Comparison of the Energy Contributions of Different Types of Ground Heat Exchangers Related to Cost in a Working Ground Source Heat Pump System

被引:2
|
作者
Christou, Christakis [1 ]
Stylianou, Iosifina I. [1 ]
Aresti, Lazaros [2 ]
Florides, Georgios A. [2 ]
Christodoulides, Paul [2 ]
机构
[1] Cyprus Univ Technol, Dept Elect Engn Comp Engn & Informat, CY-3036 Limassol, Cyprus
[2] Cyprus Univ Technol, Fac Engn & Technol, CY-3036 Limassol, Cyprus
关键词
ground source heat pump; ground heat exchanger; open well; helicoidal coil; GEOTHERMAL-ENERGY; PERFORMANCE; MAPS;
D O I
10.3390/en17184621
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Geothermal systems face adoption challenges due to their high initial investment cost. Accurate cost analyses and a more precise understanding of updated prices could assist geothermal industry projects in obtaining investment financing and better money management with the right equipment. As the cost of geothermal installations can vary widely depending on case and location, it seems essential to clarify the factors and parameters that determine the cost of the system. These include the type of loop system, the ground conditions, the type of heat pump, the system size, and the geographical location. The scope of this study is to compare the operation of various types of ground heat exchangers (GHEs) present in a Ground Source Heat Pump (GSHP) system installed in the coastal area of the Mediterranean climate zone of Cyprus. The highlight of this work is that it presents real installation cost data as well as recorded total energy contributed by the GHEs to the GSHP system of a HP cooling and heating capacities of 101 kW and 117 kW, respectively. The input contribution from the GHEs to the HP is 85,650 kWh (308,340 MJ) in summer and 25,880 kWh (93,168 MJ) in winter. It is shown that, among the three groups of GHEs investigated, the open-well GHE complex has the lowest cost per kWh ratio (0.32 EUR/kWh), followed by the vertical GHE complex (1.05 EUR/kWh), and lastly by the helical coil GHE (2.77 EUR/kWh). This clearly suggests that when underground water is available, the open-well GHE is much more favorable than other GHE types.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Unified heat transfer model of vertical U-tube heat exchangers for ground source heat pump system
    Zhang, Z.-W. (zwzhang10@126.com), 1600, Tsinghua University (31):
  • [32] Numerical investigation on thermal performance of ground heat exchangers using phase change materials as grout for ground source heat pump system
    Qi, Di
    Pu, Liang
    Sun, Futao
    Li, Yanzhong
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 106 : 1023 - 1032
  • [33] Energy and exergy analysis of a combined ground source heat pump system
    Ozturk, Murat
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 73 (01) : 362 - 370
  • [35] Energy and exergy analysis of a combined ground source heat pump system
    Ozturk, M. (muratozturk@sdu.edu.tr), 1600, Elsevier Ltd (73):
  • [36] Energy and exergy analysis of a ground source (geothermal) heat pump system
    Hepbasli, A
    Akdemir, O
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 45 (05) : 737 - 753
  • [37] Investigation of a ground source heat pump system using different ground couplings and secondary refrigerants
    Riffat, S
    Abodahab, N
    Doherty, P
    Al-Huthaili, S
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND APPLICATION, VOL I AND II, 2001, : 1037 - 1042
  • [38] GROUND MASSIF AS A HEAT SOURCE FOR HEAT PUMP
    Sed'ova, M.
    PROCEEDING OF 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRENDS IN AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING 2016, 2016, : 633 - 637
  • [39] Energy piles for ground source heat pump applications: Comparison of heat transfer performance for different design and operating parameters
    Carotenuto, Alberto
    Marotta, Pasquale
    Massarotti, Nicola
    Mauro, Alessandro
    Normino, Gennaro
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 124 : 1492 - 1504
  • [40] Heat simulation analysis of heat exchangers with inclined boreholes in ground-source heat pump systems
    Zhao, Songying
    Chen, Chen
    CONSTRUCTION AND URBAN PLANNING, PTS 1-4, 2013, 671-674 : 2551 - 2554