How to define the threshold of takeover response ability of different drivers in conditional automated driving

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Haolin [1 ]
Zhao, Xiaohua [1 ]
Chen, Chen [1 ]
Li, Zhenlong [1 ]
Li, Haijian [1 ]
Gong, Jianguo [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Beijing Key Lab Traff Engn, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
[2] Res Inst Rd Safety MPS, Beijing 100062, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Automated vehicle; Takeover time; Threshold calculation; Driver attributes; generalized Pareto distribution; Driving simulator; EXTREME-VALUE THEORY; GENERALIZED PARETO DISTRIBUTION; INFERENCE; BEHAVIOR; MODEL; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.013
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In conditional automated driving, the takeover response ability threshold is necessary for driver qualification assessment and liability division of automated vehicle accidents. The primary objective of this study is to establish a clear and quantifiable threshold for drivers' takeover response ability in conditional automated driving scenarios. This threshold aims to serve as a benchmark for evaluating drivers' readiness and developing safety regulations in automated driving. We designed 18 takeover events and invited 42 drivers to participate in the driving simulation experiment, and obtained their takeover time data. First, we analyze the differences of takeover time among drivers with different attributes (gender, age, driving year). Second, based on the Peaks Over Threshold and the generalized Pareto distribution model, we use the graphic method to calculate the range of takeover time threshold for drivers with different attributes. The result shows that the difference in the threshold range of takeover time between male and female drivers is relatively tiny. There are differences in the threshold range of takeover time for different age drivers, and the threshold is negatively correlated with age. Drivers with high driving experience within a safe range are allowed to have longer takeover times. Finally, the rationality of the takeover time threshold for drivers with different attributes has been verified. The return level curves are approximately linear (R-2 > 0.77), indicating that the GPD model can capture the overall trend of the return level, which is changing with the probability level. This proves that the takeover time threshold is reasonable. This study uses TTCmin to calibrate takeover safety, and the takeover time threshold has a good classification performance for takeover safety (accuracy > 85 %). The above content proves the rationality of the takeover time threshold. The contribution of this study is to calculate the takeover time threshold of drivers with different attributes, which can help regulatory authorities assess the driver's takeover response ability and support the liability division of automated vehicle accidents.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 198
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multitasking While Driving: How Drivers Self-Regulate Their Interaction with In-Vehicle Touchscreens in Automated Driving
    Ebel, Patrick
    Lingenfelder, Christoph
    Vogelsang, Andreas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2023, 39 (16) : 3162 - 3179
  • [42] Are Drivers Allowed to Sleep? Sleep Inertia Effects Drivers' Performance after Different Sleep Durations in Automated Driving
    Schwarze, Doreen
    Diederichs, Frederik
    Weiser, Lukas
    Widlroither, Harald
    Verhoeven, Rolf
    Roetting, Matthias
    MULTIMODAL TECHNOLOGIES AND INTERACTION, 2023, 7 (06)
  • [43] A human factors perspective on how to keep SAE Level 3 conditional automated driving safe
    Gerber, Michael A.
    Schroeter, Ronald
    Ho, Bonnie
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH INTERDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVES, 2023, 22
  • [44] Repeated conditionally automated driving on the road: How do drivers leave the loop over time?
    Dillmann, J.
    Den Hartigh, R. J. R.
    Kurpiers, C. M.
    Raisch, F. K.
    Kadrileev, N.
    Cox, R. F. A.
    De Waard, D.
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2023, 181
  • [45] How the initial level of trust in automated driving impacts drivers' behaviour and early trust construction
    Manchon, J-B
    Bueno, Mercedes
    Navarro, Jordan
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2022, 86 : 281 - 295
  • [46] How Will Drivers Take Back Control in Automated Vehicles? A Driving Simulator Test of an Interleaving Framework
    Nagaraju, Divyabharathi
    Ansah, Alberta
    Ch, Nabil Al Nahin
    Mills, Caitlin
    Janssen, Christian P.
    Shaer, Orit
    Kun, Andrew L.
    AUTOMOTIVEUI '21: 13TH INTERNATIONAL ACM CONFERENCE ON AUTOMOTIVE USER INTERFACES AND INTERACTIVE VEHICULAR APPLICATIONS, 2021, : 20 - 27
  • [47] Highly Automated Truck Driving - How Can Drivers Safely Perform Sport Exercises on the Go?
    Richardson, Natalie Tara
    Sinning, Michael
    Fries, Michael
    Stockert, Sonja
    Lienkamp, Markus
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMOTIVE USER INTERFACES AND INTERACTIVE VEHICULAR APPLICATIONS (AUTOMOTIVE UI '15), 2015, : 84 - 87
  • [48] How Do Drivers Perceive Risks During Automated Driving Scenarios? An fNIRS Neuroimaging Study
    Perello-March, Jaume
    Burns, Christopher G.
    Woodman, Roger
    Birrell, Stewart
    Elliott, Mark T.
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2024, 66 (09) : 2244 - 2263
  • [49] How various urgencies and visibilities influence drivers' takeover performance in critical car-following conditions? A driving simulation study
    Lin, Zijian
    Chen, Feng
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2024, 104 : 303 - 317
  • [50] How Does Approaching a Lead Vehicle and Monitoring Request Affect Drivers' Takeover Performance? A Simulated Driving Study with Functional MRI
    Li, Chimou
    Li, Xiaonan
    Lv, Ming
    Chen, Feng
    Ma, Xiaoxiang
    Zhang, Lin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (01)