Evaluation and Comparison of Automatic Brain Segmentation Methods Based On the Gold Standard Method

被引:0
|
作者
Zamanpour S.A. [1 ]
Ganji Z. [1 ]
Bigham B. [1 ]
Zemorshidi F. [2 ]
Zare H. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad
[2] Department of Neurology, Ghaem Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad
[3] Medical Physics Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad
关键词
Brain; Freesurfer; FSL; MRI; Segmentation; SPM;
D O I
10.22038/IJMP.2022.66025.2134
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Accurate segmentation of brain tissue in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important step in the analysis of brain images. There are automated methods used to segmentation the brain and minimize the disadvantages of manual segmentation, including time consuming and misinterpretations. These procedures usually involve a combination of skull removal, bias field correction, and segmentation. Therefore, segmented tissue quality assessment segmentation of gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is required for the analysis of neuroimages. Material and Methods: This paper presents the performance evaluation of three automatic methods brain segmentation, fluid and white matter suppression [FSL, Freesurfer (FreeSurfer is an open source package for the analysis and visualization of structural, functional, and diffusion neuroimaging data from cross-sectional and longitudinal studies) and SPM12 (Statistical Parametric Mapping)]. Segmentation with SPM12 was performed on three tissue probability maps: i) threshold 0.5, ii) threshold 0.7 and iii) threshold 0.9. In order to compare and evaluate the automatic methods, the reference standard method, i.e., manual segmentation, was performed by three radiologists. Results: Comparison of GM, WM and CSF segmentation in MR images was performed using similarities between manual and automatic segmentation. The similarity between the segmented tissues was calculated using diagnostic criteria. Conclusion: Several studies have examined the classification of GM, WM, and CSF using software packages. In these studies, different results have been obtained depending on the type of method and images used and the type of segmented tissues. In this study, the evaluation of the segmentation of these packages with reference standard method is performed. The results can help users in selecting an appropriate segmentation tool for neuroimages analysis. © (2023), (Mashhad University of Medical Sciences). All Rights Reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 245
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] On brain atlas choice and automatic segmentation methods: a comparison of MAPER & FreeSurfer using three atlas databases
    Yaakub, Siti Nurbaya
    Heckemann, Rolf A.
    Keller, Simon S.
    McGinnity, Colm J.
    Weber, Bernd
    Hammers, Alexander
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [32] On brain atlas choice and automatic segmentation methods: a comparison of MAPER & FreeSurfer using three atlas databases
    Siti Nurbaya Yaakub
    Rolf A. Heckemann
    Simon S. Keller
    Colm J. McGinnity
    Bernd Weber
    Alexander Hammers
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [33] A comparison of segmentation methods with standard CFAR for point target detection
    McConnell, I
    Oliver, CJ
    SAR IMAGE ANALYSIS, MODELING, AND TECHNIQUES, 1998, 3497 : 76 - 87
  • [34] Comparison of Automatic Blood Vessel Segmentation Methods in Retinal Images
    Maruthusivarani, M.
    Ramakrishnan, T.
    Santhi, D.
    Muthukkutti, K.
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TRENDS IN VLSI, EMBEDDED SYSTEM, NANO ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEM (ICEVENT 2013), 2013,
  • [35] Performance evaluation of segmentation methods for brain CT images based hemorrhage detection
    Bhadauria, N. S.
    Bist, M. S.
    Patel, R. B.
    Bhadauria, H. S.
    2015 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING FOR SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT (INDIACOM), 2015, : 1955 - 1959
  • [36] Comparison of Two Methods for Automatic Segmentation of Brain MRI based on 2D Seed Growth and Two Stage FCM Algorithm
    Shanthi, K. J.
    Kumar, M. Sasi
    Keshavdas, C.
    2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE FOR MODELLING CONTROL & AUTOMATION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 1059 - +
  • [37] Performance Metric Evaluation of Segmentation Algorithms for Gold Standard Medical Images
    Kumar, S. N.
    Fred, A. Lenin
    Kumar, H. Ajay
    Varghese, P. Sebastin
    RECENT FINDINGS IN INTELLIGENT COMPUTING TECHNIQUES, VOL 3, 2018, 709 : 457 - 469
  • [38] An automatic performance evaluation method for document page segmentation
    Peng, LR
    Chen, M
    Liu, CS
    Ding, XQ
    Zheng, JR
    SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DOCUMENT ANALYSIS AND RECOGNITION, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 134 - 137
  • [39] A novel unsupervised segmentation method for MR brain images based on fuzzy methods
    Fan, M
    Yang, J
    Zheng, YJ
    Cheng, LS
    Zhu, Y
    COMPUTER VISION FOR BIOMEDICAL IMAGE APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3765 : 160 - 169
  • [40] Evaluating agreement with a gold standard in method comparison studies
    St Laurent, RT
    BIOMETRICS, 1998, 54 (02) : 537 - 545