Significance and feasibility of air kerma length product and air kerma area product comparisons

被引:0
|
作者
Zivanovic, Milos [1 ]
Kortmis, Maja Vojnic [2 ]
Krzanovic, Nikola [1 ]
Daletic, Milos [1 ]
Komatina, Ivana [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Vinca Inst Nucl Sci, Natl Inst Republ Serbia, Dept Radiat & Environm Protect, Mike Petrovica Alasa 12-14, Belgrade 11351, Serbia
[2] IBA Dosimetry GmbH, Secondary Stand Dosimetry Lab, Banhofstr 5, Schwarzenbruck, Germany
[3] Univ Belgrade, Fac Phys Chem, Studentski Trg 12-16, Belgrade 11158, Serbia
关键词
Diagnostic radiology; Intercomparison; Air kerma area product; Air kerma length product; KAP-meter; CT-chamber; CALIBRATION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.radmeas.2024.107291
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
Air kerma length product and air kerma area product are special quantities used in diagnostic radiology. They are measured using special measurement devices - CT-chambers and KAP-meters, in order to calculate quantities related to patient exposure. Appropriate calibration of all measurement devices is of vital importance, and comparisons between calibration laboratories are necessary to prove competence. It is usually considered adequate to participate in air kerma comparisons to prove capabilities for special quantities, but the literature shows that some problems in calibration procedure can remain unknown. The comparisons directly in terms of special quantities provide additional burden to laboratories, and require special transfer instruments, but they allow checking the whole calibration procedures. This paper describes a comparison between two calibration laboratories in terms of both air kerma length product and air kerma area product. Both laboratories achieved good results for all radiation qualities, considering the measurement uncertainty. Transfer instruments' linearity, field size dependence and energy dependence were investigated. Even though the metrological properties of the transfer instruments are worse than the ionization chambers, they can be taken into account by introducing additional measurement uncertainty, performing appropriate corrections or choosing calibration points for the comparison for the values of influence quantities where the transfer instrument response is relatively flat. These comparisons provide additional value to calibration laboratories, but there are still several challenges related to their organization and execution.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Air-kerma length calibration of CT ionization chambers
    Jensen, A.
    DeWerd, L.
    Micka, J.
    Davis, S.
    Culberson, W.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2006 - 2006
  • [22] The air-kerma rate constant: Application to air-kerma measurements for homeland security
    Pibida, L.
    Minniti, R.
    Lucas, L.
    Seltzer, S. M.
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 2008, 94 (02): : 126 - 133
  • [23] Assessment of protocols in cone-beam CT with symmetric and asymmetric beams usingeffective dose and air kerma-area product
    Batista, Wilson Otto
    Soares, Maria Rosangela
    de Oliveira, Marcus V. L.
    Maia, Ana F.
    Caldas, Linda V. E.
    APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2015, 100 : 16 - 20
  • [24] Analysis of Factors Affecting Air Kerma Area Product Obtained during Uterine Artery Embolization Procedures Using Logistic Regression
    Soliman, Khaled
    Almutairi, Ahmed
    AlHarbi, Murdhi
    Almutairi, Khaleel
    Almutairi, Turky
    Bakkari, Mousa
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING, 2021, 31 (02): : 265 - 269
  • [25] Air-kerma cavity standards
    Bueermann, L.
    Burns, D. T.
    METROLOGIA, 2009, 46 (02) : S24 - S38
  • [26] Conservation of integrated reference air kerma
    Song, H.
    Wu, Q.
    Steffey, B.
    Yin, F.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2083 - 2083
  • [27] AIR KERMA RATE CONSTANTS FOR RADIONUCLIDES
    WASSERMAN, H
    GROENEWALD, W
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1988, 14 (11): : 569 - 571
  • [28] International comparisons of air kerma standards in Cs-137 gamma radiation
    Leitner, A
    Witzani, J
    Boutillon, M
    AllisyRoberts, P
    Delaunay, F
    Leroy, E
    Lamperti, P
    Strachotinsky, C
    Csete, I
    METROLOGIA, 1997, 34 (02) : 169 - 175
  • [29] Review of air kerma-area product, effective dose and dose conversion coefficients for non-cardiac interventional fluoroscopy procedures
    Miller, Donald L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (03) : 975 - 982
  • [30] ESTIMATES OF PATIENT DOSES AND KERMA-AREA PRODUCT MONITORING IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY
    Kaushik, Chanchal
    Sandhu, Inderjeet Singh
    Srivastava, A. K.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2020, 190 (01) : 22 - 30