CO2-EOR mechanisms in huff-n-puff operations in shale oil reservoirs based on history matching results

被引:67
|
作者
Alfarge, Dheiaa [1 ,2 ]
Wei, Mingzhen [2 ]
Bai, Baojun [2 ]
机构
[1] Iraqi Minist Oil, Baghdad, Iraq
[2] Missouri Univ Sci & Technol, Rolla, MO USA
关键词
CO2-EOR in shale oil reservoirs; CO2-EOR huff-n-puff operations; Unconventional EOR methods; Improved oil recovery; DIFFUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2018.04.012
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Improved Oil Recovery (IOR) techniques in Unconventional Liquids Rich Reservoirs (ULR) are still a new concept because there is no commercial project for any IOR technique so far. Carbon dioxide (CO2) based EOR technique has been effectively applied to improve oil recovery in the tight formations of conventional reservoirs. Extending this approach to unconventional formations has been extensively investigated over the last decade because CO2 has unique properties which make it the first option of EOR methods to be tried. However, the applications and mechanisms for CO2-EOR in unconventional reservoirs would not necessarily be the same as in conventional reservoirs due to the complex and poor-quality properties of these plays. Since the first CO2-EOR huff-n-puff project was conducted in conventional reservoirs in Trinidad and Tobago in 1984, more than 130 additional projects have been put in operation around the world, mainly located in USA, Turkey, and Trinidad and Tobago. In this study, we combined Production Data Analysis (PDA) for the production data of these projects with numerical simulation methods to produce one typical graph accounts for the main mechanisms controlling CO2-EOR performance in conventional reservoirs. On the other hand, we have couple of CO2-EOR huff-n-puff pilot tests conducted in Bakken formation between 2008 and 2016. Two engineering-reversed approaches have been integrated to produce a unique type curve for the performance of CO2-EOR huff-n-puff process in shale oil reservoirs. Firstly, a numerical simulation study was conducted to upscale the reported experimental-studies outcomes to the field conditions. As a result, different forward diagnostic plots have been generated from different combinations for CO2 physical mechanisms with different shale-reservoirs conditions. Secondly, different backward diagnostic plots have been produced from the history match with CO2 performances in fields' pilots performed in some portions of Bakken formation located in North Dakota and Montana. Finally, fitting the backward with the forward diagnostic plots was used to produce another unique type curve to represent CO2-EOR performance in shale oil reservoirs. This study found that the delayed response in the incremental oil production resulted from CO2 injection in shale reservoirs is mainly function of CO2 molecular diffusion mechanism. On the other hand, the CO2 diffusion mechanism has approximately no effect on CO2-EOR performance in conventional reservoirs which have a quick response to CO2 injection. This finding is very well consistent with the experimental reports regarding the role of diffusion in conventional cores versus shale cores. In addition, this study found that kinetics of oil recovery process in productive areas and CO2-diffusivity level are the keys to perform a successful CO2-EOR project in shale formations. This paper provides a thorough idea about how CO2-EOR performance is different in the field scale of conventional reservoirs versus shale formations.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 120
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Geochemical insights for CO2 huff-n-puff process in shale oil reservoirs
    Chen, Yongqiang
    Sari, Ahmad
    Zeng, Lingping
    Saeedi, Ali
    Xie, Quan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS, 2020, 307
  • [2] Optimization of huff-n-puff gas injection in shale oil reservoirs
    James JSheng
    [J]. Petroleum, 2017, 3 (04) - 437
  • [3] Asphaltene deposition and permeability impairment in shale reservoirs during CO2 huff-n-puff EOR process
    Li, Lei
    Su, Yuliang
    Lv, Yuting
    Tu, Jiawei
    [J]. PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 38 (04) : 384 - 390
  • [4] A comparative study of CO2 and N2 huff-n-puff EOR performance in shale oil production
    Li, Lei
    Su, Yuliang
    Hao, Yongmao
    Zhan, Shiyuan
    Lv, Yuting
    Zhao, Qingmin
    Wang, Haitao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 181
  • [5] Upscale methodology for gas huff-n-puff process in shale oil reservoirs
    Li, Lei
    Sheng, James J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2017, 153 (153) : 36 - 46
  • [6] Selection of hydrocarbon gas for huff-n-puff IOR in shale oil reservoirs
    Ozowe, Williams
    Zheng, Shuang
    Sharma, Mukul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 195
  • [7] An efficient hybrid methodology for optimization of CO2 Huff-n-Puff EOR and sequestration in tight oil reservoirs
    Ding, Shuaiwei
    Liu, Qian
    Li, Peng
    Wang, Lei
    Li, Yuanduo
    Zhang, Meng
    Xu, Chuan
    Ma, Jinfeng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2024, 132
  • [8] Diffusion Effect on Shale Oil Recovery by CO2 Huff-n-Puff
    Peng, Zesen
    Sheng, J.
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2023, 37 (04) : 2774 - 2790
  • [9] LOWER LIMITS OF COUPLING PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SHALE OIL RESERVOIRS FOR THE APPLICATION OF CO2 HUFF-N-PUFF
    Wang, Peng
    Huang, Shijun
    Zhao, Fenglan
    [J]. ENERGY PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT IN THE 21ST CENTURY V: The Quest for Sustainable Energy, 2022, 255 : 3 - 13
  • [10] Recovery mechanisms and formation influencing factors of miscible CO2 huff-n-puff processes in shale oil reservoirs: A systematic review
    Wan, Yidi
    Jia, Chengzao
    Lv, Weifeng
    Jia, Ninghong
    Jiang, Lin
    Wang, Yanqi
    [J]. ADVANCES IN GEO-ENERGY RESEARCH, 2024, 11 (02): : 88 - 102