Optimization of huff-n-puff gas injection in shale oil reservoirs

被引:0
|
作者
James JSheng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech University
[2] Southwest Petroleum
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Earlier studies show that huff-n-puff injection is preferred to continuous gas flooding to improve liquid oil production in shale oil reservoirs. Compared to gas flooding, huff-n-puff has more operational parameters to optimize so that liquid oil production can be maximized. This paper is to discuss the optimum huff-n-puff times, number of cycles and soaking time under practical operational and reservoir conditions. The operational and reservoir conditions dictate the maximum injection and production rates, and the maximum injection pressure and minimum production pressure.The numerical simulation results and discussions show that the optimum huff time is so long that the pressure near the wellbore reaches the set maximum injection pressure during the huff period; and the optimum puff time is the time required for the pressure near the wellbore to reach the set minimum production pressure during the puff period. The benefits of soaking may not compensate the loss in injection and production due to the time lost in the soaking period.Therefore, soaking may not be necessary during the huff-n-puff gas injection in shale oil reservoirs.The number of huff-n-puff cycles is determined when an economic rate cut-off is reached.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Optimization and Analysis of CO2 Huff-n-Puff Process in Shale Oil Reservoirs Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM)
    Wang, Yinqing
    Hu, Jinghong
    Xie, Weiwei
    Zhang, Yuan
    [J]. GEOFLUIDS, 2022, 2022
  • [22] Optimizing the Huff 'n' Puff Gas Injection Performance in Shale Reservoirs Considering the Uncertainty: A Duvernay Shale Example
    Hamdi, Hamidreza
    Clarkson, Christopher R.
    Esmail, Ali
    Sousa, Mario Costa
    [J]. SPE RESERVOIR EVALUATION & ENGINEERING, 2021, 24 (01) : 219 - 237
  • [23] Gas injection assisted steam huff-n-puff process for oil recovery from deep heavy oil reservoirs with low-permeability
    Wan, Tao
    Wang, XiaoJun
    Jing, Ziyan
    Gao, Yang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 185
  • [24] A Comparative Experimental Study of Huff-n-Puff Gas Injection and Surfactant Treatment in Shale Gas-Condensate Cores
    Sharma, Sharanya
    Sheng, James J.
    Shen, Ziqi
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2018, 32 (09) : 9121 - 9131
  • [25] Novel laboratory investigation of huff-n-puff gas injection for shale oils under realistic reservoir conditions
    Mahzari, Pedram
    Mitchell, Thomas M.
    Jones, Adrian P.
    Oelkers, Eric H.
    Striolo, Alberto
    Iacoviello, Francesco
    Shearing, Paul R.
    Juri, Juan Ernesto
    [J]. FUEL, 2021, 284
  • [26] LOWER LIMITS OF COUPLING PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SHALE OIL RESERVOIRS FOR THE APPLICATION OF CO2 HUFF-N-PUFF
    Wang, Peng
    Huang, Shijun
    Zhao, Fenglan
    [J]. ENERGY PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT IN THE 21ST CENTURY V: The Quest for Sustainable Energy, 2022, 255 : 3 - 13
  • [27] Cyclic gas injection huff-n-puff in multi-stage fracturing horizontal wells to improve recovery of shale oil and gas reservoirs: Taking Eagle Ford Shale in North America as an example
    Wang, Yong
    Tang, Yong
    Li, Shilun
    Liu, Xin
    [J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2023, 43 (01) : 153 - 161
  • [28] Effect of hydraulic fracture deformation hysteresis on CO2 huff-n-puff performance in shale gas reservoirs
    Yan, Xia
    Liu, Pi-yang
    Huang, Zhao-qin
    Sun, Hai
    Zhang, Kai
    Wang, Jun-feng
    Yao, Jun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE A, 2023, 24 (01): : 37 - 55
  • [29] Optimization of water huff-n-puff injection in Chang 8 tight oil reservoir by Taguchi method
    Ma, Xianlin
    Wang, Yanan
    Zhan, Jie
    Wang, Dan
    Liu, Zhenzhi
    [J]. PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 42 (20) : 2914 - 2931
  • [30] Diffusion Effect on Shale Oil Recovery by CO2 Huff-n-Puff
    Peng, Zesen
    Sheng, J.
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2023, : 2774 - 2790