Evaluation and Comparison of Automatic Brain Segmentation Methods Based On the Gold Standard Method

被引:0
|
作者
Zamanpour S.A. [1 ]
Ganji Z. [1 ]
Bigham B. [1 ]
Zemorshidi F. [2 ]
Zare H. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad
[2] Department of Neurology, Ghaem Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad
[3] Medical Physics Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad
关键词
Brain; Freesurfer; FSL; MRI; Segmentation; SPM;
D O I
10.22038/IJMP.2022.66025.2134
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Accurate segmentation of brain tissue in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important step in the analysis of brain images. There are automated methods used to segmentation the brain and minimize the disadvantages of manual segmentation, including time consuming and misinterpretations. These procedures usually involve a combination of skull removal, bias field correction, and segmentation. Therefore, segmented tissue quality assessment segmentation of gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is required for the analysis of neuroimages. Material and Methods: This paper presents the performance evaluation of three automatic methods brain segmentation, fluid and white matter suppression [FSL, Freesurfer (FreeSurfer is an open source package for the analysis and visualization of structural, functional, and diffusion neuroimaging data from cross-sectional and longitudinal studies) and SPM12 (Statistical Parametric Mapping)]. Segmentation with SPM12 was performed on three tissue probability maps: i) threshold 0.5, ii) threshold 0.7 and iii) threshold 0.9. In order to compare and evaluate the automatic methods, the reference standard method, i.e., manual segmentation, was performed by three radiologists. Results: Comparison of GM, WM and CSF segmentation in MR images was performed using similarities between manual and automatic segmentation. The similarity between the segmented tissues was calculated using diagnostic criteria. Conclusion: Several studies have examined the classification of GM, WM, and CSF using software packages. In these studies, different results have been obtained depending on the type of method and images used and the type of segmented tissues. In this study, the evaluation of the segmentation of these packages with reference standard method is performed. The results can help users in selecting an appropriate segmentation tool for neuroimages analysis. © (2023), (Mashhad University of Medical Sciences). All Rights Reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 245
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Automatic Brain Segmentation Method based on Supervoxels
    Tamajka, Martin
    Benesova, Wanda
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 23RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, SIGNALS AND IMAGE PROCESSING, (IWSSIP 2016), 2016, : 97 - 100
  • [2] Comparison of three unconjugated estriol methods to the gold standard method
    Scheibe, B. R.
    Bornhorst, J. A.
    Blacklaw, M. K.
    Wiley, C. L.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2008, 54 (06) : A230 - A230
  • [3] Comparing clinical evaluation of PET segmentation methods with reference-based metrics and no-gold-standard evaluation technique
    Zhu, Yansong
    Yousefirizi, Fereshteh
    Liu, Ziping
    Klyuzhin, Ivan
    Rahmim, Arman
    Jha, Abhinav
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 62
  • [4] Evaluation of three automatic brain vessel segmentation methods for stereotactical trajectory planning
    Neumann, Jan-Oliver
    Campos, Benito
    Younes, Bilal
    Jakobs, Martin
    Unterberg, Andreas
    Kiening, Karl
    Hubert, Alexander
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2019, 182
  • [5] Evaluation of an automatic brain segmentation method developed for neonates on adult MR brain images
    Moeskops, Pim
    Viergever, Max A.
    Benders, Manon J. N. L.
    Isgum, Ivana
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2015: IMAGE PROCESSING, 2015, 9413
  • [6] The Direct Oblique Method A New Gold Standard for Bronchoscopic Navigation That is Superior to Automatic Methods
    Miyake, Kotaro
    Morimura, Osamu
    Inoue, Takako
    Yoshida, Kenya
    Nagatomo, Izumi
    Kijima, Takashi
    Kumanogoh, Atsushi
    JOURNAL OF BRONCHOLOGY & INTERVENTIONAL PULMONOLOGY, 2018, 25 (04) : 305 - 314
  • [7] No-gold-standard evaluation of partial volume compensation methods for brain PET
    Zhu, Yansong
    Liu, Ziping
    Bilgel, Murat
    Rahmim, Arman
    Jha, Abhinav
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 62
  • [8] COMPARISON OF MANUAL AND AUTOMATIC METHODS OF HIPPOCAMPUS SEGMENTATION
    Bartecek, R.
    van Haren, N. E. M.
    Koolschijn, P. C. M. P.
    Pol, H. E. Hulshoff
    Kahn, R. S.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 26
  • [9] A comparison of accurate automatic hippocampal segmentation methods
    Zandifar, Azar
    Fonov, Vladimir
    Coupe, Pierrick
    Pruessner, Jens
    Collins, D. Louis
    NEUROIMAGE, 2017, 155 : 383 - 393
  • [10] Comparison of Two Bayesian Methods in Evaluation of the Absence of the Gold Standard Diagnostic Tests
    Li, Taishun
    Liu, Pei
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 2019