A review of ice protection techniques for structures in the arctic and offshore harsh environments

被引:0
|
作者
Shi, Kewei [1 ]
Duan, Xili [1 ]
机构
[1] Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 240 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John's,NL,A1B 3X5, Canada
关键词
Offshore oil well production - Offshore structures - Snow and ice removal - Energy utilization;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Icing can jeopardize local infrastructure, hinder field operation, destroy vessel superstructures, and threaten life and property safety in the Arctic and other cold offshore and marine environments. Research on ice protection (both anti-icing and de-icing) technologies is critical to equipment, structures, and personnel in these environments. This review systematically evaluates a wide range of ice protection techniques divided into three main categories, i.e., active, passive, and hybrid ice protection techniques. Active anti-icing/de-icing technologies include mechanical, thermal, or chemical methods, requiring an additional energy source to prevent ice formation or remove accumulated ice from the target surfaces. Passive anti-icing/de-icing techniques can prevent ice accumulation or reduce ice adhesion without external energy sources; they create and maintain the icephobic properties of the target surfaces. Excessive energy consumption is a major technical limitation of active ice protection technologies. On the other hand, it is challenging for any passive technology to meet the long-term ice protection requirements in the Arctic or different cold offshore/marine environments. A combination of two or more active and passive ice protection methods, i.e., a hybrid approach, seems promising and can be applied in various situations according to the specific requirements of different vessels, offshore structures, and equipment. Copyright © 2021 by ASME.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ice induced vibrations of offshore structures
    Salganik, E. A.
    Shkhinek, K. N.
    MAGAZINE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2014, 48 (04): : 72 - 88
  • [42] ICE FORCES ON CONICAL OFFSHORE STRUCTURES
    KOLYMBAS, D
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 1987, 60 (02) : 217 - 231
  • [43] FLEXIBLE ENERGY HARVESTERS FOR HARSH ENVIRONMENTS: A REVIEW
    Haskell, Andrew
    Soltani, Seyed
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2022 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, IMECE2022, VOL 9, 2022,
  • [44] IMPROVING OFFSHORE STRUCTURES PROMOTE ARCTIC DEVELOPMENT
    BRUCE, JC
    PETROLEUM ENGINEER INTERNATIONAL, 1983, 55 (06): : 44 - &
  • [45] OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC FRONTIERS - STRUCTURES, OCEAN MINING
    CHUNG, JS
    MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 1985, 107 (05) : 54 - 63
  • [46] A novel hermetic encapsulation approach for the protection of electronics in harsh environments
    Spanier, Malte
    Pawlikowski, Jakub
    Ziesche, Steffen
    Kappert, Holger
    Ostmann, Andreas
    Jaegle, Martin
    Schneider-Ramelow, Martin
    2022 IEEE 9TH ELECTRONICS SYSTEM-INTEGRATION TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, ESTC, 2022, : 145 - 149
  • [47] Vibration protection of sensitive components of infrared equipment in harsh environments
    Veprik, AM
    Babitsky, VI
    Pundak, N
    Riabzev, SV
    SHOCK AND VIBRATION, 2001, 8 (01) : 55 - 69
  • [48] CATHODIC PROTECTION OF OFFSHORE STRUCTURES.
    Crundwell, Bob
    Petroleum Engineer International, 1980, 52 (12): : 76 - 84
  • [49] CORROSION PROTECTION OF OFFSHORE STRUCTURES.
    Shimizu, Yoshiaki
    Fujita, Sakae
    Kida, Akio
    Syoji, Norio
    Shima, Noboru
    Tamada, Akihiro
    Nippon Kokan technical report overseas, 1982, (35): : 72 - 82
  • [50] A Markovian reliability approach for offshore wind energy system analysis in harsh environments
    Adumene, Sidum
    Okoro, Aghatise
    ENGINEERING REPORTS, 2020, 2 (03)