One the use of expert judgement in the qualification of risk assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Rosqvist, Tony [1 ]
机构
[1] VTT Industrial Systems, Tekniikantie 12, P.O. Box 1301, FIN-02044 VTT, Finland
来源
VTT Publications | 2003年 / 507期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The increased use of risk assessment in governmental and corporate decision-making has increased the role of expert judgement in providing information for safety related decision-making. Expert judgements are required in most steps of risk assessment: hazard identification, risk estimation, risk evaluation and analysis of options. The use and elicitation of expert judgement is therefore subject to on-going research. Furthermore, expert judgement is also required in the quality assurance or quality verification of risk assessment. The research presented in the thesis addresses qualitative and probabilistic methods supporting the use of expert judgement in specific decision contexts; introduces a conceptual and procedural framework for quality verification of risk assessment; and presents techniques for the aggregation of probability distributions specified by experts' percentile information. The methodological view to risk assessment adopted in the thesis is requisite modelling, where a decision and risk model is developed for a certain decision context to support decision-making under uncertainty, and refined until the decision-maker has confidence in the results and prescriptions obtained from the model. The decision and risk modelling approaches presented in the thesis are related to specific decision contexts in maritime safety, maintenance management, and software reliability. The modelling approaches presented can, however, be utilised for risk-informed decision-making in other application areas as well.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 48
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A CRITIQUE OF CURRENT PRACTICE FOR THE USE OF EXPERT OPINIONS IN PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT
    MOSLEH, A
    BIER, VM
    APOSTOLAKIS, G
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1988, 20 (01) : 63 - 85
  • [32] Mitigating uncertainty using alternative information sources and expert judgement in aquatic non-indigenous species risk assessment
    Dahlstrom, Alisha
    Campbell, Marnie L.
    Hewitt, Chad L.
    AQUATIC INVASIONS, 2012, 7 (04) : 567 - 575
  • [33] An expert judgement assessment of future sea level rise from the ice sheets
    Bamber J.L.
    Aspinall W.P.
    Nature Climate Change, 2013, 3 (4) : 424 - 427
  • [34] An expert judgement assessment of future sea level rise from the ice sheets
    Bamber, J. L.
    Aspinall, W. P.
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2013, 3 (04) : 424 - 427
  • [35] Qualification for expert genetic Counseling
    Mondorf, Wolfgang
    HAMOSTASEOLOGIE, 2013, 33 (04): : 314 - 316
  • [36] Reporting Guidelines for the Use of Expert Judgement in Model-Based Economic Evaluations
    Iglesias, Cynthia P.
    Thompson, Alexander
    Rogowski, Wolf H.
    Payne, Katherine
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2016, 34 (11) : 1161 - 1172
  • [37] Reporting Guidelines for the Use of Expert Judgement in Model-Based Economic Evaluations
    Cynthia P. Iglesias
    Alexander Thompson
    Wolf H. Rogowski
    Katherine Payne
    PharmacoEconomics, 2016, 34 : 1161 - 1172
  • [38] Professional judgement in the assessment of risk: is there a role for systemic practice?
    Hurst, Mark
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY THERAPY, 2011, 33 (02) : 168 - 180
  • [39] Expert judgement and the Montserrat volcano eruption
    Aspinall, W
    Cooke, RM
    PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT (PSAM 4), VOLS 1-4, 1998, : 2113 - 2118
  • [40] CARMA: Food safety and expert judgement
    van der Fels-Klerx, HJ
    Havelaar, AH
    Nauta, MJ
    Goossens, LHJ
    Cooke, RM
    PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOL 1- 6, 2004, : 1541 - 1546