One the use of expert judgement in the qualification of risk assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Rosqvist, Tony [1 ]
机构
[1] VTT Industrial Systems, Tekniikantie 12, P.O. Box 1301, FIN-02044 VTT, Finland
来源
VTT Publications | 2003年 / 507期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The increased use of risk assessment in governmental and corporate decision-making has increased the role of expert judgement in providing information for safety related decision-making. Expert judgements are required in most steps of risk assessment: hazard identification, risk estimation, risk evaluation and analysis of options. The use and elicitation of expert judgement is therefore subject to on-going research. Furthermore, expert judgement is also required in the quality assurance or quality verification of risk assessment. The research presented in the thesis addresses qualitative and probabilistic methods supporting the use of expert judgement in specific decision contexts; introduces a conceptual and procedural framework for quality verification of risk assessment; and presents techniques for the aggregation of probability distributions specified by experts' percentile information. The methodological view to risk assessment adopted in the thesis is requisite modelling, where a decision and risk model is developed for a certain decision context to support decision-making under uncertainty, and refined until the decision-maker has confidence in the results and prescriptions obtained from the model. The decision and risk modelling approaches presented in the thesis are related to specific decision contexts in maritime safety, maintenance management, and software reliability. The modelling approaches presented can, however, be utilised for risk-informed decision-making in other application areas as well.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 48
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Medical expert tasks in judgement of Imbeciller
    Dr Buchholz
    ALLGEMEINE ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHIATRIE UND PSYCHISCH-GERICHTLICHE MEDIZIN, 1900, 57 (2-3): : 340 - 396
  • [42] Involvement of expert judgement in dynamic model
    Krikstolaitis, R.
    Lutynska, A. E.
    Peciulyte, S.
    Zutautaite, I.
    SAFETY AND RELIABILITY: METHODOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS, 2015, : 393 - 397
  • [43] Improving judgement with prepaid expert advice
    Sniezek, JA
    Schrah, GE
    Dalal, RS
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2004, 17 (03) : 173 - 190
  • [44] Fifteen years of expert judgement at TUDelft
    Goossens, L. H. J.
    Cooke, R. M.
    Hale, A. R.
    Rodic-Wiersma, Lj.
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2008, 46 (02) : 234 - 244
  • [45] Assessment of professional judgement in the field of occupational hygiene: comparison of expert and observed data distributions
    Lowry, David
    Fritschi, Lin
    Mullins, Ben
    O'Leary, Rebecca
    SAFETY AND HEALTH AT WORK, 2022, 13 : S137 - S138
  • [46] The method of distilling expert information from expert judgement matrix
    Cen, Y.
    Liang, L.
    Xi Tong Gong Cheng Yu Dian Zi Ji Shu/Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2001, 23 (06): : 36 - 39
  • [47] Credibility of children's statements in abuse cases: The standards of assessment for expert judgement.
    Martinius, J
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KINDER-UND JUGENDPSYCHIATRIE UND PSYCHOTHERAPIE, 1999, 27 (02): : 121 - 124
  • [48] SEISMIC QUALIFICATION OF EQUIPMENT BY MEANS OF PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT
    AZARM, MA
    FARAHZAD, P
    BOCCIO, JL
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1982, 43 : 468 - 470
  • [49] Risk assessment - the needs of an expert panel
    Hartwig, Andrea
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2013, 221 : S41 - S41
  • [50] A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF HOW LEANING THE RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS INDUCES BIASED JUDGEMENT
    Al-Hajri, Jefain
    Kidd, Moray
    INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION - 2012, VOL 6, PTS A AND B, 2013, : 775 - 779