A review of ice protection techniques for structures in the arctic and offshore harsh environments

被引:0
|
作者
Shi, Kewei [1 ]
Duan, Xili [1 ]
机构
[1] Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 240 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John's,NL,A1B 3X5, Canada
关键词
Offshore oil well production - Offshore structures - Snow and ice removal - Energy utilization;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Icing can jeopardize local infrastructure, hinder field operation, destroy vessel superstructures, and threaten life and property safety in the Arctic and other cold offshore and marine environments. Research on ice protection (both anti-icing and de-icing) technologies is critical to equipment, structures, and personnel in these environments. This review systematically evaluates a wide range of ice protection techniques divided into three main categories, i.e., active, passive, and hybrid ice protection techniques. Active anti-icing/de-icing technologies include mechanical, thermal, or chemical methods, requiring an additional energy source to prevent ice formation or remove accumulated ice from the target surfaces. Passive anti-icing/de-icing techniques can prevent ice accumulation or reduce ice adhesion without external energy sources; they create and maintain the icephobic properties of the target surfaces. Excessive energy consumption is a major technical limitation of active ice protection technologies. On the other hand, it is challenging for any passive technology to meet the long-term ice protection requirements in the Arctic or different cold offshore/marine environments. A combination of two or more active and passive ice protection methods, i.e., a hybrid approach, seems promising and can be applied in various situations according to the specific requirements of different vessels, offshore structures, and equipment. Copyright © 2021 by ASME.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ICE ACTION ON FIXED OFFSHORE STRUCTURES - A STATE-OF-THE-ART REVIEW
    NESSIM, MA
    CHEUNG, MS
    JORDAAN, IJ
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1987, 14 (03) : 381 - 407
  • [32] Arctic slope protection: Considerations for ice
    Croasdale, K.R.
    Allyn, N.
    Roggensack, W.
    Technical Council on Cold Regions Engineering Monograph, 1988, : 216 - 243
  • [33] A review on defects in steel offshore structures and developed strengthening techniques
    Dehghani, Ayoub
    Aslani, Farhad
    STRUCTURES, 2019, 20 : 635 - 657
  • [34] Laser clad corrosion protection for mild and harsh environments
    Mahmood, K.
    Stevens, N.
    Pinkerton, A. J.
    SURFACE ENGINEERING, 2012, 28 (08) : 576 - 584
  • [35] Surface coatings offer opportunities for protection in harsh environments
    Graham, T.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF METAL FINISHING, 2011, 89 (02): : 70 - 71
  • [36] CATHODIC PROTECTION OF OFFSHORE STRUCTURES
    BURGBACHER, JA
    MATERIALS PROTECTION, 1968, 7 (04): : 26 - +
  • [37] CATHODIC PROTECTION OF OFFSHORE STRUCTURES
    LEHMANN, JA
    JOURNAL OF METALS, 1970, 22 (03): : 56 - &
  • [38] THE FRACTURE RESISTANCE APPROACH IN ORDER TO PREVENT BRITTLE FAILURE OF OFFSHORE STRUCTURES UNDER ARCTIC ENVIRONMENTS
    Horn, Agnes Marie
    Ostby, Erling
    Moslet, Per Olav
    Hauge, Mons
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 35TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING , 2016, VOL 4, 2016,
  • [39] CATHODIC PROTECTION OF OFFSHORE STRUCTURES
    WYATT, BS
    ANTI-CORROSION METHODS AND MATERIALS, 1977, 24 (04) : 5 - 10
  • [40] A dynamic human reliability model for marine and offshore operations in harsh environments
    Abaei, Mohammad Mandi
    Abbassi, Rouzbeh
    Garaniya, Vikram
    Arzaghi, Ehsan
    Toroody, Ahmad Bahoo
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2019, 173 : 90 - 97