A review of ice protection techniques for structures in the arctic and offshore harsh environments

被引:0
|
作者
Shi, Kewei [1 ]
Duan, Xili [1 ]
机构
[1] Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 240 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John's,NL,A1B 3X5, Canada
关键词
Offshore oil well production - Offshore structures - Snow and ice removal - Energy utilization;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Icing can jeopardize local infrastructure, hinder field operation, destroy vessel superstructures, and threaten life and property safety in the Arctic and other cold offshore and marine environments. Research on ice protection (both anti-icing and de-icing) technologies is critical to equipment, structures, and personnel in these environments. This review systematically evaluates a wide range of ice protection techniques divided into three main categories, i.e., active, passive, and hybrid ice protection techniques. Active anti-icing/de-icing technologies include mechanical, thermal, or chemical methods, requiring an additional energy source to prevent ice formation or remove accumulated ice from the target surfaces. Passive anti-icing/de-icing techniques can prevent ice accumulation or reduce ice adhesion without external energy sources; they create and maintain the icephobic properties of the target surfaces. Excessive energy consumption is a major technical limitation of active ice protection technologies. On the other hand, it is challenging for any passive technology to meet the long-term ice protection requirements in the Arctic or different cold offshore/marine environments. A combination of two or more active and passive ice protection methods, i.e., a hybrid approach, seems promising and can be applied in various situations according to the specific requirements of different vessels, offshore structures, and equipment. Copyright © 2021 by ASME.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PREDICTED ICE ACCRETION ON HORIZONTAL SURFACES OF MARINE VESSELS AND OFFSHORE STRUCTURES IN ARCTIC REGIONS
    Dehghani-Sanij, Alireza
    Muzychka, Yuri S.
    Naterer, Greg F.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 35TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING , 2016, VOL 8, 2016,
  • [22] Issues in structural health monitoring for fixed-type offshore structures under harsh tidal environments
    Jung, Byung-Jin
    Park, Jong-Woong
    Sim, Sung-Han
    Yi, Jin-Hak
    SMART STRUCTURES AND SYSTEMS, 2015, 15 (02) : 335 - 353
  • [23] EFFICIENCY OF ICE MANAGEMENT FOR ARCTIC OFFSHORE OPERATIONS
    El Bakkay, Badr
    Coche, Edmond
    Riska, Kaj
    33RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, 2014, VOL 10: POLAR AND ARCTIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014,
  • [24] Ice gouge reliability of offshore arctic pipelines
    Younan, A. H.
    Hamilton, J. M.
    Weaver, J.
    Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Vol 5, 2007, : 141 - 147
  • [25] Dynamic occupational risk model for offshore operations in harsh environments
    Song, Guozheng
    Khan, Faisal
    Wang, Hangzhou
    Leighton, Shelly
    Yuan, Zhi
    Liu, Hanwen
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2016, 150 : 58 - 64
  • [26] Deepwater floating production systems in harsh environments offshore Norway
    Carpenter, Chris
    Meling, T.S.
    1600, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) (66): : 95 - 96
  • [27] ARCTIC ICE AND DRILLING STRUCTURES
    SODHI, DS
    MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 1985, 107 (04) : 63 - 69
  • [28] CONCRETE CONCEPTS FOR ARCTIC OFFSHORE STRUCTURES
    GERWICK, B
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1971, 23 (FEB): : 211 - &
  • [29] A numerical technique in calculation of dynamic interaction forces between ice floe and Arctic offshore structures
    Choi, K
    Rim, CW
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH (1996) INTERNATIONAL OFFSHORE AND POLAR ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL II, 1996, 1996, : 304 - 310
  • [30] Limit state design and methodologies in ice class rules for ships and standards for Arctic offshore structures
    Riska, Kaj
    Bridges, Robert
    MARINE STRUCTURES, 2019, 63 : 462 - 479