Optimization of huff-n-puff gas injection in shale oil reservoirs

被引:0
|
作者
James JSheng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech University
[2] Southwest Petroleum University
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Earlier studies show that huff-n-puff injection is preferred to continuous gas flooding to improve liquid oil production in shale oil reservoirs. Compared to gas flooding, huff-n-puff has more operational parameters to optimize so that liquid oil production can be maximized. This paper is to discuss the optimum huff-n-puff times, number of cycles and soaking time under practical operational and reservoir conditions. The operational and reservoir conditions dictate the maximum injection and production rates, and the maximum injection pressure and minimum production pressure.The numerical simulation results and discussions show that the optimum huff time is so long that the pressure near the wellbore reaches the set maximum injection pressure during the huff period; and the optimum puff time is the time required for the pressure near the wellbore to reach the set minimum production pressure during the puff period. The benefits of soaking may not compensate the loss in injection and production due to the time lost in the soaking period.Therefore, soaking may not be necessary during the huff-n-puff gas injection in shale oil reservoirs.The number of huff-n-puff cycles is determined when an economic rate cut-off is reached.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Laboratory Evaluation of the Natural Gas Huff-n-puff Method for Heavy Oil Reservoirs in the Orinoco Belt, Venezuela
    Sun, X.
    Zhang, Y.
    [J]. PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 32 (18) : 2168 - 2174
  • [32] Optimization of Recovery by Huff 'n' Puff Gas Injection in Shale-Oil Reservoirs Using the Climbing-Swarm Derivative-Free Algorithm
    Olusola, Bukola Korede
    Orozco, Daniel
    Aguilera, Roberto
    [J]. SPE RESERVOIR EVALUATION & ENGINEERING, 2021, 24 (01) : 205 - 218
  • [33] CO2-EOR mechanisms in huff-n-puff operations in shale oil reservoirs based on history matching results
    Alfarge, Dheiaa
    Wei, Mingzhen
    Bai, Baojun
    [J]. FUEL, 2018, 226 : 112 - 120
  • [34] Recovery Mechanisms for Cyclic (Huff-n-Puff) Gas Injection in Unconventional Reservoirs: A Quantitative Evaluation Using Numerical Simulation
    Hoffman, B. Todd
    Reichhardt, David
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (18)
  • [35] The Supercritical CO2 Huff-n-puff Experiment of Shale Oil Utilizing Isopropanol
    Shang, Shengxiang
    Dong, Mingzhe
    Gong, Houjian
    [J]. 2017 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MATERIAL APPLICATION (ESMA2017), VOLS 1-4, 2018, 108
  • [36] Mechanisms and Influencing Factors of High-Temperature and Pressure Huff-n-Puff Imbibition Process in Continental Shale Oil Reservoirs
    Dong, Dapeng
    Wei, Jianguang
    Zhao, Guozhong
    Yang, Ying
    Song, Ge
    Zhou, Xiaofeng
    Li, Fuquan
    Yu, Shaojun
    Cui, Huanqi
    Wang, Qingzhen
    Fu, Lanqing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY ENGINEERING, 2023, 149 (06)
  • [37] Experimental and numerical studies of rich gas Huff-n-Puff injection in tight formation
    Shilov, Evgeny
    Dorhjie, Desmond Batsa
    Mukhina, Elena
    Zvada, Maya
    Kasyanenko, Anton
    Cheremisin, Alexey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 208
  • [38] An efficient hybrid methodology for optimization of CO2 Huff-n-Puff EOR and sequestration in tight oil reservoirs
    Ding, Shuaiwei
    Liu, Qian
    Li, Peng
    Wang, Lei
    Li, Yuanduo
    Zhang, Meng
    Xu, Chuan
    Ma, Jinfeng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2024, 132
  • [39] Performance evaluation of CO2 Huff-n-Puff and continuous CO2 injection in tight oil reservoirs
    Zuloaga, Pavel
    Yu, Wei
    Miao, Jijun
    Sepehrnoori, Kamy
    [J]. ENERGY, 2017, 134 : 181 - 192
  • [40] LABORATORY EVALUATION OF THE CO2 HUFF-N-PUFF PROCESS FOR HEAVY OIL-RESERVOIRS
    SAYEGH, SG
    MAINI, BB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANADIAN PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1983, 22 (02): : 32 - 32