定性比较分析(QCA)中的稳健性研究:分析策略与未来方向

被引:0
|
作者
程恋军 [1 ]
王琳茜 [2 ]
机构
[1] 辽宁工程技术大学公共管理与法学院
[2] 辽宁工程技术大学工商管理学院
关键词
QCA稳健性分析; 选择困境; 操作策略; 动态性; 不稳健;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C3 [社会科学研究方法]; F272.92 [人事管理];
学科分类号
摘要
作为一种融合定性与定量的新兴研究方法 ,定性比较分析(QCA)在社会科学研究中得到广泛应用,然而操作策略自主性所导致的敏感性和随机性使其倍受质疑。现有稳健性检验尽管一定程度上解决了这一问题,但在应用上仍然存在“选择困境”和“技术乱象”。针对上述现象,本研究梳理了QCA稳健性检验方法的最新进展,分析现有QCA稳健性检验的十二种方法及其操作策略;在此基础上,给出了QCA稳健性检验的集合优先、多维检验、样本规模适用性以及价值说明四个原则;提出学者需要重视动态性分析和“不稳健”现象,挖掘“不稳健”背后的深层逻辑,以获得新的知识和发现。研究有利于QCA稳健性检验方法的规范应用,将稳健性检验从“技术观”拓展至“方法观”。
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 40
页数:22
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [61] How Do They Get In? Radical Parties and Government Participation in European Democracies.[J].Fagerholm Andreas.Government and Opposition.2019, 2
  • [62] Family business performance in a post-disaster scenario: The influence of socioemotional wealth importance and entrepreneurial orientation.[J].Manuel Alonso-Dos-Santos;Orlando Llanos-Contreras.Journal of Business Research.2019, C
  • [63] Do policy instruments matter? Governments’ choice of policy mix and higher education performance in Western Europe.[J].Capano Giliberto;Pritoni Andrea;Vicentini Giulia.Journal of Public Policy.2019, 3
  • [64] Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis: Best practices in strategy and organization research
    Greckhamer, Thomas
    Furnari, Santi
    Fiss, Peer C.
    Aguilera, Ruth V.
    [J]. STRATEGIC ORGANIZATION, 2018, 16 (04) : 482 - 495
  • [65] The Necessity of Discretion: A Behavioral Evaluation of Bottom-Up Implementation Theory
    Thomann, Eva
    van Engen, Nadine
    Tummers, Lars
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2018, 28 (04) : 583 - 601
  • [66] The role of motivations and involvement in wine tourists' intention to return: SEM and fsQCA findings.[J].Carolina Afonso;Graça Miranda Silva;Helena Martins Gonçalves;Margarida Duarte.Journal of Business Research.2018,
  • [67] GENDER-INCLUSIVE GATEKEEPING: HOW (MOSTLY MALE) PREDECESSORS INFLUENCE THE SUCCESS OF FEMALE CEOS
    Dwivedi, Priyanka
    Joshi, Aparna
    Misangyi, Vilmos F.
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2018, 61 (02): : 379 - 404
  • [68] Factors Driving the Promotion of Hydroelectricity: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis.[J].Lorenz Kammermann.Review of Policy Research.2018, 2
  • [69] Rethinking the effect of risk aversion on the benefits of service innovations in public administration agencies
    Torugsa, Nuttaneeya
    Arundel, Anthony
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2017, 46 (05) : 900 - 910
  • [70] Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA.[J].Patrick Mikalef;Adamantia Pateli.Journal of Business Research.2017,