One the use of expert judgement in the qualification of risk assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Rosqvist, Tony [1 ]
机构
[1] VTT Industrial Systems, Tekniikantie 12, P.O. Box 1301, FIN-02044 VTT, Finland
来源
VTT Publications | 2003年 / 507期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The increased use of risk assessment in governmental and corporate decision-making has increased the role of expert judgement in providing information for safety related decision-making. Expert judgements are required in most steps of risk assessment: hazard identification, risk estimation, risk evaluation and analysis of options. The use and elicitation of expert judgement is therefore subject to on-going research. Furthermore, expert judgement is also required in the quality assurance or quality verification of risk assessment. The research presented in the thesis addresses qualitative and probabilistic methods supporting the use of expert judgement in specific decision contexts; introduces a conceptual and procedural framework for quality verification of risk assessment; and presents techniques for the aggregation of probability distributions specified by experts' percentile information. The methodological view to risk assessment adopted in the thesis is requisite modelling, where a decision and risk model is developed for a certain decision context to support decision-making under uncertainty, and refined until the decision-maker has confidence in the results and prescriptions obtained from the model. The decision and risk modelling approaches presented in the thesis are related to specific decision contexts in maritime safety, maintenance management, and software reliability. The modelling approaches presented can, however, be utilised for risk-informed decision-making in other application areas as well.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 48
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EXPERT JUDGEMENT OF AMOEBIASIS
    HOFLER, W
    ROLLINGHOFF, W
    MEDIZINISCHE KLINIK, 1974, 69 (30) : 1256 - 1261
  • [22] Aggregating expert judgement
    French, Simon
    REVISTA DE LA REAL ACADEMIA DE CIENCIAS EXACTAS FISICAS Y NATURALES SERIE A-MATEMATICAS, 2011, 105 (01) : 181 - 206
  • [23] Evaluation of Teacher Digital Competence Frameworks Through Expert Judgement: the Use of the Expert Competence Coefficient
    Cabero-Almenara, Julio
    Romero-Tena, Rosalia
    Palacios-Rodriguez, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF NEW APPROACHES IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (02) : 275 - 293
  • [24] One agency's use of risk assessment and risk communication
    Fisher, Ann
    Chitose, Atsushi
    Gipson, Philip S.
    Risk Analysis, 1994, 14 (02)
  • [25] CREDIT RISK ASSESSMENT AND META-JUDGEMENT
    PINSON, S
    THEORY AND DECISION, 1989, 27 (1-2) : 117 - 133
  • [26] Prioritization of hazards for risk and resilience management through elicitation of expert judgement
    Ioanna Ioannou
    Jaime E. Cadena
    Willy Aspinall
    David Lange
    Daniel Honfi
    Tiziana Rossetto
    Natural Hazards, 2022, 112 : 2773 - 2795
  • [27] Prioritization of hazards for risk and resilience management through elicitation of expert judgement
    Ioannou, Ioanna
    Cadena, Jaime E.
    Aspinall, Willy
    Lange, David
    Honfi, Daniel
    Rossetto, Tiziana
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2022, 112 (03) : 2773 - 2795
  • [28] The use of teacher judgement for summative assessment in the USA
    Brookhart, Susan
    ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2013, 20 (01) : 69 - 90
  • [29] InvestigateDiscussEstimateAggregate for structured expert judgement
    Hanea, A. M.
    McBride, M. F.
    Burgman, M. A.
    Wintle, B. C.
    Fidler, F.
    Flander, L.
    Twardy, C. R.
    Manning, B.
    Mascaro, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2017, 33 (01) : 267 - 279
  • [30] Expert judgement as an estimating method
    Hughes, RT
    INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 38 (02) : 67 - 75