerability Assessment and Retrofitting of Building Structures
    Furtado, Andre
    De Risi, Maria Teresa
    Gautam, Dipendra
    FRONTIERS IN BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 7
  • [26] Towards Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of the Building Stock in Egypt
    M. ElAssaly
    Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2013, 38 : 2953 - 2969
  • [27] Towards Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of the Building Stock in Egypt
    ElAssaly, M.
    ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2013, 38 (11) : 2953 - 2969
  • [28] Evaluation of damage index and seismic vulnerability of an existing high-rise building
    Vibhav, Brungi Sri
    Swaroop, Nalluru
    Reddy, Chereddy Yeswanth
    Kathirvel, Parthiban
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 65 : 1026 - 1032
  • [29] Dynamic Characterisation and Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Existing Masonry Port Structures
    Tarantini, Raffaele
    Cardoni, Alessandro
    Marasco, Sebastiano
    Merlin, Jacopo
    Pribaz, Enrico
    Rupolo, Gianluca
    Domaneschi, Marco
    Cimellaro, Gian Paolo
    SEISMIC ISOLATION, ENERGY DISSIPATION AND ACTIVE VIBRATION CONTROL OF STRUCTURES, 17WCSI 2022, 2023, 309 : 1032 - 1042
  • [30] Seismic vulnerability assessment of existing private RC constructions in northern Algeria
    Belhamdi, Nourredine
    Kibboua, Abderrahmane
    Tahakourt, Abdelkader
    EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES, 2022, 22 (01) : 25 - 38