Significance and feasibility of air kerma length product and air kerma area product comparisons

被引:0
|
作者
Zivanovic, Milos [1 ]
Kortmis, Maja Vojnic [2 ]
Krzanovic, Nikola [1 ]
Daletic, Milos [1 ]
Komatina, Ivana [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Vinca Inst Nucl Sci, Natl Inst Republ Serbia, Dept Radiat & Environm Protect, Mike Petrovica Alasa 12-14, Belgrade 11351, Serbia
[2] IBA Dosimetry GmbH, Secondary Stand Dosimetry Lab, Banhofstr 5, Schwarzenbruck, Germany
[3] Univ Belgrade, Fac Phys Chem, Studentski Trg 12-16, Belgrade 11158, Serbia
关键词
Diagnostic radiology; Intercomparison; Air kerma area product; Air kerma length product; KAP-meter; CT-chamber; CALIBRATION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.radmeas.2024.107291
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
Air kerma length product and air kerma area product are special quantities used in diagnostic radiology. They are measured using special measurement devices - CT-chambers and KAP-meters, in order to calculate quantities related to patient exposure. Appropriate calibration of all measurement devices is of vital importance, and comparisons between calibration laboratories are necessary to prove competence. It is usually considered adequate to participate in air kerma comparisons to prove capabilities for special quantities, but the literature shows that some problems in calibration procedure can remain unknown. The comparisons directly in terms of special quantities provide additional burden to laboratories, and require special transfer instruments, but they allow checking the whole calibration procedures. This paper describes a comparison between two calibration laboratories in terms of both air kerma length product and air kerma area product. Both laboratories achieved good results for all radiation qualities, considering the measurement uncertainty. Transfer instruments' linearity, field size dependence and energy dependence were investigated. Even though the metrological properties of the transfer instruments are worse than the ionization chambers, they can be taken into account by introducing additional measurement uncertainty, performing appropriate corrections or choosing calibration points for the comparison for the values of influence quantities where the transfer instrument response is relatively flat. These comparisons provide additional value to calibration laboratories, but there are still several challenges related to their organization and execution.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Re-evaluation of the product of (W/e)air and the graphite to air stopping-power ratio for 60Co air kerma standards
    Thomson, R. M.
    Rogers, D. W. O.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (13): : 3577 - 3595
  • [32] Kerma Area Product and Energy Incident on Patients in X-Ray Imaging
    Tipnis, S.
    Marzolf, S.
    Frey, G.
    Huda, W.
    He, W.
    Mah, E.
    Yao, H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [33] Conversion factors of effective and equivalent organ doses with the air kerma area product in patients undergoing coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions
    Brambilla, M.
    Cannillo, B.
    Matheoud, R.
    Compagnone, G.
    Rognoni, A.
    Bongo, A. S.
    Carriero, A.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 42 : 189 - 196
  • [34] Re-Evaluation of the Product of W/e and the Graphite to Air Stopping Power Ratio for Co-60 Air Kerma Standards
    Thomson, R. M.
    Rogers, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06) : 2782 - +
  • [35] Calibration methodology application of kerma area product meters in situ: Preliminary results
    Costa, N. A.
    Potiens, M. P. A.
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2014, 104 : 201 - 203
  • [36] IAEA-SSDL bilateral comparisons for diagnostic level air kerma measurement standards
    Csete, Istvan
    Toroi, Paula
    Steuer, Andreas
    Hourdakis, Costas
    Gabris, Frantisek
    Jozela, Sibusiso
    Kosunen, Antti
    Cardoso, Joao
    Sochor, Vladimir
    Persson, Linda
    Cindro, Denis Glavic
    Arib, Mehenna
    Smekhov, Mark
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 47 : 9 - 15
  • [37] Development and characterization of air kerma cavity standard
    Szymko, M. M.
    Michalik, L.
    Knyziak, A. B.
    Wojtowicz, A. W.
    MEASUREMENT, 2019, 136 : 647 - 657
  • [38] Comparison of the NIST and ENEA air kerma standards
    Laitano, RF
    Lamperti, PJ
    Toni, MP
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 103 (04) : 365 - 378
  • [39] Use of secondary air kerma from dose area product and fluoroscopy time for preventive effective dose estimation in interventional radiology procedures for staff
    Indovina, Luca
    Moretti, Roberto
    Breschi, Laura
    Cusumano, Davide
    Meffe, Guenda
    Placidi, Lorenzo
    Nardini, Matteo
    Reale, Roberta
    Quici, Arturo
    Placidi, Elisa
    Stimato, Gerardina
    Capotosti, Amedeo
    JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2023, 43 (02)
  • [40] Seasonal variation of air kerma rate in Sicily
    Basile, S.
    Brai, M.
    Marrale, M.
    Rizzo, S.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY, 2008, 99 (07) : 1149 - 1153