Seismic vulnerability assessment using the instrumentation of an existing building

被引:1
|
作者
Duco F. [1 ]
Faye J.-P. [1 ]
Caperaa S. [1 ]
Reubrez E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Université de Toulouse, INP/ENIT, LGP, F-65016 Tarbes
关键词
Existing building; Instrumentation; Modelling; Ophite Tower; Seismic vulnerability;
D O I
10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.482.79
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
France is a country composed of moderate seismic hazard regions but however vulnerable to earthquakes. Indeed, only a few parts of existing buildings have been built using paraseismic regulation. Several current large-scale seismic vulnerability assessment methods are used, as Hazus or Risk-UE, but they are inappropriate to the analysis of a specific building. In our case, we use an experimental approach to study the elastic behaviour of existing buildings: ambient vibration analyses seem to be an interesting way to determine the vulnerability. Ambient noise testing with Output-Only Modal Identification is a low-cost non-destructive method to provide vibration data from civil engineering structures like buildings. The interest of this method is to obtain dynamic parameters with only natural excitations: wind, traffic, human activity... In the frame of the "Plan sé sme des Hautes-Pyŕ́ s", the building considered is the relatively regular 18-storey Ophite Tower located in Lourdes, France. The vibration measurements are conducted using a 24-channel system connected to an acquisition station. The modal parameters of this building (natural frequencies, modal shapes and damping) are calculated using the stochastic subspace identification method. These parameters, extracted from in situ data, are then used to calibrate a model. Having defined damage level criterion, the response motion, produced by seismic events, will lead to the determination of the vulnerability curves of Ophite Tower. © (2011) Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 87
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] SEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING RC STRUCTURES SUBJECTED TO MULTIPLE EARTHQUAKES
    Nadeem, Kainaat
    Mohammad, Aslam Faqeer
    INGEGNERIA SISMICA, 2021, 38 (04): : 1 - 36
  • [32] Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings in Urban Centers
    Ferreira, Tiago Miguel
    Rodrigues, Hugo
    Vicente, Romeu
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (05) : 1 - 20
  • [33] Building vulnerability assessment in seismic areas using ensemble learning: A Nepal case study
    Chen, Weiyi
    Zhang, Limao
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 350
  • [34] Seismic performance evaluation of existing building using Seismic Index method
    Kurniawandy, Alex
    Nakazawa, Shoji
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING (ICANCEE 2018), 2019, 276
  • [35] Seismic vulnerability assessment and strengthening of an existing typical Indian unreinforced masonry building in a high-risk seismic zone-a comprehensive application
    Rohit Maheshwari
    Binay Kumar Singh
    Rui Marques
    Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 2024, 9 (11)
  • [36] Seismic vulnerability assessment of masonry building supported by STRP isolators
    Zisan M.B.
    Haque M.N.
    Hasan M.A.
    Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2023, 24 (1) : 121 - 136
  • [37] Seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete school building in Nepal
    Ghimire N.
    Chaulagain H.
    Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2021, 22 (2) : 249 - 262
  • [38] Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Ancient Masonry Building: an Experimental Method
    Mendes, N.
    Lourenco, P. B.
    Campos-Costa, A.
    7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC CONSTRUCTIONS: STRENGTHENING AND RETROFITTING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2010, 133-134 : 635 - +
  • [39] Rapid Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Building Stocks for Developing Countries
    Nanda, Radhikesh P.
    Majhi, Deepti Ranjan
    KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2014, 18 (07) : 2218 - 2226
  • [40] Rapid seismic vulnerability assessment of building stocks for developing countries
    Radhikesh P. Nanda
    Deepti Ranjan Majhi
    KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2014, 18 : 2218 - 2226