One the use of expert judgement in the qualification of risk assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Rosqvist, Tony [1 ]
机构
[1] VTT Industrial Systems, Tekniikantie 12, P.O. Box 1301, FIN-02044 VTT, Finland
来源
VTT Publications | 2003年 / 507期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The increased use of risk assessment in governmental and corporate decision-making has increased the role of expert judgement in providing information for safety related decision-making. Expert judgements are required in most steps of risk assessment: hazard identification, risk estimation, risk evaluation and analysis of options. The use and elicitation of expert judgement is therefore subject to on-going research. Furthermore, expert judgement is also required in the quality assurance or quality verification of risk assessment. The research presented in the thesis addresses qualitative and probabilistic methods supporting the use of expert judgement in specific decision contexts; introduces a conceptual and procedural framework for quality verification of risk assessment; and presents techniques for the aggregation of probability distributions specified by experts' percentile information. The methodological view to risk assessment adopted in the thesis is requisite modelling, where a decision and risk model is developed for a certain decision context to support decision-making under uncertainty, and refined until the decision-maker has confidence in the results and prescriptions obtained from the model. The decision and risk modelling approaches presented in the thesis are related to specific decision contexts in maritime safety, maintenance management, and software reliability. The modelling approaches presented can, however, be utilised for risk-informed decision-making in other application areas as well.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 48
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The role of expert judgement in risk assessment of complex plant
    Dumitrescu, M
    Carcadea, E
    Preda, IA
    Lazar, RE
    FORESIGHT AND PRECAUTION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2000, : 1083 - 1085
  • [2] Expert judgement for assessment of management influences on risk control
    Hale, AR
    Goossens, LHJ
    Costa, MF
    Matos, L
    Smit, K
    FORESIGHT AND PRECAUTION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2000, : 1077 - 1082
  • [3] Characterization of Precipitation through Copulas and Expert Judgement for Risk Assessment of Infrastructure
    Morales-Napoles, Oswaldo
    Paprotny, Dominik
    Worm, Daniel
    Abspoel-Bukman, Linda
    Courage, Wim
    ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART A-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2017, 3 (04):
  • [4] Expert Judgement in Pharmacoeconomic StudiesGuidance and Future Use
    Christopher Evans
    Bruce Crawford
    PharmacoEconomics, 2000, 17 : 545 - 553
  • [6] Applications of some risk assessment techniques: Formal expert judgement and accident sequence precursors
    Goossens, LHJ
    Cooke, RM
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 1997, 26 (1-2) : 35 - 47
  • [7] Expert judgement in the assessment of the contribution of safety management aspects to the control of major hazard risk
    Hale, A
    Goossens, L
    PSAM 5: PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2000, (34): : 1139 - 1144
  • [8] EXPERT JUDGEMENT ASSESSMENT Quantifying uncertainty on thin ice
    Cooke, R. M.
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2013, 3 (04) : 311 - 312
  • [9] Expert judgement
    Crispin, J. R.
    Ashcroft, M. R.
    Austin, R.
    Scolley, P.
    Makin, S. J.
    Heffernan, P. J.
    Clarkson, A. J.
    Martin, A. C.
    Telford, P. G.
    Potter, M. A.
    Ledlie, M. C.
    BRITISH ACTUARIAL JOURNAL, 2016, 21 (02) : 364 - 380
  • [10] Expert judgement-based risk factor identification and analysis for an effective nuclear decommissioning risk assessment modeling
    Awodi, Ngbede Junior
    Liu, Yong-Kuo
    Ayodeji, Abiodun
    Adibeli, Justina Onyinyechukwu
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2021, 136